Abstract
This study examined 361 Chinese and 345 Singaporean sixth-grade students’ performance and problem-solving strategies for solving 14 problems about speed. By focusing on students from two distinct high-performing countries in East Asia, we provide a useful perspective on the differences that exist in the preparation and problem-solving strategies of these groups of students. The strategy analysis indicates that the Chinese sample used algebraic strategies more frequently and more successfully than the Singaporean sample, although the Chinese sample used a limited variety of strategies. The Singaporean sample’s use of model-drawing produced a performance advantage on one problem by converting multiplication/division of fractions into multiplication/division of whole numbers. Several suggestions regarding teaching and learning of mathematical problem solving, algebra, and problems about speed and its related concepts of ratio and proportion are made.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We use the terms heuristic and strategy interchangeably in this study to denote the methods or problem solving procedures that direct the search for a solution.
References
Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem-solving tool: Continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115–136). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bell, A., Fischbein, E., & Greer, B. (1984). Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 129–147.
Bond, M. H. (Ed.). (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Boulter, D. R., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Identification of strategies used in solving transformational geometry problems. Journal of Educational Research, 87(5), 298–303.
Bowers, J. S., & Nickerson, S. N. (2000). Students’ changing views of rates and graphs when working with a simulation microworld. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 22(3–4), 10–25.
Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Australia: Pearson Education Australia Pty Limited
Cai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph Series No. 7). NCTM.
Cai, J. (2000a). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 309–340.
Cai, J. (2000b). Understanding and representing the arithmetic averaging algorithm: An analysis and comparison of U.S. and Chinese students’ responses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 839–855.
Cai, J. (2001). Improving mathematics learning: Lessons from cross-national studies of U.S. and Chinese students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 400–405.
Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Exploring the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 135–167.
Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 459–475.
Cai, J., & Sun, W. (2002). Developing students’ proportional reasoning: A Chinese perspective. In B. H. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios and proportions (pp. 195–205). NCTM 2002 Yearbook. Reston: NCTM.
Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2014). Problem posing research in mathematics: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice. New York: Springer.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2001). National mathematics curriculum standards at the compulsory education level (draft for consultation) [in Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2011). Mathematics curriculum standard of compulsory education (2011 version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
English, L. D. (1993). Children's strategies in solving two- and three-dimensional combinatorial problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 255–273.
Fan, L., Wong, N. Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.). (2004). How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore: World Scientific.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61–75.
Floden, R. E. (2002). The measurement of opportunity to learn. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 231–266). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Fong, H. K. (1994). Bridging the gap between secondary and primary mathematics. Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 73–84.
Fong, H. K. (1998). Solving challenging mathematical problems: The heuristic approach for primary schools. Singapore: Kingsford Educational Services.
Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276–295). New York: Macmillan.
Jiang, C. (2005). Strategies and errors in solving speed problems: A comparative study between Chinese and Singapore students. Singapore: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
Jiang, C. (2013). Errors in solving word problems about speed: A case in Singapore and Mainland China. New Waves - Educational Research & Development, 16(1), 56–75.
Jiang, C., & Chua, B. L. (2010). Strategies for solving three fraction-related problems about speed: A comparative study between Chinese and Singapore students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 73–96.
Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), Eighth International Conference on Mathematics Education. Selected Lectures (pp. 271–290). Seville: S.A.E.M. Thales.
Kilpatrick, J. (1967). Analyzing the solution of word problems in mathematics, an exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Lamon, S. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–669). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Lester, F. K. (1985). Methodological considerations in research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 41–69). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
Ma, Z., Wang, H., Sun, H., & Wang, Y. (1991). A brief history of mathematics education [in Chinese]. Nanning: Guangxi Educational Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1981). Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra problems into families, categories, and templates. Instructional Science, 10(2), 135–175.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (Singapore). (1990). Mathematics syllabus: Primary 1 to 3, Primary 4 to 6 (Normal Course), Primary 4 to 8 (Extended Course). Singapore: Ministry of Education: Curriculum Planning Division.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (Singapore). (2000a). Primary Mathematics 6A (3rd ed.). Singapore: Ministry of Education: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (Singapore). (2000b). Primary Mathematics 6B (3rd ed.). Singapore: Ministry of Education: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (Singapore). (2006). Mathematics syllabus: Primary. Singapore: Ministry of Education: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (Singapore). (2012). Primary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Ministry of Education: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Olson, J. F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., et al. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Ng, L. E. (2002). Representation of problem solving in Singaporean primary mathematics textbooks with respect to types, Polya’s model and heuristics. Singapore: Unpublished master’s thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
Ng, S. F. (2004). Developing algebraic thinking in early grades: Case study of the Singapore primary mathematics curriculum. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 39–59.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (volume I). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en.
People’s Education Press. (2002). Compulsory education curriculum standard experimental textbook mathematics: 3A [义务教育课程标准实验教科书数学三年级上册]. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
Robitaille, D. F., & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies in achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics and teaching (pp. 687–709). New York: Macmillan.
Siu, M. K. (2004). Official curriculum in mathematics in ancient China: How did candidates study for the examination? In J. Cai, L. Fan, S. Li, & N. Y. Wong (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 157–185). Singapore: World Scientific.
Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (2000). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 149–167.
Stanic, G. M. A., & Kilpatrick, J. (1988). Historical perspectives on problem solving in mathematics curriculum. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 1–22). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Teh, K. L., & Looi, C. K. (2002). New syllabus D mathematics 1 (5th ed.). Singapore: Shing Lee Publishers Pte Ltd.
Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics I: Analysis of mathematics curriculum. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Wong, K. Y., Lee, P. Y., Kaur, B., Foong, P. Y., & Ng, S. F. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics education: The Singapore journey. Singapore: World Scientific.
Wong, N. Y. (2004). The CHC learner’s phenomenon: Its implications on mathematics education. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 503–534). Singapore: World Scientific.
Yeap, B., Ferrucci, B. J., & Carter, J. A. (2006). Comparative study of arithmetic problems in Singaporean and American mathematics textbook. In F. K. S. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West. The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 213–226). New York: Springer.
Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by a Multi-Year Research Grant from the University of Macau. Any opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the university.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Test problems
-
1.
A man drove at 72 km/h for 2 h, then the distance he travelled was ________km.
-
2.
It takes a motorist __________ hours to travel 136 km at a speed of 68 km/h.
-
3.
Judy cycled 45 km in 3 h, then her speed was __________km/h.
-
4.
A man went to visit his friend who lived 27 km away. After walking at a speed of 6 km/h for \( 1\frac{1}{2} \) hours, he finished the remaining journey at a jogging speed of 12 km/h and got to his friend’s house at the appointed time. Find his average speed for the whole journey.
-
5.
Mike made a journey from City P to City Q. In the first hour, he covered \( \frac{1}{3} \) of it. In the second hour, he covered \( \frac{1}{5} \) of the whole journey. Finally, he took 2 h to finish the remaining journey at a speed of 42 km/h. Calculate his average speed for the whole journey.
-
6.
Town A and Town B are 20 km apart. Mike left Town A at 8.00 am and cycled at 16 km/h towards Town B. 10 min after Mike started, Bill cycled from Town B towards Town A at 15 km/h.
-
(a)
At 8.30 am, how far was Mike away from Town A and how far was Bill away from Town B?
-
(b)
Did they meet up at 8.30 am? If not, how far were they apart from each other at 8.30 am?
-
7.
Mike made a journey from City P to City Q. In the first half an hour, he covered \( \frac{1}{7} \) of it. In the second half an hour, he covered \( \frac{1}{3} \) of the remaining journey. Finally, he took another half an hour to finish the journey at a speed of 72 km/h. Calculate his average speed for the whole journey.
-
8.
Yesterday afternoon, Mike drove to the kindergarten to take back his son. It was raining on the way to the kindergarten, so he had to drive at a slow speed of 39 km/h, and it took him \( 1\frac{1}{3} \) hours to get there. He returned soon at a faster speed along the same way. When he came back home, his wife told him that his average speed for the round trip is 52 km/h (Ignoring time spent in the kindergarten). Find his speed on the way back.
-
9.
On Sunday, Judy went to see her grandma who lives 150 km away. After cycling at an average speed of 15 km/h for a few hours, she got tired and took a lift from a passing truck. The truck’s average travelling speed is 75 km/h. When she got to her grandma's house, she checked the time and knew that the trip took her 6 h. Find the time she cycled.
-
10.
Two places R and S are 300 km apart. Mike left R and drove at 84 km/h towards S. At the same time, Bill left S at 60 km/h and drove towards R. How long did they take to meet?
-
11.
Two motorists, Jack and John, are having a race in the athletic track. John starts first. Half an hour later, Jack begins to chase after him. John’s driving speed is 84 km/h, and Jack’s driving speed is 90 km/h. How long does Jack take to catch up with John?
-
12.
On Sunday, the students of one class went out for a picnic. At first they travelled in the crowded city 40 min at a speed of 27 km/h. Then they covered \( \frac{1}{5} \) of the remaining journey at a speed of 54 km/h. Finally, they travelled \( \frac{2}{3} \) of the whole journey in one hour on the expressway. Calculate the average speed for the whole journey.
-
13.
Sunday morning, Rebecca and her parents went out to enjoy the natural scenery. On the way to the destination, they travelled at a slow speed of 40 km/h. On the way back, they drove at a faster speed of 120 km/h. When they came back home, they found that they had been out for 2 h. Find the average speed for this round trip (ignore time at the destination).
-
14.
On the first day of this new term, Teacher Lee went to the bookshop to take back the ordered textbooks. On the way to the bookshop, his speed was as slow as 24 km/h because of the heavy traffic. On the way back, the traffic was light so that he took only one hour. If the average speed for the round trip was 36 km/h, find the speed on the way back (ignore time spent in the bookshop).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, C., Hwang, S. & Cai, J. Chinese and Singaporean sixth-grade students’ strategies for solving problems about speed. Educ Stud Math 87, 27–50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9559-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9559-x