Skip to main content
Log in

A theory for the impact of a wave breaking onto a permeable barrier with jet generation

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We model a water wave impact onto a porous breakwater. The breakwater surface is modelled as a thin barrier composed of solid matter pierced by channels through which water can flow freely. The water in the wave is modelled as a finite-length volume of inviscid, incompressible fluid in quasi-one-dimensional flow during its impact and flow through a typical hole in the barrier. The fluid volume moves at normal incidence to the barrier. After the initial impact the wave water starts to slow down as it passes through holes in the barrier. Each hole is the source of a free jet along whose length the fluid velocity and width vary in such a way as to conserve volume and momentum at zero pressure. We find there are two types of flow, depending on the porosity, β, of the barrier. If β is in the range 0 ≤ β < 0.5774 then the barrier is a strong impediment to the flow, in that the fluid velocity tends to zero as time tends to infinity. But if β is in the range 0.5774 ≤ β ≤ 1 then the barrier only temporarily holds up the flow, and the decelerating wave water passes through in a finite time. We report results for the velocity and impact pressure due to the incident wave water, and for the evolving shape of the jet, with examples from both types of impact. We account for the impulse on the barrier and the conserved kinetic energy of the flow. Consideration of small β gives insight into the sudden changes in flow and the high pressures that occur when a wave impacts a nearly impermeable seawall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagnold RA (1939) Interim report on wave pressure research. Proc Inst Civ Eng 12: 201–226

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor GI (1943) A formulation of Mr. Tuck’s conception of Munroe jets. In: Batchelor GK (ed) The scientific papers of Sir Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, New York

  3. Birkhoff G, MacDougall DP, Pugh EM, Taylor GI (1948) Explosives with lined cavities. J Appl Phys 19: 563–582

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhoff G, Zarantonello EH (1957) Jets wakes and cavities. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Korobkin AA, Yilmaz O (2009) The initial stage of the dam-break problem. J Eng Math 63: 293–308

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Howison SD, Ockendon JR, Wilson SK (1991) Incompressible water-entry problems at small deadrise angles. J Fluid Mech 222: 215–230

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner H. (1932) Gleitvorgange an der oberflache von flussigkeiten. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 12: 193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faltinsen O (1993) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Howison SD, Ockendon JR, Oliver J, Purvis R, Smith FT (2005) Droplet impact on a thin fluid layer. J Fluid Mech 542: 1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. King AC, Needham DJ (1994) The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction I. A uniformly accelerating plate. J Fluid Mech 268: 89–101

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Needham DJ, Chamberlain R, Billingham J (2008) The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction. Part 3. An inclined accelerating plate. Q J Mech Appl Math 61: 581–614

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooker MJ (2002) Unsteady pressure fields which precede the launch of free surface liquid jets. Proc R Soc Lond A 458: 473–488

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooker MJ (2010) The flip-through of a plane inviscid jet. J Eng Math 67: 137–152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood DJ, Peregrine DH (2000) Wave impact on a wall using pressure impulse theory: 2. Porous berm. J Waterw Coast Ocean Eng 126(4): 191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanden-Broeck J-M, Keller JB (1982) Jets rising and falling under gravity. J Fluid Mech 124: 335–345

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Parau EI, Decent SP, Simmons MJH, Wong DCY, King AC (2007) Nonlinear viscous liquid jets from a rotating orifice. J Eng Math 57: 159–179

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooker MJ, Peregrine DH (1995) Pressure-impulse theory for liquid impact problems. J Fluid Mech 297: 193–214

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Bredmose H, Hunt-Raby A, Jayaratne R, Bullock GN (2010) The ideal flip-through impact: experimental and numerical investigation. J Eng Math 67: 115–136

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark J. Cooker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooker, M.J. A theory for the impact of a wave breaking onto a permeable barrier with jet generation. J Eng Math 79, 1–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9558-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9558-9

Keywords

Navigation