Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analytical solution and mechanisms of fluid production from hydraulically fractured wells with finite fracture conductivity

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive study of the physical mechanisms of fluid production from a well intersected by a narrow elliptically shaped vertical fracture with finite fracture conductivity is carried out using a newly obtained analytical solution. The flow pattern, flux density distribution along the fracture surface, and fluid production rate are analyzed systematically with respect to finite fracture conductivity. The simplicity of the new analytical solution reveals many physical insights not attainable from existing analytical or numerical solutions. It is shown that the nearly singular pressure gradient developed at the fracture tip induces the reservoir flow to converge to and focus at the tip region, promoting flux density along the entire fracture surface and enhancing the production rate. It is established that the flow in the reservoir is a superposition of two basic flows, a confocal elliptical flow responsible for the fluid production, and a redistributive nonproducing flow induced by a finite fracture conductivity that draws fluids out of the fracture from the part near the tip and redeposits them back to the part of the fracture close to the wellbore. An explicit analytical formula for the fluid production rate is also derived that exhibits a simple dependency on the dimensionless fracture conductivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarkson CR (2013) Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: review of theory and best practices. Int J Coal Geol 109–110:101–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ratts PAC (2007) Uptake of water from soils by plant roots. Transp Porous Med 68:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roose T, Schnepf A (2008) Mathematical models for plant–soil interaction. Phil Trans R Soc A 366:4597–4611

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Prats M (1961) Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior—incompressible fluid case. SPE J 1(2):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prats M, Hazebroek P, Strickler WR (1962) Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior—compressible fluids case. SPE J 2(2):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raghavan R, Cady GV, Ramey HJ Jr (1972) Well-test analysis for vertically fractured wells. J Pet Technol 24(8):1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gringarten AC, Ramsey HJ Jr (1974) Unsteady pressure distribution created by a well with a single infinite-conductivity vertical fracture. SPE J 14:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gringarten AC, Ramey HJ Jr, Raghavan R (1975) Applied pressure analysis for fractured wells. J Pet Technol 27(7):887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Earlougher R (1977) Advances in well test analysis. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cinco-Ley H, Samaniego VF, Dominguez AN (1978) Transient pressure behavior for a well with a finite-conductivity vertical fracture. SPE J 18(4):253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal RG, Carter RD, Pollock CB (1979) Evaluation and performance prediction of low-permeability gas wells stimulated by massive hydraulic fracturing. J Pet Technol 31(3):362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuchuk FJ, Brigham WE (1979) Transient flow in elliptical systems. SPE J 19(6):401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuchuk FJ, Brigham WE (1981) Unsteady-state water influx in elliptic and anisotropic reservoir/aquifer systems. SPE J 21(3):309–314

  14. Cinco-Ley H, Samaniego VF (1981) Transient pressure analysis for fractured wells. J Pet Technol 33(9):1749–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee ST, Brockenbrough JR (1986) A new approximate analytic solution for finite-conductivity vertical fractures. SPE Form Eval 1(1):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Obuto ST, Ertekin T (1987) A composite system solution in elliptic flow geometry. SPE Form Eval 2(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkinson DJ (1989) New results for pressure transient behavior of hydraulically-fractured wells. SPE Paper 18950

  18. Riley MF (1991) Finite conductivity fractures in elliptical coordinates. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford

  19. Valko P, Economides MJ (1995) Hydraulic fracture mechanics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bourdet D (2002) Well test analysis: the use of advanced interpretation models. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer B, Jacot R (2005) Pseudosteady-state analysis of finite conductivity vertical fractures. SPE Paper 95941

  22. Amini S, IIik D, Blasingame TA (2007) Evaluation of the elliptical flow period for hydraulically-fractured wells in tight gas sands-theoretical aspects and practical considerations. SPE Paper 106308

  23. Kamal M, Abbaszadeh M, Cinco-Ley H, Hegeman P, Horne R, Houze O, Kabir S, Kikani J, Kuchuk F, Landa J, Murray M, Ozkan E, Raghavan R, Samaniego F, Soliman M (2009) Transient well testing. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ozkan E (2012) Releasing shale gas potential with fractured horizontal wells. SPE Distinguished Lecture

  25. Biryukov D, Kuchuk FJ (2012) Transient pressure behavior of reservoirs with discrete conductive faults and fractures. Transp Porous Med 95:239–268

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Economides MJ, Nolte KG (eds) (2000) Reservoir stimulation, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen KP, Jin Y, Chen M (2013) Pressure-gradient singularity and production enhancement for hydraulically-fractured wells. Geophys J Int 195:923–931

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lafe OE, Montes JS, Cheng AH-D, Liggett JA, Liu PL-F (1980) Singularities in Darcy flow through porous media. J Hydraul Div Proc ASCE 106(HY6):977

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phillips OM (1991) Flow and reactions in permeable rocks. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kikani J (1995) Flux determination of finite conductivity fractures using higher order interpolation functions. SPE Adv Technol Ser 3(1):76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chin WC (2002) Quantitative methods in reservoir engineering. Gulf Professional Publishing, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  32. Matthäi SK, Belayneh M (2004) Fluid flow partitioning between fractures and a permeable rock matrix. Geophys Res Lett 31(7):L07602

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathias SA, van Reeuwijk M (2009) Hydraulic fracture propagation with 3-D leak-off. Transp Porous Med 80(3):1573–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mathias SA, Tsang C, van Reeuwijk M (2010) Investigation of hydromechanical processes during cyclic extraction recovery testing of a deformable rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(3):517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Exadaktylos G (2012) A study of the transient fluid flow around a semi-infinite crack. Int J Solids Struct 49(23–24):3323–3334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pouya A (2012) Three-dimensional flow in fractured porous media: a potential solution based on singular integral equations. Adv Water Res 35:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pouya A, Ghabezloo S (2010) Flow around a crack in a porous matrix and related problems. Transp Porous Med 84:511–532

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Pouya A, Vu MN (2012) Fluid flow and effective permeability of an infinite matrix containing disc-shaped cracks. Adv Water Res 42:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng Y, Lee WJ, McVay DA (2009) A new approach for reliable estimation of hydraulic fracture properties using elliptical flow data in tight gas wells. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 12(2):254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Craft BC, Hawkins M (1959) Applied petroleum reservoir engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this work was provided by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation Grant 51234006. K. P. Chen is partially supported by the National Science Foundation and the Donors of the Petroleum Research Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102200, China

    Yan Jin & Mian Chen

  2. School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-6106, USA

    Kang Ping Chen

Authors
  1. Yan Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kang Ping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mian Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang Ping Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Y., Chen, K.P. & Chen, M. Analytical solution and mechanisms of fluid production from hydraulically fractured wells with finite fracture conductivity. J Eng Math 92, 103–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9754-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9754-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation