Abstract
This study aimed to replicate findings that demonstrated impact on students’ reading comprehension and social studies content learning. Using a randomized control trial, intervention, and outcome measures, this study was replicated in 85 8th-grade social studies classes with 19 teachers. Teachers were provided professional development on comprehension canopy, essential words, knowledge acquisition, and the use of team-based learning. Measures of reading comprehension administered at pre- and post-testing and measure of vocabulary and knowledge acquisition was administered at pre-, post-, and two follow-up times, 4 and eight weeks following treatment. On the measure of vocabulary and knowledge acquisition, students in the treatment condition outperformed those in the comparison condition at all time points. There were no statistically significant differences for reading comprehension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, D., & Eno, J. (2012). Signature pedagogy: a literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 70–94. doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.658347.
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.
Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: a review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 68–84.
Burman, L. E., Reed, W. R., & Alm, J. (2010). A call for replication studies. Public Finance Review, 38(6), 787–793. doi:10.1177/1091142110385210.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354.
Chiodo, J. J., & Byford, J. (2004). Do they really dislike social studies? A study of middle school and high school students. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 16–26.
Choi, J., Fan, W., & Hancock, G. R. (2009). A note on confidence intervals for two-group latent mean effect size measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(3), 396–406. doi:10.1080/00273170902938902.
Dunlosky, J. (2013). Strengthening the student toolbox: study strategies to boost learning. American Educator, 37, 12–21.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1991). Background and instructional effects on achievement in eighth-grade English and social studies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1(3), 277–300. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0103_5.
Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rate reliability: how to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. Gaithersburg: STATAXIS Publishing Company.
Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: the role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 88–110. doi:10.1080/19345740802539325.
MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L. G., & Hughes, K. E. (2006). Gates–MacGinitie reading test (4th ed.). Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.
Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: how often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537–542. doi:10.1177/1745691612460688.
Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51. doi:10.1002/tl.467.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables; user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Muthen, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. doi:10.1007/BF02294365.
Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2004). A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: Center of Multilevel Modeling.
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: an interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software on CD-ROM].
Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., Haring, C., Ciullo, S., & McCulley, L. (2013). Intervention fidelity in special and general education research journals. The Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 3–13.
Swanson, E. A., Wanzek. J., McCulley, L. V., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., Fogarty, M., & Hairrell, A. (2014). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.910718.
Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M., & Simmons, D. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2011). Procedures and standards handbook (21st ed.). Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: bad copy. Nature, 298–300. doi:10.1038/485298a.
Acknowledgments
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305F100013 to The University of Texas at Austin as part of the Reading for Understanding Research Initiative. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Swanson, E.A. et al. Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 31–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2