Antonini, S., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Indirect Proof: What is specific to this way of proving?

*ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40*, 401–412.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarBailey, D. H., & Borwein, J. M. (2005). Experimental mathematics: Examples, methods, and implications.

*Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52*(5), 502–514.

Google ScholarBalacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. (Translated by David Pimm). In D. Pimm (Ed.), *Mathematics, Teachers, and Children* (pp. 216–235). London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Balacheff, N. (1991). The benefits and limits of social interaction: The case of mathematical proof. In A. Bishop, S. Mellin-Olsen, & J. van Dormolen (Eds.),

*Mathematical knowledge: Its growth through teaching*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Google ScholarBall, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). *The teaching of proof.* Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematicians, Beijing, China. Volume III, 1–3, 907–920.

Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F., & Pedemont, B. (2010). Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation. In M. M. F. Pinot & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.),

*Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 1, pp. 179–204). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.

Google ScholarBourdieu, P. (1990).

*The logic of practice*. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Google ScholarBourdieu, P. (1998). *Practical reason*. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Brousseau, G. (1997).

*Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques 1970–1990*. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Google ScholarBrown, S. (2003). *The evolution of students understanding of mathematical induction: A teaching experiment*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego and San Diego State University, CA.

Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justifications for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24*, 359–387.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarCoe, R., & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students.

*British Educational Research Journal, 20*, 41–53.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarDavis, P. J. (1981). Are there coincidences in mathematics?

*The American Mathematical Monthly, 88*, 311–320.

Google Scholarde Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics.

*Pythagoras, 24*, 17–24.

Google ScholarDewey, J. (1910). *How we think*. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.

Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof.

*For the Learning of Mathematics, 3*(2), 9–18, 24.

Google ScholarGoetting, M. (1995). *The college students’ understanding of mathematical proof*. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College Park: University of Maryland.

Haimo, D. T. (1995). Experimentation and conjecture are not enough.

*The American Mathematical Monthly, 102*(2), 102–112.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarHanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof.

*Interchange, 21*(1), 6–13.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarHanna, G. (1995). Challenges to the importance of proof.

*For the Learning of Mathematics, 15*(3), 42–49.

Google ScholarHanna, G., & Barbeau, E. (2008). Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge.

*ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40*, 345–353.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarHarel, G. (1998). Two dual assertions: The first on learning and the second on teaching (or Vice Versa).

*American Mathematical Monthly, 105*(6), 497–507.

Google ScholarHarel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S.R. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), *Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction*. Monograph Series of the Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2, 185–212.

Harel, G., & Brown, S. (2008). Mathematical induction: Cognitive and instructional considerations. In M. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.),

*Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics* (pp. 111–123). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarHarel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), *Research on collegiate mathematics education* (pp. 234–283). Providence, RI, USA: American Mathematical Society.

Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*, 396–428.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarHerbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2011). Research on practical rationality: studying the justification of actions in mathematics teaching.

*The Mathematics Enthusiast*,

*8*(3), 405–462.

Google ScholarHoyles, C. (1997). The curricular shaping of students’ approaches to proof.

*For the Learning of Mathematics, 17*(1), 7–16.

Google ScholarIannone, P., & Inglis, M. (2010). Self efficacy and mathematical proof: Are undergraduate students good at assessing their own proof production ability? In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Keene, & K. Marrongelle (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education*, 2010, Raliegh, North Carolina.

Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2009). The effect of authority on the persuasiveness of mathematical arguments.

*Cognition and Instruction, 27*(1), 25–50.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarJahnke, H. N. (2005). *A genetic approach to proof*. Paper present at CERME4, Sant Feliu de Guixols, Spain, 17–21 February 2005

Jahnke, H. N. (2007). Proofs and hypothesis.

*ZDM Mathematics Education, 39*, 79–86.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarKirshner, D. (2004). Enculturation: The neglected learning metaphor in mathematics education. In D. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.),

*Proceedings of the 26*
^{th}
*Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 2, pp. 765–772). Toronto, Canada: PME.

Google ScholarKnuth, E. J. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics.

*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5*, 61–88.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarKnuth, E., Choppin, J., & Bieda, K. (2009). Middle school students’ productions of mathematical justification. In M. Blanton, D. Stylianou, & E. Knuth (Eds.), *Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective* (pp. 153–212). New York: Routledge.

Maher, C. (2009). Children's reasoning: Discovering the idea of mathematical proof. In M. Blanton, D. Stylianou, & E. Knuth (Eds.), *Teaching and learning proof across the K-16 curriculum* (pp. 120–132). New York, NY: Taylor Francis–Routledge.

Mariotti, M. A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), *Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present, and future* (pp. 173–204). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Martin, G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12*, 41–51.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, J. (1985).

*Thinking mathematically*. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.

Google ScholarMason, J. (1999). *Learning and doing mathematics* (2^{nd} revised edition). York, UK: QED.

Mason, J. (2006). What makes an example exemplary: Pedagogical and didactical issues in appreciating multiplicative structures. In R. Zazkis & S. R. Campbell (Eds.), *Number theory in mathematics education: Perspectives and prospects* (pp. 41–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

Menary, R. (2003). Peirce and Wittgenstein on doubt: A comparison. In W. Löffler & P. Weingartner (Eds.), *Contributions of the ALWS, Volume XI,* pp. 230–232.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000).

*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.

Google ScholarOrton, A., & Orton, J. (1999). Pattern and the approach to algebra. In A. Orton (Ed.),

*Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics* (pp. 104–120). London: Cassell.

Google ScholarPolya, G. (1957). *How to solve it* (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Recio, A. M., & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of mathematics proof.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48*, 83–99.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarSegal, J. (2000). Learning about mathematical proof: Conviction and validity.

*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18*, 191–210.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarSimon, M., & Blume, G. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers.

*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15*, 3–31.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarStylianides, A. (2007). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65*, 1–20.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarStylianides, A., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving.

*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11*, 307–332.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarStylianides, A., & Stylianides, G. (2009a). Proof construction and evaluation.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72*, 237–253.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarStylianides, G., & Stylianides, A. (2009b). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40*(3), 314–352.

Google ScholarTanguay, D., & Grenier, D. (2010). Experimentation and proof in a solid geometry situation.

*For the Learning of Mathematics, 30*(3), 36–42.

Google ScholarVinner, S. (1997). The pseudo-conceptual and pseudo-analytic thought processes in mathematical learning.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34*, 97–129.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarWaring, S., Orton, A., & Roper, T. (1999). Pattern and proof. In A. Orton (Ed.), *Pattern in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics* (pp. 104–120). London, Cassell.

Weber, K. (2009). Mathematics majors’ evaluation of mathematical arguments and their conception of proof. *Electronic Proceedings for the 12*
^{th}
*Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education*: Raleigh, NC.

Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof.

*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12*, 306–336.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarWeber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2012). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory qualitative study with a confirmatory quantitative study. In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2012* (pp. 495–10). Portland, Oregon.

Wittgenstein, L. (1969).

*On certainty*. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.

Google ScholarYackel, E., & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.),

*A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics* (pp. 227–236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google ScholarZaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60*, 297–321.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarZazkis, R., & Chernoff, E. (2008). What makes a counterexample exemplary?

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68*, 195–208.

CrossRefGoogle ScholarZazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Chernoff, E. (2008). The role of examples in forming and refuting generalizations.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68*, 131–141.

CrossRefGoogle Scholar