Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental externalities in relation to agricultural sector in Thailand with trade-linked analysis

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thailand plays an important role in the international trade of food and agricultural products, which is in alignment with its national strategy of serving as the “kitchen of the world.” When looking at its agricultural promotion and export policies, the country only counts the value gains from exports while neglecting environmental externalities related to plantation practices. The purpose of this study was to perform a trade-off analysis between consumptive water, land, and fertilizer use together with the economic values of major crops for export and consumption in the country. The results show that to gain income from agricultural exports, the country has exploited various natural resources. The area used to harvest rice, sugarcane, cassava, and rubber adds up to approximately 15.3 million ha: 7.2 million ha of which is for domestic consumption and 8.1 ha for export. To produce Thailand’s agricultural exports, total water use is estimated to be 49.8–67.5 billion m3 per year (61–65 %), while the amount used to produce crops for domestic consumption is 26.5–43.7 billion m3 per year (35–39 %). Meanwhile, 1,056–1,826 thousand tons (54 %) of fertilizer was used on crops for domestic consumption, and 1,222–1,370 thousand tons (46 %) of fertilizer was used on export crops. The best crop choice for export in terms of its export value, land use, fertilizer use, and water consumption is rubber. The worst crop choices for export are rice and cassava. More sustainable agricultural practices are needed to effect improvements such as increased yields and reduced fertilizer and water use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agricultural Information Center. (2008). Agricultural economics. Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricultural Information Center. (2010). Agricultural economics. Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindraban, P. S., & Rabbinge, R. (2011). European food and agricultural strategy for 21st century. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 9(1/2), 80–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsari, B. (2011). Agroecology to the rescue of food security and germplasm conservation in a global market economy. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 9(1/2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Agricultural Information. (2011). Thailand foreign agricultural trade statistics. Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheun-im, N., Ingkapradit, W., Keethapirom, S., & Sinbuathong, N. (2010). The application of chemical fertilizers on paddy field according to the soil analysis data. In 48th Kasetsart University annual conference. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Department of Agriculture. Cassava Plantation Manual. Retrieved September, 2012, from http://it.doa.go.th/pibai/pibai/n11/v_11-mar/jakfam2.html.

  • FAO. (2004). Impact of climate change on agriculture in Asia and the Pacific. In Twenty-seventh FAO Regional conference for Asia and the Pacific. Beijing, China.

  • FAO. (2011). Thailand and FAO achievements and success stories. Italy: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, J. P. (2003). Assigning priority to environmental policy interventions in a heterogeneous world. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. H. (2003). Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science, 302, 1524–1528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdy, A., Ragab, R., & Scarascia-Mugnozza, E. (2003). Coping with water scarcity: Water saving and increasing water productivity. Irrigation and Drainage, 52, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Y. A., Chapagain, K. A., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2009). Water footprint manual: State of the Art 2009. Enschede, The Netherlands: Water Footprint Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Index Mundi. (2013). Thailand economy profile 2013. Retrieved November, 2013, from http://www.indexmundi.com/thailand/economy_profile.html.

  • Irrigation Water Management Research Group. (2011). Crop coefficient (Kc) 40 crop types. Bangkok: Office of Hydrology and Water Management Royal Irrigation Department.

  • Kaneko, S., Tanaka, K., & Toyota, T. (2004). Water efficiency of agricultural production in China: Regional comparison from 1999 to 2002. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 3(3/4), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornrawee, S. (2007). The Northeast monsoon (winter season) in Thailand. In Joint meeting for the seasonal prediction of the East Asian winter monsoon. Korean.

  • Liu, J., et al. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226.

  • Liu, J., & Yang, W. (2012). Water sustainability for China and beyond. Science, 337, 649–650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Yang, W. (2013). Integrated assessments of payments for ecosystem services programs. PNAS, 110(41), 16297–16298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macauley, M. K., & Chen, D. (2004). Space resources and the challenge of energy and the environment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magsig, B. O. (2012). Rising to the challenge of water security: International (water) law in need of refinement. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 4, 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massarutto, A. (2003). Water pricing and irrigation water demand: Economic efficiency versus environmental sustainability. European Environment, 13, 100–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OAE. (2011). Agricultural situation and trend 2011. Bureau of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

  • Office of Agricultural Economics. (2010). Agricultural economics database. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Agricultural Economics. (2011a). Agricultural statistics of Thailand. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Agricultural Economics. (2011b). Total import amount of chemical fertilizer imports 2005–2011. Bangkok: Ministry for Agricultural and Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Rubber Replanting Aid Fund. Fertilizer used in rubber plantation. Retrieved March, 2013, from http://www.rubber.co.th/web/home.php.

  • Palaniappan, M., & Gleick, H. P. (2009). The world’s water 2008–2009. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard, K., & Johnson, T. (2010). Medelling policies for multifunctional agriculture and rural development—A Norwegian case study. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Irrigation Department. (2010). Crop water requirement. Bangkok: Ministry for Agricultural and Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Irrigation Department. (2011). Reference evapotranspiration by Penman—Monteith from 1981–2011. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Thai Government. (2012). The Government’s rice pledging policy. Retrieved June, 2013, from http://www.thaigov.go.th/en/news-room/item/72404-the-governments-rice-pledging-policy.html.

  • Schou, S. J. (1996). Indirect regulation of externalities: The case of Danish agriculture. European Environment, 6, 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS. (2009). Water science glossary of terms. Reston, VA: USGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A., Krogh, E., Gundersen, E., & Vedeld, P. (2002). Environmental taxes and politics—The dispute over nitrogen taxes in agriculture. European Environment, 12, 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlahos, G., & Beopoulos, N. (2003). Environmentally friendly policy schemes as models for the introduction and use of agri-environmental indicators in Greece. European Environment, 13, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by International College of the National Institute of Development Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of this organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aweewan Mangmeechai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangmeechai, A. Environmental externalities in relation to agricultural sector in Thailand with trade-linked analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 16, 1031–1040 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9509-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9509-2

Keywords

Navigation