Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Positioning in mathematics education: revelations on an imported theory

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop theory within the field of mathematics education based on analysis of an imported theory—positioning theory—and the way it is used in the field. After summarizing positioning theory, we identify some conceptual fuzziness, particularly in core terms “positioning” and “storyline.” We offer Lemke’s idea of timescales as a way to refine the theory. We then use the refined theory to analyze strong examples from mathematics education literature as a source of insight into how this theory is being and could be used in the field. We identify the need to be clear about scale in describing positioning and storyline, to recognize that multiple storylines and positionings are at play in any interaction, to be specific about the role of communication acts in development of positioning and storyline, and to differentiate among different kinds of positioning. We claim that attention to these issues will help researchers recognize narratives and relationships at play that may be outside their expectation and also underpin stronger warranted claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To get a sense of the range of this kind of work, see, for example, Engle and Conant (2002), Enyedy et al. (2008), Gresalfi and Cobb (2006), Herbel-Eisenmann et al. (2010), Ju and Kwon (2007), Mesa and Chang (2010), Turner et al. (2013), and Wood (2013).

  2. We include a recent article that was co-authored by two of us because revisiting our own work provides an example of the value of continuous reworking of our theoretical frames.

  3. Because some of our references are authored by a subset of the people who co-authored this article, we use “we” to refer to all of the current authors and cite our earlier work with the relevant author names.

  4. Here “reform” referred to the use of the ideas from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards documents (e.g., NCTM (1989), 1991, 2000) in the USA.

  5. It was not until recently in positioning theory that identity was discussed in depth (Moghaddam et al. 2008); however, mathematics education researchers often use positioning theory as a way to address identity. The definition of identity, the scale of identity being described, and the relationship between identity and positioning theory are typically not articulated in research. Identities might be viewed as the “positions assumed by people in their interactions with others both in moment-to-moment interaction and as accumulated over time” (Johnson, 2013, p. 22). That is, some authors conceptualize identities as related to specific contexts and others conceptualize identities as related to how positions come to “stick” (Anderson, 2009, p. 291) with people. As a result, identities might be conceptualized at a variety of scales.

References

  • Anderson, K. T. (2009). Applying positioning theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing. Linguistics and Education, 20(4), 291–310. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2009.08.001.

  • Banks, C. A. M., & Banks, J. A. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 152–158.

  • Barton, A. C., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2012). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75. doi:10.3102/0002831212458142.

  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–52). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

  • de Freitas, E. (2008). Splitting teacher identity: The disjunction between personal narrative and procedural discourse in the mathematics classroom. In T. Brown (Ed.), The psychology of mathematics education: A psychoanalytic displacement (pp. 139–155). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.

  • de Freitas, E. (2012). The diagram as story: Unfolding the event-structure of the mathematical diagram. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 27–33.

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1.

  • Enyedy, N., Rubel, L., Castellon, V., Mukhopadhyay, S., Esmonde, I., & Secada, W. (2008). Revoicing in a multilingual classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 134–162. doi:10.1080/10986060701854458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., Mendick, H., & Moreau, M.-P. (2010). Imagining the mathematician: Young people talking about popular representations of maths. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 45–60. doi:10.1080/01596300903465419.

  • Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284. doi:10.1080/10508400902797958.

  • Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.

  • Foote, M. Q., & Bartell, T. G. (2011). Pathways to equity in mathematics education: How life experiences impact researcher positionality. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78, 45–68.

  • Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies, 1(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 191–206). NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Introduction: The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts (pp. 1–11). Westport, CT: Praeger.

  • Harré, R., & Slocum, N. (2003). Disputes as complex social events. Common Knowledge, 9(1), 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999a). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999b). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 1–13). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 43–63. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9240-y.

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2010). Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: The significance of stance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 23–42. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9253-6.

  • Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. (1997a). The math wars: California battles it out over mathematics education reform, part I. Notices of the AMS, 44(6), 695–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. (1997b). The math wars: California battles it out over mathematics education reform, part II. Notices of the AMS, 44(7), 817–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R. (2013). Illuminating the identities of mathematics teachers and mathematics teacher educators. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3592117).

  • Ju, M.-K., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). Ways of talking and ways of positioning: Students’ beliefs in an inquiry-oriented differential equations class. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 267–280. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.002.

  • Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 169–191.

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

  • Mesa, V., & Chang, P. (2010). The language of engagement in two highly interactive undergraduate mathematics classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 21(2), 83–100. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2010.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (1999). Reflexive positioning: Culture and private discourse. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 74–86). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Moghaddam, F. M., Harré, R., & Lee. (2008). Positioning and conflict: An introduction. In F. M. Moghaddam, R. Harré, & N. Lee (Eds.), Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis (pp. 3–20). New York: Springer.

  • Moghaddam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., & Wright, S. C. (1993). Social psychology in cultural perspective. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. (2012). Studying discourse implies studying equity. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies (pp. 181–192). New York: Springer.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, A. N. (2010). Metaphors of hierarchy in mathematics education discourse: The narrow path. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(1), 79–97.

  • Richardson Bruna, K., & Vann, R. (2007). On pigs and packers: Radically contextualizing a practice of science with Mexican immigrant students. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(1), 19–59. doi:10.1007/s11422-006-9041-x.

  • Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, H., Theakston-Musselman, A., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Steele, M. D. (2013). Teacher positioning and agency to act: Talking about “low-level” students. In A. Superfine & M. Martinez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.

  • Turner, E., Domínguez, H., Maldonado, L., & Empson, S. (2013). English learners’ participation in mathematical discussion: Shifting positionings and dynamic identities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 199–234.

  • van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9178-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (2013). Mathematical micro-identities: moment-to-moment positioning and learning in a fourth-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 775–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamakawa, Y., Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2009). Role of positioning: the role of positioning in constructing an identity in a third grade mathematics classroom. In K. Kumpulainen, K. Hmelo-Silver, & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: methodologies in action (pp. 179–202). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. #0918117, Herbel-Eisenmann, PI; Cirillo and Steele, co-PIs). Opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. We would like to thank David Pimm, Anna Sfard, and two anonymous reviewers for their insights and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth A. Herbel-Eisenmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herbel-Eisenmann, B.A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K.R. et al. Positioning in mathematics education: revelations on an imported theory. Educ Stud Math 89, 185–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5

Keywords

Navigation