Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

People’s perception on impacts of hydro-power projects in Bhagirathi river valley, India

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The people’s perception on environmental and socio-economic impacts due to three hydro-electric projects (HEPs; commissioned and under construction) were studied in the north-west Indian Himalaya. Surveys among 140 project-affected people (PAPs) using a checklist of impacts indicate that among the negative impacts, decrease in flora/fauna, agriculture, flow of river, aesthetic beauty; and increase in water pollution, river bed quarrying for sand/stone, human settlement on river banks and social evils; and among the positive impacts, increase in standard of living, road connectivity, means of transport, public amenities, tourism and environmental awareness were related with HEPs. The PAPs tend to forget the negative impacts with the age of the HEPs after it becomes functional, and the positive impacts seem to outweigh the negative impacts. Study concludes that it is difficult to separate the compounding impacts due to HEP construction and other anthropogenic and natural factors, and in the absence of cause-and-effect analyses, it is hard to dispel the prevailing notion that HEPs are undesirable in the study area that led to agitations by the environmentalists and stopped construction of one of these HEPs. To overcome the situation, multi-disciplinary scientific studies involving the PAPs need to be carried out in planning and decision-making to make HEPs environment friendly and sustainable in this region. There is also a need to adopt low carbon electric power technologies and promote a decentralized energy strategy through joint ventures between public and private companies utilizing locally available renewable energy resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, N. C., & Gopendra, K. (1973). Geology of the upper Bhagirathi and Yamuna valleys, Uttarkashi District, Kumaun Himalaya. Himalayan Geology, 3, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, D. K., Lodhi, M. S., & Panwar, S. (2010). Are EIA studies sufficient for projected hydropower development in the Indian Himalayan region? Current Science, 98(2), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alley, K. D., Hile, R., & Mitra, C. (2014). Visualizing hydropower across the Himalayas: mapping in a time of regulatory decline. Himalaya, 34(2), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballabh, H., Pillay, S., Negi, G. C. S., & Pillay, K. (2014). Relationship between selected physiographic features and landslide occurrence around four hydropower projects in Bhagirathi valley of Uttarakhand, Western Himalaya, India. International Journal of Geosciences, 5, 1088–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, A. (2002). Hydropower potential and developmental activities. Energy Policy, 30, 1231–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruah, D., Hazarika, L., Bakalial, B., Borah, S., Dutta, R., & Biswas, S. (2012). A grave danger for the Ganges dolphin (Platanista gangetica Roxburgh) in the Subansiri river due to a large hydroelectric project. The Environmentalist, 32(10), 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavadam, L. 2003a. Narmada Valley Project: rising concerns. Frontline. http://www.hinduonnet.com /fline/fl2012/stories /20030620002404100.html (February 24, 2009).

  • Bavadam, L. 2003b. Development: the Bilgaon model. Frontline. http://www.flonnet.com/fl2012/stories/20031024001208700.htm (February 24, 2009).

  • Bhatt, J. P., Nautiyal, P., & Singh, H. R. (2004). Status (1993-1994) of the endangered fish Himalayan Mahseer (Tor putitora Hamilton) (Cyprinidae) in the mountain reaches of the river Ganga. Asian Fish Science, 17, 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrapani, G. J., & Saini, R. K. (2009). Temporal and spatial variations in water discharge and sediment load in the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi Rivers in Himalaya, India. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 35, 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, M. E. 1995. Case study of reservoir sedimentation in the Western Ghat Region of Kerala. In: Anonymous, Ed., Environmental impact assessment studies (Case Studies), Central Board of Irrigation and Power, Pub. No. 248. New Delhi,192–197.

  • Chandy, T., Keenan, R. J., Petheram, R. J., & Shepherd, P. (2012). Impacts of hydropower development on rural livelihood sustainability in Sikkim, India: community perceptions. Mountain Research and Development, 32(2), 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A., Pratap, D., Sinclair, A. J., & Deane, S. (2013). Perceptions of impacts, public participation, and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India. Land Use Policy, 33, 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, R., & Sarma, S. K. (2012). Lower Subansiri hydroelectric power project and future of the Subansiri river ecosystem. Annals of Biological Research, 3(6), 2953–2957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Statistics. (2015). Central statistics office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. New Delhi: Govt. of India (22nd Issue) (www.mospi.gov.in).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. S. (2004). Environmental impact of water resources projects-an overview. Indian Journal of Power and River Valley Development, 53(3), 31–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govt. of Uttarakhand. (2015). 24x7 Power for All Uttarakhand—A joint initiative of Government of India and Government of Uttarakhand (powermin.nic.in/Uttarakhand).

  • Jain, S. K. (2015). Assessment of environmental flow requirements for hydropower projects in India. Current Science, 108(10), 1815–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandari, P. (2013). Migration pattern and the increasing participation of females in the economy of hill rural areas: a case study of Pauri district in Uttarakhand. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(5), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katoch, A., Guleria, J., & Kumar, A. 2014. Impact of Nathpa Jhakri Hydroelectric Power Project on the environment and livelihood in Kinnaur and Shimla Districts of Himachal Pradesh. Report 71. Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi.

  • Kumar, P., Chaube, U., & Mishra, S. K. 2007. Environmental flows for hydropower projects—a case study. International Conference on Small Hydropower. Hydro Sri Lanka. 22–24 October, 2007.

  • Kuniyal, J. C., & Sharma, R. (2008). Environmental assessment of hydropower projects in the Himalayan Beas Valley of Himachal State, India. In A. L. Singh & S. Fazal (Eds.), Rural environmental management (pp. 227–268). Delhi: B.R. Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lata, R., Rishi, M. S., Kochhar, N., & Sharma, R. (2013). Socio-economic impacts of Sorang hydro-electric project in district Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 3(3), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Non-Renewable Energy, Govt. of India 2010. Biomass Resource Atlas of India. (http://lab.cgpl.iisc.ernet.in/atlas/Default.aspx).

  • Mukherjee, P. (2012). EIA scams: decaying the EIA legal regime in India. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 6, 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, B. S. K. (1995). Environmental aspects of dam construction positive impacts. In: Anonymous (ed.) Environmental impact assessment studies (Case Studies), Central Board of Irrigation and Power. Pub. No. 248. New Delhi. 267–272.

  • Naithani, N. P. (1992). Study of quaternary sediments along Bhagirathi river between Maneri and Gangnani area, District Uttarkashi Garhwal, Himalaya (U.P). D. Phil. Thesis. Garhwal University, Srinagar.

  • Nautiyal, P., Pokhriyal, R. C., Rawat, D. S., & Singh, H. R. 1988. Maneri Dam on the River Bhagirathi—a lacustrinre Environment in the making. Proc. Nat. Symp. Past, Present and Future of Bhopal Lakes. 175–182.

  • Negi, G. C. S. (2011). Environmental and social impacts of hydropower projects in Ganga River basin (between Dharasu and Gangotri) in Uttarakhand. Final technical report submitted to MoEF & CC. New Delhi: Govt. of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padel, F. (2011). Sacrificing people: invasions of a tribal landscape. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, M. K., & Grumbine, R. E. (2012). Potential effects of ongoing and proposed hydropower development on terrestrial biological diversity in the Indian Himalaya. Conservation Biology, 26(6), 1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panwar, S., Agarwal, D. K., Negi, G. C. S., Kanwal, K. S., Sharma, V., Lodhi, M. S., Singh, J., & Bhatt, V. (2010). Impact assessment of a hydro-electric project on the flora in the western Himalayan region based on vegetation analysis and socio-economic studies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(7), 907–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N., Sati, S. P., & Sundriyal, Y. P. 2007. Socio-economic and environmental implication of the hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 344–353.

  • Semwal, N., & Akolkar, P. (2006). Hydro-biological assessment of water quality of river Bhagirathi with reference to Hydel Projects in Uttaranchal India. Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 10(2), 54–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. C. (1988). Fish and fisheries of the snow fed river Bhagirathi of Garhwal Himalayas. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India. 58 B II:181–192.

  • Sharma, H. K., & Rana, P. K. (2014). Assessing the impact of hydroelectric project construction on the rivers of district Chamba of Himachal Pradesh in the Northwest Himalaya, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. K., Sharma, V. K., & Gupta, A. (2000). Environmental impact of run of the river hydro power projects. In R. S. Goel (Ed.), Environmental management in hydropower and river valley projects (p. 267). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, E., Bhuchar, S., Xing, M., & Kothyari, B. P. (2007). Land use change and its impacts on hydroecological linkages in Himalayan watersheds. Tropical Ecology, 48(2), 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Kuniyal, J. C., Agarwal, D. K., & Sharma, J. C. (2008). Role of environmental impact assessment and public involvement in sustainable development of hydropower projects in the mountains-a case of the Beas Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Power and River Valley Development, 58, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P. R., & Chaturvedi, V. (2012). Low carbon and clean energy scenarios for India: analysis of targets approach. Energy Economics, 34(3), S487–S495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. S. (2006). Sustainable development of the Indian Himalayan region: linking ecological and economic concerns. Current Science, 90(8), 784–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (2014). Women, environment and sustainable development: a case study of Khul Gad micro watershed of Kumaun Himalaya. Space and Culture India, 1(3), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. P., & Thadani, R. (2015). Complexities and controversies in Himalayan research: a call for collaboration and rigor for better data. Mountain Research and Development, 35(4), 401–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K., & Singh, D. K. (2005). Glimpse of the plant wealth of Uttaranchal, Bishen Singh and Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun. 35.

  • Tayemg, R. (2015). Hydropower dams and development: local perspectives. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 5(1), 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. H. L., & Admas, W. M. (1999). Adapting to dams: agrarian change downstream of the Tiga dam, Northern Nigeria. World Development, 27(6), 919–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India (Grant No. J-12011/43/2008-IA.I Dt. 09-03-2009). Authors are thankful to Prof. Alan Diduck, Department of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Centre for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada, for constructive suggestions on an initial draft of this ms. and Prof. Kelly D. Alley, Auburn University, for inputs. One of the authors (GCS) thankfully acknowledge the facilities provided by the Director, G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, and the project staff (Dr. R. Joshi, H.B. Kuniyal, Meenakshi and A. Shaily) for help in field work. Dr. R.L. Semwal and PAPs of the study area for useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. C. S. Negi.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Perceptions of PAPs of MB-I HEP-affected villages (average values across 38 checklists of impacts)
Table 4 Perceptions of PAPs of MB-II HEP-affected villages (average values across 59 checklists of impacts)
Table 5 Perceptions of PAPs of LNP HEP-affected villages (average values across 43 checklists of impacts)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negi, G.C.S., Punetha, D. People’s perception on impacts of hydro-power projects in Bhagirathi river valley, India. Environ Monit Assess 189, 138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5820-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5820-y

Keywords

Navigation