Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental justice of nuclear waste policy in Taiwan: Taipower, government, and local community

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an investigation into Taiwan’s policy on nuclear waste disposal, concentrating on the ways in which dumping sites have been chosen, and on the wider implications of those choices. The central aim was to examine whether this policy breached the distributive and procedural principles of environmental justice by discriminating against disadvantaged areas and minority ethnic groups. The paper first clarifies the meaning of environmental justice and then applies it to the case study of Taiwan’s decision announced in 2009 that Da-Ren (達仁鄉) in Taitung County (台東縣) and Wang-An (望安鄉) in Penghu County (澎湖縣) were its two favoured potential sites for the final disposal repository of radioactive waste. The findings of the research suggest that the Taiwan government and the nuclear power provider, Taipower, failed to fulfil the requirements of environmental justice in reaching this decision. The contribution of this case study to the literature on the environmental injustice of nuclear waste siting policies is fourfold. First, it adds to the growing number of studies that show how siting decisions systematically and deliberately disadvantage vulnerable communities. Second, it finds the basis of this discriminatory policy to lie in the wider pattern of inequality that exists in Taiwanese society—a pattern that is rooted in historical traditions of racial and tribal prejudice, reinforced by contemporary forms of corruption. Third, it suggests that a solution to the problem of environmental injustice in nuclear waste siting policy may have to wait until these broader practices of unequal treatment in Taiwan are addressed. Fourth, it speculates that the need for a solution to the nuclear waste problem may be a catalyst for dealing with these broader patterns of unequal treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The case study is exclusively concerned with the siting of low level-nuclear waste in Taiwan, though local people were worried that other types of waste might also be stored in such sites.

  2. An interesting implication of demands for local control over decision-making is that communities could choose to accept nuclear waste siting, which happened in 1996 when the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians decided to host a high-level radioactive waste facility on their reservation in Tooele County, Utah (Ishiyama 2003). Of course, as Ishiyama (2003) points out, even that decision could be interpreted as a consequence of environmental injustice, since the historic discrimination against the Goshute Indians left them with no other economic options.

References

  • Act on Sites for Establishment of Low Level Radioactive Waste Final Disposal Facility. (2006). Taipei: Atomic Energy Council, Executive Yuan (in Mandarin). http://erss.aec.gov.tw/law/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL039264&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1. Accessed 8 Oct 2008.

  • Atomic Energy Council (AEC). (2006). Radioactive waste management in Taiwan: Low level radioactive waste final disposal. http://www.aec.gov.tw/english. Accessed 22 Jan 2007.

  • Bell, D. (2004). Environmental justice and Rawls’ difference principle. Environmental Ethics, 26(3), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2013). Coming of age? Environmental politics at 21. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerner, C., & Lambert, T. (1995). Environmental injustice. Public Interest, Winter, Issue, 118, 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1992). Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(3), 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B. (1995). Issues and potential policies and solutions for environmental justice: an overview. In B. Bryant (Ed.), Environmental justice: issues, policies, and solutions (pp. 8–34). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, D., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). The dilemma of siting a high-level nuclear waste Repository. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Bureau. (2010). Report on prediction of total electricity capacity from 20102019. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Executive Yuan (in Mandarin).

  • European Commission. (2002). Eurobarometer 56.2: Europeans and radioactive waste. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Fan, M.-F. (2006). Nuclear waste facilities on tribal land: The Yami’s struggles for environmental justice. Local Environment, 11(4), 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1988). Equality as a moral ideal. In H. Frankfurt (Ed.), The importance of what we care about (pp. 134–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, N., & Steinsapir, C. (1992). Not in our back yard: the grassroots environmental movements. In: R. Dunlap & A. Mertig (Eds.), American environmentalism: the U.S. environmental movements 19701990 (pp. 27–38). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

  • Fuel Circle and Material Administration. (2010). Index of environmental sustainability. Taipei: Atomic Energy Council (in Mandarin). http://gamma1.aec.gov.tw/fcma/environment_lasting_number.asp. Accessed 20 July 2011.

  • Gaventa, J. (1991). Power and powerless: quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofrichter, R. (1993). Environmental justice for all. In R. Hofrichter (Ed.), Toxic struggles: the theory and practice of environmental justice (pp. 3–22). Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and disrespect: principles of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. (2001). Framing the problem of radioactive waste: public and institutional perspectives. In K. Anderson (Ed.), Proceedings VALDOR 2001—The 2nd VALDOR symposium addressing transparency in risk assessment and decision-making (pp. 222–229). Sweden: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • IET [Institution of Engineers and Technology]. (2005). Nuclear waste disposal and transportation of spent fuel. London: Institution of Engineers and Technology. http://www.iee.org/Policy/Areas/EnvEnergy/nucwaste.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2009.

  • Ishiyama, N. (2003). Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: Case study of a land-use conflict in skull valley, Utah. Antipode, 35(1), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuletz, V. (1998). The tainted desert. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (2005). The social and ethical aspect of nuclear waste. Electronical Green Journal, 21, 1–22. http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj21/marshall1.html. Accessed 17 May 2008.

  • Openshaw, S., Carver, S., & Fernie, J. (1989). Britain’s nuclear waste: Safety and siting. London: Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1998). Equality and priority. In A. Mason (Ed.), Ideals of equality (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1995). Equality, sufficiency, and opportunity in the just society. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(2), 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental justice and the new pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. (2003). The justice of environmental justice: reconciling, equality, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In A. Light & A. De-Shalit (Eds.), Moral and political reasoning in environmental practice (pp. 77–106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (2002). Environmental justice: Creating equality and reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, A. (1994). Ecopopulism: toxic waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiwan Power Company, Taipower. (2009). Nuclear backend fund. (in Mandarin). http://nplbudget.ly.gov.tw/budget_ly_97/txt/document/97pnb4_2_10.doc. Accessed 30 Jan 2009.

  • Temkin, L. (2003). Equality, priority or what? Economic and Philosophy, 19(1), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA [US Environmental Protection Agency]. (2000). Office of environmental justice F.A.Q. What is environmental justice? http://www.es.epa.gov/oeca/main/ej/faq.html. Accessed: 9 March 2009.

  • Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, P. S. (2001). Taiwan’s nuclear history. Taipei: Atomic Energy Council (in Mandarin).

  • Wilson, L. (2000). Nuclear waste: Exploring the ethical dilemmas. Toronto, ON: United Church Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillan Chi-Lun Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, G.CL., Gray, T. & Bell, D. Environmental justice of nuclear waste policy in Taiwan: Taipower, government, and local community. Environ Dev Sustain 15, 1555–1571 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9461-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9461-1

Keywords

Navigation