Abstract
The common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) are being propagated as the policy response to circumvent the pollution problem from the small-scale industries (SSIs), which abound in developing countries. The formation of the CETPs has been hailed as a collective action or co-operative solution to a common problem involving all the agents responsible for pollution. This paper investigated the desired criteria for designing an institution aimed at solving a common resource problem and factors ensuring the smooth functioning or sustainability of the institution. The design criteria and factors are then tested on a CETP set up in the Indian state of Haryana. The CETP, which was commissioned in 1997 had to be converted to a sewage treatment plant (STP) as the collective arrangement collapsed. The criteria used in the present analysis are that of Ostrom’s [Governing the Commons. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1990] design principles, whereas the factors considered for sustainability are the one suggested by Rawls [A Theory of Justice. USA, Harvard University Press, 1971]. The analysis indicates that the Kundli CETP failed in both counts as neither all the design principles were met nor did the institution fulfil different sustainability criteria. The paper concludes with the lessons that can be learnt from Kundli’s failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelrod R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation Basic Books New York
Baland J.M., J.-P. Platteau, (1996), Halting Degradation of Natural Resources – Is There a Role for Local Communities? Oxford FAO, Clarendon
Baland J.-M., J.-P. Platteau, (1999) The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management World Development 27: 773–788
Baland, J.M. and Platteau, J.P.: 2002, ‘Collective action on the commons: the role of inequality’, http://www.eco.fundp.ac.be/recherche/cred/papers/inequality%20santa%20fe3.pdf accessed on June 29, 2005
Baland, J.M. and Platteau, J.P.: 2003, ‘Economics of common property management regimes’, in K.G. Maler and J. Vincent (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, North-Holland
CPCB: 2001, ‘Common effluent treatment plants’, Parivesh Newsletter, January 2001, Delhi, Central Pollution Control Board
Farell J., (1987) Information and coase theorem Journal of Economic Perspectives 1(2):13–29
Frohlich N., J. Oppenheimer, (1998) Solving collective action problems fairly: puzzles in policy design In: Loehman E.T., D.M. Kilgour, (eds). Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management Edward Elgar Cheltenham and Northampton, pp. 91–100
Gaspart F., M. Jabbar, C. Melard, J.P. Platteau, (1998) Participation in the construction of local public good with indivisibilities: an application to watershed development in Ethiopia Journal of African Economies 7(2):157–184
Gray B., (1989) Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco
Heckathorn D., (1993) Collective action and group heterogeneity: voluntary provision versus selective incentives American Sociological Review 58:329–350
Israngkura A., (2000) Thai industrial estate water treatment fee In: Rietbergen-McCracekn J., H. Abaza, (eds). Economic Instruments for Environmental Management Earthscan Publication London, pp. 86–91
Kantawala, D., Prabhu, S.M. and Shah, S.: 2000, ‘CETPs: an unfinished agenda of wastewater treatment in India’, http:/www.strategicnewspapers.com/tf/052100/case.htm accessed on May 2000
Kathuria V., (2001) Pollution: prevention vs control: is EOP treatment the solution? Economic and Political Weekly 36(July 21):2745–2748
Kathuria, V.: 2003, ‘Failure of collective action as an institution – lessons from Kundli, Haryana’, Working Paper, Delhi, Institute of Economic Growth
Kathuria V., (2004) Controlling pollution from SSIs, Economic and Political Weekly, 39(26):2445–2448
Kathuria, V. and Sterner, T.: 2005, ‘Monitoring and enforcement: is two-tier regulation robust? – a study of Ankleshwar, India’, Ecological Economics, forthcoming
Libecap G., (1994) The conditions for successful collective action Journal of Theoretical Politics 6:563–592
Loehman E.T., D.M. Kilgour, (1998) Introduction: social design for environmental and resource management In: Loehman E.T., D.M. Kilgour, (eds). Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management Edward Elgar Cheltenham and Northampton pp. 1–25
Mehta S., Mundle S., U. Sankar, (1997) Incentive and Regulation for Pollution Abatement Sage New Delhi
Murty M.N., A.J. James, S. Misra, (1999), Economics of Industrial Pollution Abatement: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Indian Experience Oxford University Press Delhi
National Productivity Council (1992) Report on the Design of a Common Effluent Treatment Plant NPC New Delhi
Olson M., (1965) The Logic of Collective Action Harvard University Press Cambridge, USA
Ostrom E., (1990) Governing the Commons Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
Ostrom E., (1998) The institutional analysis and development approach In: Loehman E.T., D.M. Kilgour, (eds). Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management Edward Elgar Cheltenham and Northampton pp. 68–90
Panjwani, A.: 2001, ‘Performance and problems of CETP – Ankleshwar’, Paper Presented in the Workshop on Common Effluent Treatment Plants held on July 28 at Ahmedabad, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar
Rawls J., (1971) A Theory of Justice Harvard University Press USA
Sankar U., (2001) Economic Analysis of Environmental Problems in Tanneries and Textile Bleaching and Dyeing Units and Suggestions for Policy Actions Allied Publishers New Delhi
Schlager E., W. Blomquist, (1998) Heterogeneity and common pool resource management In: Loehman E.T., D.M. Kilgour, (eds). Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management Edward Elgar Cheltenham and Northampton pp. 101–112
Schlager E., W. Blomquist, S.Y. Tang, (1994), Mobile flows, storage, and self organized institutions for governing common pool resources Land Economics 70:294–317
Soni, G.B.: 2001 ‘Status of CETPs in Gujarat’, Paper Presented in the Workshop on Common Effluent Treatment Plants held on July 28 at Ahmedabad, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar
Srinivasan J.T., (2005), State regulation versus co-management: evidence from the Cochin estuarine fisheries in India Environment and Development Economics 10:97–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kathuria, V. MANAGING POLLUTION FROM SSIs – DESIGNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE INSTITUTION. Environ Dev Sustain 9, 107–130 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9007-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9007-2