Abstract
Community networks are self-organized groupings that form for many different reasons. Some networks, connected mainly through bonding ties, are based on personal interests and relationships; others, based mainly on bridging ties, centre around broader interests. These networks form to create collective agency for engaging with social, environmental, and other issues through the concentration of social capital. The multi-scaled and evolutionary nature of sustainable development issues requires that community groups dedicated to engaging with such issues be particularly diverse, resilient, and flexible. As such, they must build a large number of bridging ties leading to external resources and limit the potential for bonding ties to impose constraining norms upon the group.
Over time, however, volunteer groups tend towards a state of homophily, the tendency of groups to form from similar actors and then become more similar with time. This tendency leads to a decrease in the number of the bridging ties that help to provide group agency. Homophily must be actively recognized within community sustainable development groups if they are to remain effective over the long term. This paper suggests methods to prevent and control group homophily drawn from experience in forming small, time-limited sustainable development networks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert R., Jeong H., Barabasi A., 2000, Error and attack tolerance of complex networks Nature 406: 378–383
Arenas A., Danon L., Diaz-Guilera A., Weiser P., Guimera R., 2004, Community analysis in social networks European Physical Journal B 38: 373–380
Ameral L., Ottino J., 2004 Complex networks European Physical Journal B 38: 147–162
Bhaskar R., 1994, Plato, Etc: The Problems of Philosophy and Their Resolution, Verso, New York
Bourdieu P., 1980, The Logic of Practice, Polity Press, Cambridge
Borgatti S., Foster P., 2003, The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology Journal of Management 29(6): 991–1013
Brundtland G., 1987, Our Common Future: World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, New York
Carley K., 1991, A theory of group stability American Sociological Review 56(3): 331–355
Coleman J., 1990, Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dale A., 2005, Social capital and sustainable community development: Is there a relationship? in: Dale A., Onyx J., (eds.), A Dynamic Balance: Social Capital and Sustainable Community Development, UBC Press, Vancouver
Dale A., 2001, At the Edge. Sustainable Development in the 21st Century, UBC Press, Vancouver
Dale A., Onyx J., 2005, A Dynamic Balance. Social Capital and Sustainable Community Development, UBC Press, Vancouver
Gargiulo M., Benassi M., 2000, Trapped in your own net? network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital Organization Science 11(2): 183–196
Gladwell M., 2000, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little Brown and Company, Boston
Granovetter M., 1973, The strength of weak ties The American Journal of Sociology. 78(6): 1360–1380
Harvey D., 2002, Agency and community: a critical realist paradigm Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 32(2): 163–194
Kiesner J., Poulin F., Nicotra E., 2003, Peer relations across contexts: network homophily and network inclusion in and after school Child Development 74(5): 1328–1343
Krishna A., 2001, Moving from the stock of social capital to the flow of benefits: the role of agency World Development 29(6): 925–943
Lesser E., Prusak L., 2000, Communities of practice, social capital and organizational Knowledge in E. Lesser, Fontaine M., Slasher J., (eds.), Knowledge and Communities, Butterworth Heinemann, Boston
Louch H., 2000, Personal network integration: transivity and homophily in strong tie relations Social Networks 22: 45–64
Mark N., 2003, Culture and competition: homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches American Sociological Review 68(3): 319–344
McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J., 2001, Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444
Narayan D., 1999, Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty, World Bank, Washington, DC
Nuclear Waste Management Organization. (2005) [accessed Agust 2nd, 2005]
Omerod P., Roach A., 2004, The medieval inquisition: scale free networks and the suppression of heresy Physica A 339: 645–652
Onyx J., Bullen P., 2000, Measuring social capital in five communities The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36(1): 23–42
Popielarz P., McPherson J., 1995, On the edge or in between: niche position, niche overlap, and the duration of voluntary association memberships American Journal of Sociology 101(3): 698–720
Portes A., 1998, Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24
Putnam R., 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York
Reuf M., 2002a, A structural event approach to the analysis of group composition Social Networks 24: 135–160
Ruef M., 2002b, Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3): 427–449
Reuf M, Aldrich H., Carter N., 2003, The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs American Sociological Review 68(2): 195–222
Rydin Y., Holman N., 2004, Re-evaluating the contribution of social capital in achieving sustainable development Local Environment 9(2): 117–133
Dale A., 2005, Social capital and sustainable community development: Is there a relationship? in: Dale A., Onyx J., (eds.), A Dynamic Balance: Social Capital and Sustainable Community Development, UBC Press, Vancouver
Volker B., Flap H., 2001, Weak ties as a liability: the case of east germany Rationality and Society 13(4): 397–428
Watts D., 2003, Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age, W.W. Norton, Company, New York
Wilson P., 1997, Building social capital: a learning agenda for the twenty first century Urban Studies 34(5/6): 745–760
Woolcock M., 2001, The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2(1): 11–17
Wright K., 2000, Perceptions of on-line support providers: an examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication, and social support within on-line groups Communication Quarterly 48(1): 44–59
Acknowledgement
We are indebted to our reviewers for strengthening this article, in particular, to Dr. Thomas Homer-Dixon for his suggestions concerning scale-free networks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newman, L., Dale, A. Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks. Environ Dev Sustain 9, 79–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5