Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student errors: ratio and proportion in similar rectangles

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpreting and responding to student thinking are central tasks of reform-minded mathematics teaching. This study examined preservice teachers’ (PSTs) interpretations of and responses to a student’s error(s) involving finding a missing length in similar rectangles through a teaching scenario task. Fifty-seven PSTs’ responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Analysis results revealed that although the student’s errors came from conceptual aspects of similarity, a majority of PSTs identified the errors as stemming from procedural aspects of similarity, subsequently guiding them by invoking procedural knowledge. This study also revealed two different forms of address and teaching actions in PST interventions along with three categories of acts of communication barriers. The broader implications of the study for international communities are discussed in accordance with the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashlock, R. B. (2006). Error patterns in computation: A semi-programmed approach (9th ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, G. & Junker, B. W. (2001). Designing developmental assessments: A case study in proportional reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, April 2001, Seattle, WA.

  • Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: Findings from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B. (2012). Ratio and proportion: Research and teaching in mathematics teachers’ education (pre-and in-service mathematics teachers of elementary and middle school classes). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, D., Taber, S., Gorowara, C., & Poetzl, C. (2009). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, T., Allen, D., & Powell, B. S. (1999). Looking together at student work: A companion guide to assessing student learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borasi, R. (1994). Capitalizing on errors as ‘springboards for inquiry’: A teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 166–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brendenfur, J. L. (2008). Connecting elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge to their instructional practices. The Researcher, 21(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briars, D. J., & Siegler, R. S. (1984). A feature analysis of preschooler’s counting knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 20, 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, G. W., Chambers, D. L., & Vacc, N. N. (Eds.). (1999). Incorporating cognitively guided instruction into elementary preservice teacher education programs: Results from a National Science Foundation research project. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

  • Brown, C., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, S. P. (2005). Recognizing and responding to cultural differences in the education of culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(4), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currier, S., Cramer, K., & Post, T. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications (pp. 159–178). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossey, J., Halvorsen, K., & McCrone, S. (2008). Mathematics education in the United States 2008, a capsule summary fact book. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R. G., Brown, C. A., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: Complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 8–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C. Linares, S., & Valls, J. (2011). Development of prospective mathematics teachers’ professional noticing in a specific domain: Proportional reasoning. In the Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 329–336). PME.

  • Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boero, P., & Garuti, R. (1992). A sequence of proportionality problems: An exploratory study in the proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, XVI (Vol. 1, pp. 225–232). Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire.

  • Hart, K. (1981). Ratio and proportion. In K. M. Hart (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: [ages] 11–16 (pp. 88–101). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. (1984). Ratio: Children’s strategies and errors. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, K., & Sterba-Boatwright, B. (2008). The when and why of using proportions. Mathematics Teachers, 101, 528–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (2001). Blocks as a tool for learning: A historical and contemporary perspective. Young Children, 56(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, E., & McMahon, M. T. (2005). Interpreting middle school students’ proportional reasoning strategies: Observations from preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J., & West, M. (1994). Missing-value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 235–287). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Early adolescents’ proportional reasoning on ‘rate’ problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2007). How students view the general nature of their errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K. H. (2009). Burning the candle at just one end: Using nonproportional examples helps students determine when proportional strategies apply. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14, 492–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewborn, D. S. (2000). Learning to teach elementary mathematics: Ecological elements of a field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Ott, L. R., & Longnecker, M. T. (2001). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, V., & Llinares, S. (2003). Four student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning on functions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R. (2005). Practices and beliefs in mistake-handling activities: A video study of Italian and US mathematics lesson. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppenbach, M., Flevares, L. M., Sims, L. M., & Perry, M. (2007). Teachers’ responses to student mistakes in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, J., & Crespo, S. (2009). Prospective teachers’ reasoning about students’ non-traditional strategies when dividing fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 236–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, J., & Sinclaire, N. (2010). How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student geometric errors. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher’s reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K., Helme, S., Steinle, V., Baturo, A., Irwin, K., & Bana, J. (2001). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge of difficulties in decimal numeration. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streefland, L. (1984). Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process. Part I. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(3), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions, an integrated perspective. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school, 93–118. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127–174). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R., & Junker, B. W. (2004). Model specification for cognitive assessment of proportional reasoning. Department of Statistics technical report #777. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University

  • Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Ji-Won Son

Authors
  1. Ji-Won Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Won Son.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Son, JW. How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student errors: ratio and proportion in similar rectangles. Educ Stud Math 84, 49–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9475-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9475-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation