Skip to main content
Log in

On Witness-Discernibility of Elementary Particles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of discussions about the nature of ‘identical particles’ and the status of Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles in Quantum Mechanics, a novel kind of physical discernibility has recently been proposed, which we call witness-discernibility. We inquire into how witness-discernibility relates to known kinds of discernibility. Our conclusion will be that for a wide variety of cases, including the intended quantum-mechanical ones, witness-discernibility collapses extensionally to absolute discernibility, that is, to discernibility by properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arenhart, J.R.B. (2012). Many entities, no identity. Synthese (to appear).

  • Caulton, A., Butterfield, J. (2012). On kinds of indiscernibility in logic and metaphysics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63, 27–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieks, D., Versteegh, M.A.M. (2008). Identical quantum particles and weak discernibility. Foundations of Physics 38, 923–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S., Krause, D. (2006). Identity in physics: A historical, philosophical and formal analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jantzen, B.C. (2011). No two entities without identity. Synthese 181, 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J., Bigaj, T. (2010). The principle of the identity of indiscernibles and quantum mechanics. Philosophy of Science 77, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J., Bigaj, T. (2011). Private communication by e-mail, 2011.

  • Ladyman, J., Linnebo, Ø., Pettigrew, R. (2012). Identity and discernibility in philosophy and logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 5.1, 162-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, F.A. (2011). How to defeat Wüthrich’s Abysmal embarrassment argument against space-time structuralism. Philosophy of Science 78, 1046-1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, F.A., Saunders, S.W. (2008). Discerning fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59, 499–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, F.A., Seevinck, M.P. (2009). Discerning elementary particles. Philosophy of Science 76, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.v.O. (1976). Grades of discriminability. Journal of Philosophy 73, 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S. (2003). Physics and Leibniz’s principles. In: K. Brading, E. Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in physics: Philosophical reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 289–307.

  • Saunders, S. (2006). Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 66.1, 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank two anonymous referees for some helpful remarks, and J. Ladyman, T. Bigaj and the members of the Bristol Structuralism Seminar for conversations on the subject-matter. Øystein Linnebo was supported by an ERC Starting Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. A. Muller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linnebo, Ø., Muller, F.A. On Witness-Discernibility of Elementary Particles. Erkenn 78, 1133–1142 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-012-9385-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-012-9385-4

Keywords

Navigation