Abstract
The soy expansion model in Argentina generates structural changes in traditional lifestyles, which can be associated with different biophysical and socioeconomic impacts. To explore this issue, we apply an innovative method for integrated assessment—the multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism framework—to characterize two communities in the Chaco Region, Province of Formosa, North of Argentina. These communities have recently experienced the expansion of soy production, altering their economic activity, energy consumption patterns, land use and human time allocation. The integrated characterization presented in the paper illustrates the differences (biophysical, socioeconomic and historical) between the two communities that can be associated with different responses. The analysis of the factors behind these differences has important policy implications for the sustainable development of local communities in the area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The questionnaire applied can be found in supplementary documents.
Argentina does not officially use the term ‘indigenous’, but rather ‘aboriginal’ population. We use the term indigenous, which is more frequent in Latin America.
The indigenous called criollos to the inhabitants that colonized their land.
The small producers have less than 10 hectares.
Every defined area has in general one property that could be one extended family (meaning two or more households).
A traditional drink.
The distribution considers an urban area in the center and the chacras around this area.
Activities mainly related to women’s roles such as caring of children, preparing food, cleaning the house.
Roundup Ready Soybeans. The Roundup Ready® seeds contain in-plant tolerance to Roundup® agricultural herbicides, allowing growers to spray Roundup agricultural herbicides to kill the weeds without harming the crop.
References
Altieri, M. (2009). The ecological impacts of large-scale agrofuel monoculture production systems in the Americas. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 236–244.
Arizpe, N., Giampietro, M., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2011). Food security and fossil energy dependence: An international comparison of the use of fossil energy in agriculture (1991–2003). Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1–2), 45–63. doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.554352.
Arizpe N., Ramos-Martin J., & Giampietro M., (2012). Scaling-up the analysis of societal metabolism: From household to community metabolism. Draft Paper.
Azcuy, A. E., & León, C. (2005). La sojización: Contradicciones, intereses y debates. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Agrarios, 23, 133–158.
Boletta, P. E., Ravelo, A. C., Planchuelo, A. M., & Grilli, M. (2006). Assessing deforestation in the Argentine Chaco. Forest Ecology and Management, 228, 108–114.
Bryman, A. (1989). Research methods and organization studies. ROUTLEDGE United Kingdom. ISBN:9780415084048.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (748 p.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CIA. (2009). The World. Argentina: Central Inteligence Agency Fact book. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/print/ar.html.
EPRASOL. (2008). Territorio Indigena: Situación, usos, problemas y propuestas (p. 24). Las Lomitas, Formosa: EPRASOL.
FAO. (2010). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food Price Indices. http://coin.fao.org/cms/world/argentina/es/InformaccionSobreElPais.html?
FIDA. (2009). Cartographie participative et bonnes pratiques. Rome Italie: Étude préparée pour le Fonds international de développement agricole. 55.
García-López, G. A., & Arizpe, N. (2010). Participatory processes in the soy conflicts in Paraguay and Argentina. Ecological Economics, 70, 196–206.
Gasparri, N. I., & Grau, H. R. (2009). Deforestation and fragmentation of Chaco dry forest in NW Argentina (1972–2007). Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 913–921.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41, 347–381.
Giampietro, M. (2003). Multi-scale integrated analysis of agro-ecosystems. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 472 pp.
Giampietro, M., Allen, T. F. H., & Mayumi, K. (2006a). Science for governance: The implications of the complexity revolution. In A. Guimaraes-Pereira, S. Guedes-Vaz, & S. Tognetti (Eds.), Interfaces between science and society (pp. 82–99). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Giampietro, M., Allen, T. F. H., & Mayumi, K. (2006b). The epistemological predicament associated with purposive quantitative analysis. Ecological Complexity, 3, 307–327.
Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2000). Multiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: Integrating biophysical and economic representations across scales. Population Environment, 22(2), 155–210.
Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Munda, G. (2006c). Integrated assessment and energy analysis: Quality assurance in multi-criteria analysis of sustainability. Energy, 31, 59–86.
Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Sorman, A. H. (2011). The metabolic pattern of societies: Where economists fall short. Routledge.
Goldsmith, P., Bing, Li., Fruin, J., & Hirsch, R. (2004). Global shifts in agro-industrial capital and the case of soybean crushing: Implications for managers and policy makers. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 7(2), 87–115.
Gomiero, T., & Giampietro, M. (2001). Multiple-scale integrated analysis of farming systems. The Thuong Lo commune (Vietnamese uplands) case study. Population and Environment, 22(3), 315–352.
Grau, H. R., Gasparri, N. I., & Aide, T. M. (2005). Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of northwest Argentina. Environmental Conservation, 32, 140–148.
Grünbühel, C. M., Haberl, H., Schandl, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2003). Socio-economic metabolism and colonisation of natural processes in Sang Saeng village: Material and energy flows, land use and cultural change in Northeast Thailand. Human Ecology, 31(1), 53–85.
Grünbühel, C., & Schandl, H. (2005). Using land-time-budgets to analyse farming systems and poverty alleviation policies in the LAO PDR. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 5(3/4), 142–180.
IADB Garten Rothkopf. (2007). A Blueprint for Green Energy in the Americas. Strategic analysis of opportunities for Brazil and the Hemisphere. Featuring: The global biofuels outlook. Prepared for the Inter-American Development Bank by Garten. Inter American Development Bank, Washington, DC, P. 53.
INDEC. (2001). Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 1991 y 2001.
Iñigo, V. (2008). Sujetos productivos, sujetos políticos, sujeto indígena: Las formas de su objetivación mercantil entre los tobas del Este de Formosa. Tesis doctoral Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Mathews, J. A., & Goldsztein, H. (2009). Capturing latecomer advantages in the adoption of biofuels: The case of Argentina. Energy Policy, 37, 326–337.
MSyA, & UNEP. (2004). GEO Argentina: Perspectivas del medio ambiente. Ministerio de Salud y Ambiente de la Nacio′n (MSyA) Argentina and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). www.ambiente.gov.ar/archivos/ web/GEO/File/Geo_Argentina_2004.pdfS.
Ministerio del Interior. (2011). Portal Oficial del Gobierno de la Provincia de Formosa.
Monti, M., (2008a). Impacto en el sector productivo por el aumento en los Derechos de Exportación en Soja. Dirección de Extensión e Investigación Agropecuaria, Ministerio de la Producción, Provincia de Santa Fé, Argentina.
Monti, M. (2008b). Retenciones móviles en los granos: Impactos económicos en el Distrito de Rufino. Dirección de Extensión e Investigación Agropecuaria, Ministerio de la Producción, Provincia de Santa Fé, Argentina.
Morello, J. H., & Rodriguez, A. F. (2009). El Chaco sin bosques/edición literaria a cargo de Jorge H. Morello y Andrea F. Rodríguez. 1a ed.—Buenos Aires: Orientación Gráfica Editora, 432 p. ISBN 978-987-9260-73-9.
Morello, J., Rodriguez, A., & Pengue, W. (2006). Mirando al revés: la ciudad desde el campo. El caso de la llanura chaco-pampeana argentina. In: A. Brown, U. Ortiz, M. Acerbi, & J. Corcuera (Eds.), La situación ambiental argentina 2005 (pp. 447–455). Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina.
Naumann, M., & Madariaga, M. (2003). Atlas Argentino. Programa de Acción Nacional de Lucha contra la Desertificación, Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Buenos Aires. 94 p.
Negri, R., (2008). Argentine Management and the ‘Pampas Revolution’. Consorcios Regionales de Experimentación Agrícola (CREA), BuenosAires.
NOAA. (2009). Stakeholder engagement strategies for participatory mapping. USA: Coastal Services Center.
Pastore, G., Giampietro, M., & Ji, L. (1999). Conventional and land-time budget analysis of rural villages in Hubei province, China. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18(3), 331–358.
Pengue, W. (2005). Transgenic crops in Argentina: The ecological and social debt. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25, 314–322.
Pengue, W. (2009a). El Desarrollo Rural Sostenible y los procesos de agriculturización, ganaderización y pampenización en la llanura Chaco-Pampeana. In: W. Pengue (Eds.), Fundamentos de Economía Ecológica. Bases teóricas e instrumentos para la resolución de los conflictos sociedad naturaleza. Editorial Kaicron. Buenos Aires.
Pengue, W. A. (2009b). Se está perdiendo la Soberanía Alimentaria de los Pueblos. Entrevista. Diario Página 12. Buenos Aires. Febrero 2.
Qaim, M., & Traxler, G. (2005). Roundup ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agricultural Economics, 31(1), 73–86.
Rusell, B. (2009). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN 9780761914037.
Tomei, J., & Upham, P. (2009). Argentinean soy-based biodiesel: An introduction to production and impacts. Energy Policy, 37, 3890–3898.
Zak, M., Cabido, D. Caceres., & Diaz, S. (2008). What drives accelerated land cover change in central Argentina? Synergistic consequences of climatic, socioeconomic and technological factors. Environmental Management, 42(2008), 181–189.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to the following institutions for their help with this research: GEPAMA (University of Buenos Aires), the Qom community “La Primavera” and Tacaaglé’s community, MOCAFOR. We also acknowledge support from (i) the Catalan Government for a FI Scholarship, the Emergent Research Group on “Integrated Assessment: sociology, technology and the environment” SGR2009-042496 and the Consolidated Research Group on “Economic Institutions, Quality of Life and the Environment,” SGR2009-00962; (ii) the European Commission, EuropeAid Cooperation Office funded Alfa project Sustainable Use of Photosynthesis Products&Optimum Resource Transformation (SUPPORT); (iii) the EU funded project Synergies in Multi-Scale Interlinkages of Eco-Social Systems (SMILE, Contract 217213-FP7-2007-SSH-1); and (iv) the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation Project HAR–2010–20684–C02–01 and MSOCA-CSO2010-21979. Finally, we thank Liana Williams for proofreading and for very helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arizpe, N., Ramos-Martín, J. & Giampietro, M. An assessment of the metabolic profile implied by agricultural change in two rural communities in the North of Argentina. Environ Dev Sustain 16, 903–924 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9532-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9532-y