Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching Undergraduate Mathematics on the Internet

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet education in mathematics is developing as a new mode of teaching with its own characteristics and possibilities, different from the traditional way of teaching. In a study presented in two parts, we attempt to capture the world of Internet teaching of undergraduate mathematics. In the first part of the study (Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A.: 2004, ‘Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the web 1: Technologies and taxonomy’), we attempt to create some order in the huge number of activities that are available on the web with a graphical classification of the different types of web courses and discuss some of the technologies involved. In this, the second part of the study, we discuss attributes and implications of this mode of teaching/learning mathematics, also mentioning some of the benefits and concerns. Speculation about the future in such a fluid environment is both risky and fascinating but we nevertheless envisage some possible future trends. Research on this mode of teaching is sparse and open research questions are plentiful. We list possible research issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G.D., Stecher, M. and Yasskin, P.B. 1998, The Web-Based Mathematics Course, a survey of the required features for an on-line math course, Syllabus Magazine, Nov/Dec 1998.

  • Allen, G.D. 2001, ‘Online calculus – the course and survey results’, Computers in the Schools 17(1/2), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. and Dwyer, M. 1998, ‘The impact of student verbal/visual learning style preference on implementing groupware in the classroom’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2(2), 61–69. Retrieved 1 October 2003 from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/index.asp.

  • Berge, Z.L. 1999, ‘Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning’, Educational Technology 18(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookman, J. and Malone, D. 2002, ‘Negotiating roles and meaning while learning mathematics in interactive technology-rich environments–An exploratory study and emerging concept of collaborative learning styles’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, in press.

  • Booth, D., Butler, M., Emery, D., Horan, R., Middleton, W. and Pountney, W. 2001, ‘Issues for web delivered assessment’, in Proceedings of the Twenty Seventh Undergraduate Mathematics Teaching Conference, Birmingham, pp. 56–64.

  • Branon, R.F. and Essex, C. 2001, ‘Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education’, TechTrends 45(1), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.H. 2003, ‘Towards a model for m-learning in Africa’, International Journal of E-Learning, in press.

  • Bruner, J. 1990, Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, D. and Zand, H. 2000, ‘Computers and undergraduate mathematics. 1: Setting the scene’, Computers and Education 35, 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniewicz, L. 2001, ‘Reflections on learning online – The hype and the reality’, South African Journal of Higher Education 15(3), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, M. and Funke, B.L. 1998, ‘University faculty and student perceptions of Web-based instruction’, Journal of Distance Education 13(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duderstadt, J.J. 1999, ‘Can colleges and universities survive in the information age’? in Z.L. Berge and M.P. Collins (eds.), Dancing with the Devil: Information Technology and the New Competition in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, B. 2000, ‘Interactive mathematics online for school and home’, in Presentation at ICME-9, Tokyo, July 2000. Retrieved 29 October 2003 from http://www.mathsnet.net/courses/icme9.

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2001a, ‘WWW Mathematics at the University of Pretoria: The trial run’, South African Journal of Science 97(9/10), 368–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2001b, ‘Internet calculus: An option’? Quaestiones Mathematicae Supplement 1, 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2002a, ‘Cooperative learning as a tool for enhancing a web-based Calculus course’, in Proceedings of the ICTM2, Crete, July 2002.

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2002b, ‘A qualitative investigation on the impact of web-based undergraduate mathematics teaching on developing academic maturity’, Technical Report UPWT 2002/13.

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2003a, ‘Online assessment in mathematics: Multiple assessment formats’, New Zealand Journal of Mathematics 32(Suppl.), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2003b, ‘Combining online and paper assessment in a web-based course in undergraduate mathematics’, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, in press.

  • Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. 2005, ‘Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the web. 1: Technologies and taxonomy’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 58(2), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firdyiwek, Y. 1999, ‘Web-based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy’? Educational Technology 39, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L.M., Teles, S. and Turoff, M. 1997, ‘Networked learning: A paradigm for the twenty first century’, ‘Learning Networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online’.

  • Hawisher, G.E. and Pemberton, M.A.1997, ‘Writing across the curriculum encounters asynchronous learning networks or WAC meets up with ALN’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1(1), 61–69. Retrieved 1 October 2003 from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/index.asp

  • Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Stoney, S. and Willis, J. 2001, ‘The development of an instrument to audit online units’, in Proceedings of the 18th conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 2001, Melbourne, pp. 263–270. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from http://www.medfac.unimelb.edu.au/ascilite2001/pubs/index.html

  • Hibberd, S. 1996, ‘The mathematical assessment of students entering university engineering courses’, Studies in Educational Evaluation 22(4), 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K.B. 2001, ‘Is the internet a classroom’? TechTrends 45(5), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K.B. and Harmon, S.W. 2000, ‘A multiple-case study of exemplary internet courses’, Ed at a Distance Magazine and Ed Journal 14(9), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isoda, M., Lee, Y.-S., Aoyama, K. and Ishizuka, M. 2002, ‘The study of mathematics communication on internet with palmtop computer’, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the Undergraduate Level, Hersonissos, Greece, July 2002.

  • Johnson, C.M. 2001, ‘A survey of current research on online communities of practice’, Internet and Higher Education 4, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.F. 2003, ‘Toward a philosophy of online education’, in B.G. Brown (ed.), Developing Faculty to Use Technology, Programmes and Strategies to Enhance Teaching, Anker Publishing Company, Bolton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. 2002, ‘Synchronous and asynchronous communication in online instruction’, Retrieved 30 October 2003 from http://www.breakthebarriers.com/synch-asynch.html.

  • Kawski, M. 2003, Personal communication.

  • Kearsley, G. 1995, ‘The nature and value of interaction in distance learning’, in Proceedings of the Invitational Research Conference in Distance Education: Towards Excellence in Distance Education: A Research Agenda, The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, Pennsylvania State University, pp. 366–374.

  • Kearsley, G. 2002, ‘Is online learning for everybody’? Educational Technology, 41–44.

  • Khan, B.H. (ed.): 1997, Web-Based Instruction, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs.

  • Leh, A.S. 2001, ‘Action research on training students to become independent learners’, TechTrends 45(1), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, C.J., Stodel, E.J., Farres, L.G., Breithaupt, K. and Gabriel, M.A. 2001, ‘The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning’, Internet and Higher Education 4, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. 1999, ‘The origins of distance educations and its use in the United States’, T.H.E. Journal 27(2), 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskulin, R.G.S., Amorin, J.A. and Jorge, F.M. 2002, ‘Interactivity in mathematics education: Collaborative knowledge generation in internet based sharing environment’, in Proceedings of the International Conference The Humanistic Renaissance in Mathematics Education, Setembro 2002, Palermo, pp. 273-278. Retrieved 28 October 2003 from http://www.cempem.fae.unicamp.br/lapemmec.

  • Myers, K.L. 1999, ‘Is there a place for instructional design in the information age’? Educational Technology 39(6), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K.-C. 2001, ‘Using e-mail to foster collaboration in distance education’, Open Learning 16(2), 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory, J.C., Bullock, C. and Burnaska, K. 1997, ‘Gender similarity in the use of and attitudes about ALN in a university setting’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1(1), 39–51. Retrieved 1 October 2003 from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue1/ory.htm

  • Parloff, R. and Pratt, K. 1999, Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R.D. 1987, ‘Cognitive technologies for mathematics education’, in A.H. Schoenfeld (ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Porter, L.R. 1997, Creating the Virtual Classroom: Distance Learning with the Internet, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C. and Reeves, P.M. 1997, ‘The effective dimensions of interactive learning on the WWW’, in B.H. Khan (ed.), Web-Based Instruction, 59-66, Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs.

  • Sangwin, C.J. 2004, ‘Assessing mathematics automatically using computer algebra and the internet’, Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications 23(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H. 1988, ‘Uses of computers in mathematics instruction’, in D.A. Smith, G. Porter, L. Leinbach and R. Wenger (eds.), Computers and Mathematics: The Uses of Computers in Undergraduate Instruction, Mathematical Association of America, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, A. and Selden, J. 1997, ‘Should mathematicians and mathematics educators be listening to cognitive psychologists’? M.A.A Research Sampler 2. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from http://www.maa.org/t_and_l/sampler/rs_2.html

  • Simonson, M., Smaldio, S., Albright, M. and Zvacek, S. 2000, Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundation of Distance Education, Merrill, Upper Saddle River.

  • Sims, R., Dobbs, G. and Hand, T. 2001, ‘Proactive evaluation: New perspectives for ensuring quality in online learning applications’, in Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 2001, Melbourne, pp. 509–517. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from http://www.medfac.unimelb.edu.au/ascilite2001/pubs/index.html.

  • Smith, G. and Wood, L. 2000, ‘Assessment of learning in university mathematics’, International Journal for Mathematics Education in Science and Technology31(1), 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, M.J. 2000, ‘Effective learning and the virtual learning environment’, in EUNIS 2000: Towards Virtual Universities: Proceedings of the European University Information System 2000 Conference held at INFOSYSTEM 2000, Poznan, Poland, Poznan: Instytut Informatyki Politechniki Poznanskiej, pp. 171–180.

  • Stokes, S.P. 2001, ‘Satisfaction of college students with the digital learning environment: Do learners’ temperaments make a difference’? Internet and Higher Education 4, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suanpang, P., Petocz, P. and Kalceff, W. 2003, Student Attitudes to Learning Business Statistics Online vs. Traditional Methods, Learning for unknown future, New Zealand, HERSA, 6–9 July 2003.

  • Swan, K., Shea, P., Frederickson, E., Pickette, A. Pelz, W. and Maher, G. 2000, ‘Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact, and communication in the virtual classroom’, Journal of Educational Computing Research 23(4), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. 1994, ‘Computer environments for the learning of mathematics’, in R. Biehler, R.W. Scholz, R. Strasser and B. Winkelmann (eds.), Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S.C. and Hung, D. 2002, ‘Beyond information pumping: Creating a constructivist e-learning environment’, Educational Technology 42(5), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1987, (Transl. N. Minick), The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1, Problems of General Psychology, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldock, J., Gretton, H. and Challis, N. 2001, ‘Using the Web to enhance student learning, in Proceedings of ICTM2, Crete.

  • Wepner, S.B. and Mobley, M.M. 1998, ‘Reaping new harvests: Collaboration and communication through field experiences’, Action in Teacher Education 20(3), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann Engelbrecht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A. Teaching Undergraduate Mathematics on the Internet. Educ Stud Math 58, 253–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-6457-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-6457-2

Key Words

Navigation