Skip to main content
Log in

Removal of phenols and other pollutants from different landfill leachates using powdered activated carbon supplemented SBR technology

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, two types of sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) with 8 h of cycle times, namely non-powdered activated carbon (NPAC-SBR) and powdered activated carbon (PAC-SBR), were used for the treatment of raw leachates at Kulim and Pulau Burung landfill sites. To test the performance of SBRs, phenols, total iron, zinc, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, color, suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand, biochemical oxygen demand, and total dissolved salts removal efficiencies and sludge volume index (SVI) were studied at both sites. The rates of phenols removal, for instance in NPAC-SBRs and PAC-SBRs at Kulim, were 25% and 55%, respectively, whereas those at Pulau Buring were 94.81% and 97.75%, respectively. PAC as adsorbent in PAC-SBRs enhanced the removal efficiencies of the aforementioned pollutants from leachates at both sites. In addition, PAC as adsorbent decreased the SVI values at Kulim (59.7 mL/g) and Pulau Burung (91.4 mL/g) leachates and improved the nitrification and denitrification processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghamohammadi, N., Aziz, H. A., Isa, M. H., & Zinatizadeh, A. A. (2007). Powdered activated carbon augmented activated sludge process for treatment of semi-aerobic landfill leachate using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technology, 98, 3570–3578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S., Congeevaram, S., Choung, Y., & Park, J. (2008). Enhanced phenol removal by floating fungal populations in a high concentration phenol-fed membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 221, 494–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aktas, O., & Cecen, F. (2001). Addition of activated carbon to batch activated sludge reactors in the treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 76, 793–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azimi, S. H. H., Bidhendi, G. N., & Mahmoodkhani, R. (2005). Aeration ratio effect on efficiency of organic materials removal in sequencing batch reactors. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 8, 20–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, S. Q., Aziz, H. A., Yusoff, M. S., Bashir, M. J. K., & Umar, M. (2010). Leachate characterization in semi-aerobic and anaerobic sanitary landfills: a comparative study. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 2608–2614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, H. A., Ling, T. J., Haque, A. A. M., Umar, M., & Adlan, M. N. (2011a). Leachate treatment by swim-bed bio fringe technology. Desalination. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.063.

  • Aziz, S. Q., Aziz, H. A., & Yusoff, M. S. (2011b). Powdered activated carbon augmented double react-settle sequencing batch reactor process for treatment of landfill leachate. Desalination, 277, 313–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, S. Q., Aziz, H. A., Yusoff, M. S., & Bashir, M. J. K. (2011c). Landfill leachate treatment using powdered activated carbon augmented sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process: optimization by response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 404–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. J. K., Aziz, H. A., Yusoff, M. S., Aziz, S. Q., & Mohajeri, S. (2010). Stabilized sanitary landfill leachate treatment using anionic resin: treatment optimization by response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, 115–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. H., & Lim, P. E. (2007). Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor performance with aerated and unaerated FILL periods in treating phenol-containing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 98, 1333–1338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Quality (2009). Control of pollution from solid waste transfer station and landfill, Regulations 2009, under the Laws of Malaysia—Malaysia Environmental Quality Act 1974.

  • Foo, K. Y., & Hameed, B. H. (2009). An overview of landfill leachate treatment via activated carbon adsorption process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 171, 54–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorfelt, K. (2008). Nitrification and denitrification of leachate with SBR in pilot scale at Spillepeng waste deposition site. Sweden: Water and Environmental Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J. S., Abbas, A. A., Chen, Y. P., Liu, Z. P., & Chen, P. (2010). Treatment of landfill leachate using a combined stripping, Fenton, SBR, and coagulation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178, 699–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. K., & Singh, G. (2007). Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135(1–3), 107–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janczukowicz, W., Szewczyk, M., Krzemieniewski, M., & Pesta, J. (2001). Settling properties of activated sludge from a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 10, 15–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klimiuk, E., & Kulikowska, D. (2006). The influence of hydraulic retention time and sludge age on the kinetics of nitrogen removal from leachate in SBR. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 15, 283–289.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kujawski, W., Warszawsk, A., Ratajczak, W., Porebski, T., Capata, W., & Ostrowska, I. (2004). Removal of phenol from wastewater by different separation techniques. Desalination, 163, 287–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurata, Y., Ono, Y., & Ono, Y. (2008). Occurrence of phenols in leachates from municipal solid waste landfill sites in Japan. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 10, 144–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. P., Healy, M. G., Zhan, X. M., Norton, D., & Rodgers, M. (2008). Effect of aeration rate on nutrient removal from slaughterhouse wastewater in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 192, 251–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, P. E., Lim, S. P., Seng, C. E., & Noor, A. M. (2010). Treatment of landfill leachate in sequencing batch reactor supplemented with activated rice husk as adsorbent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 159, 123–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, J.-C., & Huang, Y.-J. (2011). Assessing the performance of wastewater treatment with the combination of Fenton and ferrite process. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51(1–4), 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (2003). Wastewater engineering-treatment and reuse. 4th edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Mohajeri, S., Aziz, H. A., Isa, M. H., Zahed, M. A., Mohajeri, L., Bashir, M. J. K., et al. (2011). Multiple responses analysis and modeling of Fenton process for treatment of high strength landfill leachate. Water Science and Technology, 64, 1652–1660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renou, S., Givaudan, G. J., Poulain, S., Dirassouyan, F., & Moulin, P. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150, 468–493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spagni, A., & Marsili-Libelli, S. (2009). Nitrogen removal via nitrite in a sequencing batch reactor treating sanitary landfill leachate. Bioresource Technology, 100, 609–614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surampalli, R. Y., Tyagi, R. D. O., Scheible, O. K., & Heidman, J. A. (1997). Nitrification de nitrification and phosphorus removal in sequential batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, 61, 151–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turovskiy, I. S., & Mathai, P. K. (2006).Wastewater sludge processing. Wiley-Interscience, A John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Publication.

  • Tziotzios, G., Economou, C. N., Lyberatos, G., & Vayenas, D. V. (2007). Effect of the specific surface area and operating mode on biological phenol removal using packed bed reactors. Desalination, 211, 28–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uygur, A., & Kargi, F. (2004). Biological nutrient removal from pre-treated landfill leachate in a sequencing batch reactor. Journal of Environmental Management, 71, 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Peng, Y., & Stephenson, T. (2009). Effect of influent nutrient ratios and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a two-sludge sequencing batch reactor process. Bioresource Technology, 100, 3506–3512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, M., Zhou, J., Tan, Y., Zhang, A., Xia, Y., & Ji, L. (2006). Treatment of highly concentrated phenol wastewater with an extractive membrane reactor using silicone rubber. Desalination, 195, 281–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zouboulisa, A. I., Chai, X.-L., & Katsoyiannis, I. A. (2004). The application of bioflocculant for the removal of humic acids from stabilized landfill leachates. Environmental Management, 70, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for providing the grant of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidi Abdul Aziz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aziz, S.Q., Aziz, H.A., Yusoff, M.S. et al. Removal of phenols and other pollutants from different landfill leachates using powdered activated carbon supplemented SBR technology. Environ Monit Assess 184, 6147–6158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2409-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2409-8

Keywords

Navigation