Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-Term Emission Factors for Land Application of Treated Organic Municipal Waste

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The agro-ecosystem model Daisy was used to explore the long-term fate of nitrogen (N) after land application of compost and digestate (based on source separated organic municipal solid waste (MSW)). The cumulative crop N yield response and emissions for mineral fertilizer (MF), anaerobically digested organic waste (MSW-D), and composted organic waste (MSW-C) were derived by fitting a linear mixed model to the outcomes of the simulations. The non-linearity of crop N yield responses and emission responses to increasing N fertilizer application was addressed by dividing these responses into high and low crop response conditions. The crop N yield response and five emission pathways (NO3 leaching to groundwater, NO3 and NH4 + loss to surface water, and NH3 and N2O emissions into the atmosphere) were quantified as environmental inventory factors, which were calculated for both high and low response conditions. The crop N yield response cumulated over time from the application of N fertilizer almost levelled out for MF within 3 to 5 years after application, while it increased over a time period of 100 years for MSW-C. In addition, MSW-D showed features of both MF and MSW-C, a steep rise in crop N yield response due to high inorganic N content and a gradual increase thereafter, due to the slow mineralization of organic N. Overall, 52–69 % of N applied as MF was up-taken by plant biomass, while plant uptakes of 15–28 % by MSW-D and 19–29 % by MSW-C were measured under high response conditions. When the N fertilizer application rate exceeded the rate of plant uptake, the rate of N utilization dropped by 80–90 % for MF, albeit to lesser degree for MSW-D and MSW-C. The simulations showed that emissions to the environment from organic fertilizers took place over a longer time and omission of the longs-term effects could result in underestimation of potential impacts to the environment. As well as the time scope of assessment, local conditions were determining the N emissions. For the N2O emission, there were very small differences between high and low response conditions for organic fertilizer. The N2O emission factors varied for 1.8–3.0 % for MSW-D and 1.7–5.1 % for MSW-C. For NO3 leaching to groundwater, there were large differences between high and low response conditions. For high response conditions, the emission factors varied from 6 to 39, 17 to 68, and 9 to 59 of input N from the application of MF, MSW-D, and MSW-C, respectively. Under low response conditions, much higher leaching emission factors were estimated ranging from 21 to 61 % for MF, 20 to 73 % for MSW-D, and 11 to 66 % for MSW-C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galloway, J. N., & Cowling, E. B. (2002). Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of change. Ambio, 31(2), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabrera, M. L., Kissel, D. E., & Vigil, M. F. (2005). Nitrogen mineralization from organic residues: research opportunities. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 75–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruun, S., Hansen, T. L., Christensen, T. H., Magid, J., & Jensen, L. S. (2006). Application of processes organic municipal solid waste on agricultural land—a scenario analysis. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 11(3), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, T. L., Bhander, G. S., Christensen, T. H., Bruun, S., & Jensen, L. S. (2006). Life cycle modeling of environmental impacts of application of processed organic municipal solid waste on agricultural land (EASEWASTE). Waste Management Research, 24, 153–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dufosse, K., Gabrielle, B., Drouet, J. L., & Bessou, C. (2013). Using agroecosystem modeling to improve the estimates of N2O emission in the life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 4(3), 593–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Børgesen, C. D., Djurhuus, J., & Kyllingsbæk, A. (2001). Estimating the effect of legislation on nitrogen leaching by up scaling field simulation. Ecological Modeling, 136(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Britz, W., & Leip, A. (2009). Development of marginal emission factor for N loses from agricultural soil with DNDC-CAPRI meta-model. Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment, 113, 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boldrin, A., Neidel, T. L., Damgaard, A., Bhander, G. S., Møller, J., & Christensen, T. H. (2011). Modeling of environmental impacts from biological treatment of organic municipal waste in EASEWSTE. Waste Management, 31(4), 619–630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen, S., Jensen, H. E., Nielsen, N. E., & Svendsen, H. (1991). Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter wheat using the Danish simulation model DAISY. Fertilizer Research, 27, 234–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abrahamsen, P., & Hansen, S. (2000). Daisy: an open soil-crop-atmosphere system model. Environmental Modeling and Software, 15, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen, S., Abrahamsen, P., Petersen, C. T., & Styczen, M. (2012). Daisy: model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4), 1315–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, P., Smith, J. U., Powlson, D. S., McGill, W. B., Arah, J. R. M., Chertov, O. G., Coleman, K., Franco, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D. S., Jensen, L. S., Kelly, R. H., Klein-Gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A. S., Li, C., Molina, J. A. E., Mueller, T., Parton, W. J., Thornley, J. H. M., & Whitmore, A. P. (1997). A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma, 81, 153–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krobel, R., Sun, Q., Ingwersen, J., Chen, X., Zhang, F., Muller, T., & Romheld, V. (2010). Modelling water dynamics with DNDC and DAISY in a soil of the North China Plain: a comparative study. Environmental Modeling and Software, 25, 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luxhøj, J., Bruun, S., Jensen, L. S., Magid, J., Jensen, A., & Larsen, T. (2007). Modelling C and N mineralization during decomposition of anaerobically digested and composted municipal solid waste. Waste Management Research, 23, 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshida, H., Nielsen, M. P., Scheutz, C., Jensen, L. S., Christensen, T. H., Nielsen, S., Bruun, S. (2015). Effects of sewage sludge stabilization on fertilizer value and greenhouse gas emissions after soil application. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Plant Soil Science. Accepted for publication March 2015.

  16. Styczen, M., Hansen, S., Jensen, L. S., Svendsen, H., Abrahamsen, P., Børgesen, C. D., Thirup, C.,& Østergaard, H. S. (2004). Standardopstillinger til Daisy-modellen. Vejledning og baggrund. Version 1.2, april 2006. DHI Institut for Vand og Miljø, 62 pp.

  17. StatBank Denmark, 2012. Statistics Denmark – www.StatBank.dk/agf1. Accessed on August 16, 2012.

  18. Vinther, F. P. (2005). SimDen—a simple model for quantifying denitrification and N2O emission. In: Stensberg, M., Nilsson, H., Brynjolfsson, R., Kapuinen, P., Morken, J. & Birkmose, T.S. (eds.). Manure—an agronomic and environmental challenge. NJF-seminar no. 372, 5-6 September 2005, Nils Holgerssongymnasiet, Skurup, Sweden.

  19. Bates, D.M., & Maechler, M. (2009). lme4: linear mixed—effects model using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-32.

  20. Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries (2012). Vejledning om gødsknings og harmoniregler - Planperioden 1. august 2012 til 31. juli 2013. ISBN 978-87-7120-342-4.

  21. Sommer, S. G., Genermont, S., Cellier, P., Hutchings, N. J., Olesen, J. E., & Morvan, T. (2003). Processess controlling ammonia emission from livestock slurry in the field. European Journal of Agronomy, 19(4), 465–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amlinger, F., Götz, B., Dreher, P., Getzti, J., & Weissteiner, C. (2003). Nitrogen in biowaste and yard waste compost: dynamics of mobilization and availability—a review. European Journal of Soil Biology, 39, 107–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Svensson, K., Odlare, M., & Pell, M. (2004). The fertilizer effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste. Journal of Agricultural Science, 142, 461–467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Odlare, M., Arthurson, V., Pell, M., Svensson, K., Nehrenheim, E., & Abubaker, J. (2011). Land application of organic waste—effects on the soil ecosystem. Applied Energy, 88, 2210–2218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Delin, S., & Stenberg, M. (2014). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on nitrate leaching in relation to grain yield response on loamy sand in Sweden. European Journal of Agronomy, 52, 291–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lord, I. E., & Mitchell, R. D. J. (1998). Effect of nitrogen input to cereals on nitrate leaching from sandy soils. Soil Use and Management, 14, 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Diacono, M., & Montemurro, F. (2010). Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 401–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Anvendelse af affald til jordbrugsformål. Vejledning fra Miljøstyrelsen Nr. 1 2010. Miljøministeriet. Accessible online at http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2010/978-87-92668-73-8/pdf/978-87-92668-74-5.pdf (In Danish). Accessed August 20, 1013.

  29. Winther, S. (2003). Proceedings from 7th HELCOM PITF Regional Workshop. Germany: Lübeck. The Danish nitrate policy.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, R. J. N., Glegg, G. A., Parkinson, R., & Richards, J. P. (2007). Evaluating the implementation of the Nitrate Directive in Denmark and England using an actor-oriented approach. European Environment, 17, 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheriff, G. (2005). Efficient waste? Way farmers over-apply nutrients and the implication for policy design. Applied Economy Perspective and Policy, 27(4), 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroko Yoshida.

Additional information

Highlights

The fate of C and N after land application of treated organic waste was modelled by the DAISY model.

Time-dependent environmental inventory factors were derived based on the outcome of more than 20,000 simulations covering a 100-year period.

Non-linearity was captured by dividing the crop response into low and high crop response conditions.

Increase in crop N yield and N emissions from treated organic waste appears to persist over a long period.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 7586 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, H., Nielsen, M.P., Scheutz, C. et al. Long-Term Emission Factors for Land Application of Treated Organic Municipal Waste. Environ Model Assess 21, 111–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9471-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9471-5

Keywords

Navigation