Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive cluster sampling with clusters selected without replacement and stopping rule

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) has received much attention in recent years since it yields more precise estimates than conventional sampling designs when applied to rare and clustered populations. These results, however, are impacted by the availability of some prior knowledge about the spatial distribution and the absolute abundance of the population under study. This prior information helps the researcher to select a suitable critical value that triggers the adaptive search, the neighborhood definition and the initial sample size. A bad setting of the ACS design would worsen the performance of the adaptive estimators. In particular, one of the greatest weaknesses in ACS is the inability to control the final sampling effort if, for example, the critical value is set too low. To overcome this drawback one can introduce ACS with clusters selected without replacement where one can fix in advance the number of distinct clusters to be selected or ACS with a stopping rule which stops the adaptive sampling when a predetermined sample size limit is reached or when a given stopping rule is verified. However, the stopping rule breaks down the theoretical basis for the unbiasedness of the ACS estimators introducing an unknown amount of bias in the estimates. The current study improves the performance of ACS when applied to patchy and clustered but not rare populations and/or less clustered populations. This is done by combining the stopping rule with ACS without replacement of clusters so as to further limit the sampling effort in form of traveling expenses by avoiding repeat observations and by reducing the final sample size. The performance of the proposed design is investigated using simulated and real data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown J, Manly B (1998) Restricted adaptive cluster sampling. Environ Ecol Stat 5:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman M (1997) Efficiency of some sampling designs for spatially clustered populations. Environmetrics 8:145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman M, Lan F (2001) Inverse adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrics 57:1096–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Battista T (2002) Diversity index estimation by adaptive sampling. Environmetrics 13:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Battista T (2003) Resampling methods for estimating dispersion indices in random and adaptive designs. Environ Ecol Stat 10:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle P (1983) Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryver A, Thompson S (2007) Adaptive sampling without replacement of clusters. Stat Methodol 4:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryver AL, Urairat N, Smith D (2012) Partial systematic adaptive cluster sampling. Environmetrics 23:306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattone SA, Di Battista T (2011) Adaptive cluster sampling with a data driven stopping rule. Stat Methods Appl 20:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattone SA, Mohamed E, Mwangi JW (2013) Application of adaptive cluster sampling with a data-driven stopping rule to plant disease incidence. J Phytopathol 161:632–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd M (1967) Mean crowding. J Anim Ecol 36:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M, Seber G (1997) Adaptive cluster sampling with networks selected without replacement. Biometrika 84:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M, Seber G (2002) Unbiased estimators for restricted adaptive cluster sampling. New Wealand J Stat 44:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Z, Quinn TI (2003) Estimator bias and efficiency for adaptive cluster with order statistics and a stopping rule. Environ Ecol Stat 10:17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson S (1990) Adaptive cluster sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 85:1050–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson S (1991a) Adaptive cluster sampling: designs with primary and secondary units. Biometrics 47:1103–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson S (1991b) Stratified adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrics 78:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson S (1996) Adaptive cluster sampling based on order statistics. Environmetrics 7:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Jiao Y, Su Z, Reid K (2012) Performance comparison of traditional sampling designs and adaptive sampling designs for fishery-independent surveys: a simulation study. Fish Res 113:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research by the second author is funded by the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI, Kenya), the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) and the Rhineland-Palatinate research initiative via the Trier Centre of Sustainable Systems (TriCSS). Finally, the authors thank the editors and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments that have further improved the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Antonio Gattone.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Bryan F. J. Manly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gattone, S.A., Mohamed, E. & Di Battista, T. Adaptive cluster sampling with clusters selected without replacement and stopping rule. Environ Ecol Stat 23, 453–468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-016-0348-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-016-0348-9

Keywords

Navigation