Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication

  • Replication
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to replicate findings that demonstrated impact on students’ reading comprehension and social studies content learning. Using a randomized control trial, intervention, and outcome measures, this study was replicated in 85 8th-grade social studies classes with 19 teachers. Teachers were provided professional development on comprehension canopy, essential words, knowledge acquisition, and the use of team-based learning. Measures of reading comprehension administered at pre- and post-testing and measure of vocabulary and knowledge acquisition was administered at pre-, post-, and two follow-up times, 4 and eight weeks following treatment. On the measure of vocabulary and knowledge acquisition, students in the treatment condition outperformed those in the comparison condition at all time points. There were no statistically significant differences for reading comprehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, D., & Eno, J. (2012). Signature pedagogy: a literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 70–94. doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.658347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: a review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, L. E., Reed, W. R., & Alm, J. (2010). A call for replication studies. Public Finance Review, 38(6), 787–793. doi:10.1177/1091142110385210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiodo, J. J., & Byford, J. (2004). Do they really dislike social studies? A study of middle school and high school students. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Fan, W., & Hancock, G. R. (2009). A note on confidence intervals for two-group latent mean effect size measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(3), 396–406. doi:10.1080/00273170902938902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J. (2013). Strengthening the student toolbox: study strategies to boost learning. American Educator, 37, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1991). Background and instructional effects on achievement in eighth-grade English and social studies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1(3), 277–300. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0103_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rate reliability: how to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. Gaithersburg: STATAXIS Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: the role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 88–110. doi:10.1080/19345740802539325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L. G., & Hughes, K. E. (2006). Gates–MacGinitie reading test (4th ed.). Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: how often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537–542. doi:10.1177/1745691612460688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51. doi:10.1002/tl.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables; user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. doi:10.1007/BF02294365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2004). A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: Center of Multilevel Modeling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: an interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software on CD-ROM].

  • Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., Haring, C., Ciullo, S., & McCulley, L. (2013). Intervention fidelity in special and general education research journals. The Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 3–13.

  • Swanson, E. A., Wanzek. J., McCulley, L. V., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., Fogarty, M., & Hairrell, A. (2014). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.910718.

  • Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M., & Simmons, D. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.

  • What Works Clearinghouse. (2011). Procedures and standards handbook (21st ed.). Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: bad copy. Nature, 298–300. doi:10.1038/485298a.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305F100013 to The University of Texas at Austin as part of the Reading for Understanding Research Initiative. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Vaughn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Swanson, E.A. et al. Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 31–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2

Keywords

Navigation