Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring trade specialization dynamics: the case of Romania and Bulgaria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyzes the evolution of trade specialization in Romania and Bulgaria beginning with the mid-1990s–2012. Methodologically, two statistical methods are applied: cross-section analysis and the Markov chain technique. These methods are used both to establish a link between different distributions of trade specialization indicators in time and to find out if Romania and Bulgaria have mainly specialized in competitive or non-competitive products. Although the main acceding countries to European Union had registered an increasing degree of specialization, our results indicate an opposite trend for the two countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiginger K (2001) Specialization of European manufacturing. Austrian Econ Q 2:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessandrini M, Fattouh B, Scaramozzino P (2007) The changing pattern of foreign trade specialization in Indian manufacturing. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 23(2):270–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amador J, Cabral S, Maria J (2009) What can we learn from the distribution of trade patterns? Evidence for Portugal, Spain, Greece and Ireland. Retrieved Sept 1, 2013, from http://docentes.fe.unl.pt/~jamador/ETSG_v1.pdf

  • Amiti M (1999) Specialization patterns in Europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135:573–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and “Revealed” comparative advantage. Manch School Econ Soc Stud 33:99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1977) “Revealed” comparative advantage revisited: an analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953–1971. Manch School Econ Soc Stud 45:327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban IM (2009) Romania’s trade patterns before admission to EU in January 2007. Studia Oecon 54(2):72–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojnec Š, Fertő I (2010) Southeastern European agrofood trade specialization. East EurEcon 48(3):22–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasili A, Epifani P, Helg R (2000) On the dynamics of trade patterns. De Econ 148(2):233–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell J (1989) Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappini R (2013) Persistence vs. mobility in industrial and technological specialisation: evidence from 11 Euro area countries

  • Craig BA, Sendi PP (2002) Estimation of the transitionmatrix of a discrete-time Markov chain. Health Econ 11:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalum B, Laursen K, Villumsen G (1998) Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: de-specialisation and ‘stickness’. Int Rev Appl Econ 12(3):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertő I (2007) The dynamics of trade in central and Eastern European countries. Manag Global Transit 5(1):5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertő I, Soós KA (2008) Trade specialization in the European Union and in postcommunist European countries. East Eur Econ 46(3):5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart PE (1976) The dynamics of earnings, 1963–1973. Econ J 86(3):551–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman P (1985) Market structure and foreign trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham N, Lin L (2009). On pth roots of stochastic matrices. Retrieved Oct 1, 2013, from http://eprints.ma.man.ac.uk/1241/01/paper9.pdf

  • Krugman P (1987) The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies. J Dev Econ 27(1):41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafay G (1992) The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. In: Dagenais MG, Muet PA (eds) International trade modelling. Chapman and Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martincus CV (2003) Changing specialization patterns in Mercosur. Retrieved Sept 15, 2013, from http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2003/papers/martincus.pdf

  • Michaely M (1984) Trade, income levels and dependence. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudman J, Redding S (2000) Evolving patterns of international trade. Rev Int Econ 8(3):373–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37:426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40:1353–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding S (2002) Specialization dynamics. J Int Econ 58:299–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stângaciu OA (2011) The dynamic of regional trade specialisation pattern in Romania. CES working papers, pp 336–354

  • Vavryshchuk V (2007) Ukraine’s trade specialization. Probl Econ Transit 50(7):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath TL (1991) A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127(2):265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong K (1995) International trade in goods and factor mobility. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wörz J (2005) Dynamics of trade specialization in developed and less developed countries. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 41(3):92–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz B, Ergun SJ (2003) The foreign trade pattern and foreign trade specialization of candidates of the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.ezoneplus.org/archiv/ezp_wp_19.pdf

  • Young A (1991) Learning-by-doing and dynamic effects of international trade. Quart J Econ 106(2):396–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaghini A (2005) Evolution of trade patterns in the new EU member states. Econ Transit 13(4):629–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Marilena Ban.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7 and 8.

Table 7 Results for 1-year transition matrices and the corresponding mobility indexes in Romania
Table 8 Adjusted 1-year transition matrix for Romania

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ban, I.M. Measuring trade specialization dynamics: the case of Romania and Bulgaria. Empirica 44, 229–248 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9317-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9317-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation