Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’ ability to identify and explain students’ actions in near and far figural pattern generalization tasks

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore middle school in-service mathematics teachers’ ability (1) to identify and explain students’ actions in pattern generalization and (2) to account for the variation in teachers’ explanations of students’ actions in terms of task and teachers’ factors. Two questionnaires were developed: (1) a questionnaire to measure teachers’ ability to identify students’ actions while finding the nth term in the pattern generalization and (2) a questionnaire to measure teachers’ ability to explain students’ actions in different tasks. The two questionnaires were given to a sample of 83 middle school in-service mathematics teachers from 22 schools in Lebanon. Analysis of data shows that teachers seemed to have the ability to identify students’ actions while finding the nth term in the pattern generalization and that teachers’ explanations of students’ actions in different tasks are lacking in terms of identifying variable-related counting elements. The results of stepwise multiple regression show that teachers’ ability to explain students’ actions to find the general term depends on their ability to explain students’ step-by-step counting or drawing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). “Rising the challenge”: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM, 40, 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BouJaoude, S., & El-Mouhayar, R. (2010). Teacher education in Lebanon: Trends and issues. In K. Karras & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education world-wide (Vol. 2, pp. 309–332). Athens: Atrapos Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B. L., & Hoyles, C. (2009). Generalisation and perceptual agility: How did teachers fare in a quadratic generalising problem? Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 29(2), 13–18.

  • De Bock, D., van Dooren, W., Jannsens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Improper use of linear reasoning: An in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students’ errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. ZDM, 40, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L., & Warren, E. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, A. (2005). Studying students’ reasoning in writing generalizations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(6), 284–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, J. (2003). Developing algebraic reasoning through generalization. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(7), 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, J., Barker, D., & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic generalisation strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1954). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and construction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 297–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2007). Abduction–induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2008). Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns. ZDM, 40(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2009). Algebraic reasoning through patterns. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(4), 212–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., Silver, E., & Stein, M. (2005). Improving instruction in algebra: Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. (2008). Seventh-grade students’ representations for pictorial growth and change problems. ZDM, 40, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D., & Johanning, D. (2004). A schematic–theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, J. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeap, B.-H., & Kaur, B. (2008). Elementary school students engaging in making generalisation: A glimpse from a Singapore classroom. ZDM, 40, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the University Research Board at the American University of Beirut.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Eid Jurdak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El Mouhayar, R.R., Jurdak, M.E. Teachers’ ability to identify and explain students’ actions in near and far figural pattern generalization tasks. Educ Stud Math 82, 379–396 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9434-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9434-6

Keywords

Navigation