What are the socioeconomic implications of the value chain of biodiversity products? A case study in Northeastern Brazil

  • Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva
  • Laura Jane Gomes
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-5772-2

Cite this article as:
da Silva, R.R.V., Gomes, L.J. & Albuquerque, U.P. Environ Monit Assess (2017) 189: 64. doi:10.1007/s10661-017-5772-2

Abstract

The trade in biodiversity products has gained increasing importance in conservation and livelihood strategies. The aim of this study is to describe and analyze the socioeconomic aspects and dynamics of the production and commercialization of two important products of Brazilian biodiversity from the fruits of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. and Dimorphandra gardneriana Tul. Interviews were conducted with who were involved in the various stages of value chains. Data were analyzed under an analytical/descriptive approach. It was found that the two value chains under study, although they share the same production environment and workforce, are different models of the commercial appropriation of the forest environment: one is related to local traditions, whereas the other seeks to meet an industry-related demand originating from a multinational pharmaceutical company. Harvesters become highly dependent on the trends imposed by these markets. Thus, it is clear that promoting these products as a conservation strategy requires an understanding of how their value chains arise, are established, and operate.

Keywords

Plant extractivismEthnobiologyEthnoecologyLivelihoodNon-timber forest productsPlant management

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva
    • 1
  • Laura Jane Gomes
    • 2
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Área de Engenharia FlorestalUniversidade Federal de AlagoasRio LargoBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências FlorestaisUniversidade Federal de SergipeSão CristóvãoBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas SocioecológicosUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoRecifeBrazil