Skip to main content
Log in

A classification system for large reservoirs of the contiguous United States

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Degradation of reservoir fish habitat has become a serious concern. Habitat issues—such as sedimentation, excessive nutrient loadings, and lack of submerged structure—may emerge and worsen over time and are accompanied by undesirable shifts in the fish community and fisheries. To prioritize habitat rehabilitation efforts in reservoirs, we developed a classification system for large reservoirs in the contiguous U.S. We used a four-step classification approach based on over 50 variables descriptive of habitat impairment in a sample of almost 1300 reservoirs. To account for the broad geographic heterogeneity in climate and landscape, reservoirs were assigned to a spatial framework relevant to aquatic resources, selected based on how well it recognized regional differences in fish habitat. To account for differences among reservoirs within geographical regions, we used cluster analysis to identify classes of reservoirs with similar characteristics. Classes were compared regarding habitat impairment, the fish community, the recreational fishery, and other variables from an external dataset to seek support for the classification system. A method for classifying new reservoirs not included in the original sample was also developed. The resulting classification system identified nine geographical regions distributed throughout the contiguous U.S. and 24 reservoir classes within the nine regions. The system can serve as the framework for a reservoir assessment mechanism. Our approach may be applicable elsewhere a broad-scale dataset is not available and needs to be obtained quickly and inexpensively, whether in regards to fish habitat or other environmental information needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinho, A. A., Miranda, L. E., Bini, L. M., Gomes, L. C., Thomaz, S. M., & Suzuki, H. I. (1999). Patterns of colonization in neotropical reservoirs, and prognoses on aging. In J. G. Tundisi & M. Straškraba (Eds.), Theoretical reservoir ecology and its applications (pp. 227–265). Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulley, H. N. N., Merchant, J. W., Marx, D. B., Holz, J. C., & Holz, A. A. (2007). A GIS-based approach to watershed classification for Nebraska reservoirs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(3), 605–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. E. (1977). A trophic state index for lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 22(2), 361–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman, W. B. (1990). Classification of Texas reservoirs in relation to limnology and fish community associations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 119(3), 511–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A., Li, J., Antoniou, G., Kendall, D., Kling, C., Herriges, J., Castro, R., Van Meter, P., Woolnough, D., Egan, K., Jeon, Y., Andrews, R., Conrad, S., & Boatwright, L. (2005). Iowa lakes classification for restoration. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinho, F. N., Ferreira, M. T., & Portugal e Castro, M. I. (1998). Fish assemblage composition in relation to environmental gradients in Portuguese reservoirs. Aquatic Living Resources, 11(5), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27(4), 857–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ground, T. A., & Groeger, A. W. (1994). Chemical classification and trophic characteristics of Texas reservoirs. Lake and Reservoir Management, 10(2), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. R. (1986). Classification of Iowa lakes and their fish standing stock. Lake and Reservoir Management, 2(1), 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. M. (1970). The influence of engineering design and operation and other environmental factors on reservoir fisheries resources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 6(1), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. R., Knowlton, M. F., & Obrecht, D. V. (2004). Importance of landscape variables and morphology on nutrients in Missouri reservoirs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61(8), 1503–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. R., Perkins, B. D., Obrecht, D. V., Knowlton, M. F., Thorpe, A. P., Watanabe, S., & Bacon, R. R. (2008). Nutrients, seston and transparency of Missouri reservoirs and oxbow lakes: an analysis of regional limnology. Lake and Reservoir Management, 24(2), 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. R., Peck, D. V., Paulsen, S. G., Seeliger, C. W., Hughes, R. M., Whittier, T. R., & Kamman, N. C. (2014). Lakeshore and littoral physical habitat structure in a national lakes assessment. Lake and Reservoir Management, 30(2), 192–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, B. L., & Groeger, A. W. (1986). Limnological and ecological changes associated with reservoir aging. In G. E. Hall & M. J. Van Den Avyle (Eds.), Reservoir fisheries management: strategies for the 80’s (pp. 103–109). Bethesda: Southern Division Reservoir Committee, American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, W., & Beretvas, S. N. (2010). The performance of multiple imputation for Likert-type items with missing data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9(1), 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, L. E. (1999). A typology of fisheries in large reservoirs of the United States. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 19(2), 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, L. E. (2008). Extending the scale of reservoir management. In M. S. Allen, S. Sammons, & M. J. Maceina (Eds.), Balancing Fisheries Management and Water Uses for Impounded River Systems (pp. 75–102). Symposium 62. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society.

  • Miranda, L. E., & Hunt, K. M. (2011). An index of reservoir habitat impairment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 172(1–4), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. (1987). Ecoregions of the continental United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(1), 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. (1995). Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In W. Davis & T. P. Simon (Eds.), Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making (pp. 49–62). Boca Raton: Lewis Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, K., & Green, R. (2011). A national reservoir database of geographical, physical, and morphological metrics for classification and discrimination for fisheries habitat assessment. U.S. Geological Survey. Available from the Reservoir Fisheries Habitat Partnership upon request.

  • Romesburg, H. C. (2004). Cluster analysis for researchers. North Carolina: Lulu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupp, D. H. (1992). An ecological classification of Minnesota lakes with associated fish communities. St. Paul: Investigational Report 417, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaber, P. R., Kapinos, F. P., & Knapp, G. L. (1987). Hydrologic unit maps: U.S. geological survey, water-supply paper 2294. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoup, D. E., Callahan, S. P., Wahl, D. H., & Pierce, C. L. (2007). Size-specific growth of bluegill, largemouth bass and channel catfish in relation to prey availability and limnological variables. Journal of Fish Biology, 70(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S., Luong-Van, J., & Boland, K. (1996). Retention time as a primary determinant of colour and light attenuation in two tropical Australian reservoirs. Freshwater Biology, 36(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (2009). National Inventory of Dams (NID). Available: http://geo.usace.army.mil/pgis/f?p = 397:1:3514628094309333. (December 2010).

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2006). Wadeable streams assessment: a collaborative survey of the nation’s streams. Report 841-B-06-002. Washington: Office of Research and Development, Office of Water, USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS. (2011). National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). (2010). LCC information bulletin #2: developing the National Geographic Framework. Office of the Science Advisor, USFWS. 18 pages.

  • Vanni, M. J., Arend, K. K., Bremigan, M. T., Bunnell, D. B., Garvey, J. E., González, M. J., Renwick, W. H., Soranno, P. A., & Stein, R. A. (2005). Linking landscapes and food webs: effects of omnivorous fish and watersheds on reservoir ecosystems. BioScience, 55(2), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten, G., Poesen, J., de Vente, J., & Koninckx, X. (2003). Sediment yield variability in Spain: a quantitative and semiqualitative analysis using reservoir sedimentation rates. Geomorphology, 50(4), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. (1990). Reservoir ecosystems: conclusions and speculations. In K. W. Thornton, B. L. Kimmel, & F. E. Payne (Eds.), Reservoir limnology: ecological perspectives (pp. 227–238). New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiken, E., Jiménez Nava, F., & Griffith, G. (2011). North American terrestrial ecoregions—Level III (p. 149). Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Reservoir Fish Habitat Partnership, the USGS Mississippi Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, the Mississippi State University Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, and the USFWS Student Career Experience Program for their support of this project. We also thank J. Boxrucker and Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Fisheries Division biologists for their helpful assistance with the pilot survey, as well as the many reservoir managers nationwide who provided data for this study. K. Hunt and J. Boxrucker provided useful comments that improved previous versions of this manuscript, and four anonymous reviewers provided helpful revisions and comments. The use of trade names or products does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca M. Krogman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Material 1

(PDF 91 kb)

Supplemental Material 2

(PDF 512 kb)

Supplemental Material 3

(PDF 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krogman, R.M., Miranda, L.E. A classification system for large reservoirs of the contiguous United States. Environ Monit Assess 187, 174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4244-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4244-1

Keywords

Navigation