A Metaanalysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
This study examines the impact of computer technology (CT) on mathematics education in K12 classrooms through a systematic review of existing literature. A metaanalysis of 85 independent effect sizes extracted from 46 primary studies involving a total of 36,793 learners indicated statistically significant positive effects of CT on mathematics achievement. In addition, several characteristics of primary studies were identified as having effects. For example, CT showed advantage in promoting mathematics achievement of elementary over secondary school students. As well, CT showed larger effects on the mathematics achievement of special need students than that of general education students, the positive effect of CT was greater when combined with a constructivist approach to teaching than with a traditional approach to teaching, and studies that used nonstandardized tests as measures of mathematics achievement reported larger effects of CT than studies that used standardized tests. The weighted least squares univariate and multiple regression analyses indicated that mathematics achievement could be accounted for by a few technology, implementation and learner characteristics in the studies.
 Albright, M, Graf, D (1992) Teaching in the Information Age: The role of educational technology. JosseyBass, San Francisco
 Anderson, J, Boyle, F (1985) Intelligent tutoring systems. Science 228: pp. 456462 CrossRef
 Anderson, J, Corbett, A (1995) Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences 4: pp. 167207 CrossRef
 Ball, S (1988) Computers, concrete materials and teaching fractions. School Science and Mathematics 88: pp. 470475 CrossRef
 Braden, JP, Shaw, SR (1991) An evaluation of a computerassisted instructional program for elementary hearingimpaired students. The Volta Review 93: pp. 247252
 Brush, TA (1997) The effects of group composition on achievement and time on task for students completing ILS activities in cooperative pairs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 30: pp. 217
 Burns, PK, Bozeman, WC (1981) Computerassisted instruction and mathematics achievement: Is there a relationship?. Educational Technology 21: pp. 3239
 Burrill, G, Allison, J (1992) Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Texas Instruments Corp., Dallas, TX
 Char, C (1989) Computer graphics feltboards: New software approaches for young children's mathematical exploration. American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
 Christmann, E, Badgett, J (1997) Microcomputerbased computerassisted instruction within differing subject areas: A statistical deduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 16: pp. 281296 CrossRef
 Clark, R (1983) Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53: pp. 445460
 Clements, D (1998) Young Children and Technology. Forum on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education, Washington, DC
 Coley, R, Cradleer, J (2000) Computers and the classroom: The status of technology in US schools. Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service, Princeton
 Cooper, J, Heron, T (1987) Applied behavior analysis. Merrill, Columbus
 Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
 Farrell, AM (1996) Roles and behaviors in technologyintegrated precalculus classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 15: pp. 3553 CrossRef
 Fuchs, LS, Fuchs, D (1998) General educators' instructional adaptation for students with learning disabilities.. Learning Disability Quarterly 21: pp. 2333 CrossRef
 Fuchs, L, Fuchs, D (2002) Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem solving performance of students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 17: pp. 90106 CrossRef
 Funkhouser, C (1993) The influence of problemsolving software on student attitudes about mathematics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 25: pp. 339346
 Gaur, A, Gaur, S (2006) Statistical methods for practice and research: A guide to data analysis using SPSS. Sage, Thousand Oaks
 Glass, G. V., B. McGaw, et al. (1981). Metaanalysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA, SAGE.
 Hartley, S. S. (1977). Metaanalysis of the effects of individually paced instruction in mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts International 38(7A): University Microfilms No. 7729, 926.
 Hecht, J. B., N. K. Roberts, et al. (1995). Teacher Teams and Computer Technology. 1995 Annual Meeting of the MidWestern Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
 Hedges, L, Olkin, I (1985) Statistical methods for metaanalyses. Academic, Orlando
 Hembree, R, Dessart, DJ (1986) Effects of handheld calculators in precollege mathematics education: A metaanalysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 17: pp. 8399 CrossRef
 Irish, C (2002) Using peg and keyword mnemonics and computerassisted instruction to enhance basic multiplication performance in elementary students with learning and cognitive disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology 17: pp. 2940
 Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics in education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.
 Kieran, C, Hillel, J (1990) It's tough when you have to make the triangles angles: Insights from a computerbased geometry environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 9: pp. 99127
 Kim, S (1993) The relative effectiveness of handson and computersimulated manipulative in teaching seriation, classification, geometric, and arithmetic concepts to kindergarten children. Dissertation Abstracts International 54: pp. 3319
 Koedinger, KR, Anderson, JR (1997) Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8: pp. 3043
 Kozma, R. (2001). Learning with media. In D. P. Ely and T. Plomp (Eds.), Classic writings on instructional technology (pp. 155–188). Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
 Kulik, C, Kulik, J (1986) Effectiveness of computerbased education in colleges. AEDS Journal 19: pp. 81108
 Kulik, C, Kulik, J (1991) Effectiveness of computerbased instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 7: pp. 7594 CrossRef
 Kulik, J, Kulik, C (1980) Effectiveness of computerbased college teaching: A metaanalysis of findings. Review of Educational Research 50: pp. 525544
 Kulik, K, Schwalb, B (1982) Programmed instruction in secondary education: A metaanalysis of evaluation findings.. Journal of Educational Research 75: pp. 133138
 Kulik, J, BangertDrowns, R (1983) Effects of computer based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: pp. 1926 CrossRef
 Li, Q. (2004). Technology and mathematics education: Any impact? The Eleventh International Literacy and Education Research Network Conference on Learning, La Havana.
 Lipsey, M, Wilson, D (2001) Practical metaanalysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks
 Lou, Y, Abrami, PC (2001) Small group and individual learning with technology: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research 71: pp. 449521 CrossRef
 Means, B (1994) The technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. JosseyBass, San Francisco
 Moreno, R, Mayer, RE (2000) Multimediasupported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction 17: pp. 215248 CrossRef
 Mushi, S (2000) Use of interactive video technology to teach middle school mathematics. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago
 Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author, Reston
 Niemiec, R, Walberg, H (1985) Computers and achievement in the elementary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1: pp. 435440 CrossRef
 Niemiec, R, Samson, G (1987) The effects of computerbased instruction inclementary schools: A quantitative synthesis. Journal for Research on Computing in Education 20: pp. 85103
 Nute, N (1997) The impact of engagement activity and manipulatives presentation on intermediate mathematics achievement, timeontask, learning efficiency and attitude. Dissertation Abstracts International 58: pp. 2988
 Reimer, K, Moyer, PS (2005) Thirdgraders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 24: pp. 525
 Rosenthal, R (1991) Metaanalytic procedures for social research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
 Rosenthal, R, Rosnow, RL (1984) Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGrawHill, New York
 Royer, JM, Greene, BA (1994) Can U.S. developed CAI work effectively in a developing country?. Journal of Educational Computing Research 10: pp. 4161 CrossRef
 Salerno, CA (1995) The effect of time on computerassisted instruction for atrisk students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28: pp. 8597
 Shyu, HY (1999) Effects of media attributes in anchored instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 21: pp. 119139 CrossRef
 Smith, C, McLaughlin, M (1997) Conduct control on usenet. Journal of Computermediated Communication 2: pp. 111
 Suh, J, Moyer, PS (2005) Examining technology uses in the classroom: Developing fraction sense using virtual manipulative concept tutorials. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning 3: pp. 121
 Terry, M (1996) An investigation of differences in cognition when utilizing math manipulatives and math manipulative software. Dissertation Abstracts International 56: pp. 2650
 Woodward, J (1995) Technologybased research in mathematics for special education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 17: pp. 323
 Woodward, J, Reith, D (1995) Technologybased research in mathematics for special education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 17: pp. 323
 Xin, J. F. (1999). Computerassisted cooperative learning in integrated classrooms for students with and without disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual: 61–78.
 Ysseldyke, J, Spicuzza, R (2003) Using a curriculumbased instructional management system to enhance math achievement in urban schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk 8: pp. 247265 CrossRef
 *Ash, J. (2005). The effects of computerassisted instruction on middle school mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tennessee State University.
 *Berryman, H. (1999). The effects of technology education labs on third grade mathematics scores. University of Sarasota, Sarasota, FL.
 *Blanton, W. E., Moorman, G. B., Hayes, B. A., & Warner, M. L. (1997). Effects of participation in the fifth dimension on far transfer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 371–396.
 *Carter, C., & Smith, L. (2002). Does the use of learning logic in algebra I make a difference in algebra II? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 157–161.
 *Chute, R., & Miksad, J. (1997). Computer assisted instruction and cognitive development in preschoolers. Child Study Journal, 27, 237–253.
 *Clariana, R. (1996). Differential achievement gains for mathematics computation, concepts, and applications with an integrated learning system. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science, 15, 203–215.
 *Clark, D. (2004). The effects of using computerassisted instruction of assist high school geometry students achieve higher levels of success on the Florida Competency Achievement Test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union Institute and University, Cincinnati, Ohio.
 *Connell, M. L. (1998). Technology in constructivist mathematics classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17, 311–338.
 *Feng, S., & Caleo, J. (2000). Playing computer games versus better learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association. Clearwater, FL.
 *Fischer, E. (1997). The effects of applied technology instruction on mathematics achievement and career interests of urban seventhgrade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University.
 *Forde, T. B. (2003). The effects of technologysupported cognitive mathematical instruction on AfricanAmerican students characterized as atrisk for school failure. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
 *Funkhouser, C. (2003). The effects of computeraugmented geometry instruction on student performance and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 163–175.
 *Iskander, W., & Curtis, S. (2005). Use of colour and interactive animation in learning 3D vectors. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24, 149–156.
 *Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive elearning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 83–93.
 *Lester. (1996). The effects of the geometer's sketchpad software on achievement of geometric knowledge of high school geometry students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco, San Francisco.
 *Lewis, S. K. (2004). The relationship of fulltime laptop computer access to student achievement and student attitudes in middle school. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
 *Ling, S. (2004). Enhancing the learning of conics with technology. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University Dominguez Hills, Dominguez Hills.
 *Mac Iver, D. J., Balfanz, R., & Plank, S. B. (1998). The talent development middle school. An elective replacement approach to providing extra help in math—The CATAMA program (computer and teamassisted mathematics acceleration). Report No. 21. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
 *Martindale, T., Pearson, C., Curda, L. K., & Pilcher, J. (2005). Effects of an online instructional application on reading and mathematics standardized test scores. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 349–360.
 *McBride, R. O., & Lewis, G. (1993). Sharing the resources: electronic outreach programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 372–386.
 *Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimediasupported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 215–248.
 *Olkun, S. (2003). Comparing computer versus concrete manipulatives in learning 2D geometry. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22, 43–56.
 *Page, M. (2002). Technologyenriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socioeconomic status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 389–409.
 *Phillips, C. K. (2001). The effects of an integrated computer program on mathematics and reading improvement in grades three through five. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
 *Quinn, D. W., & Quinn, N. W. (2001a). PLATO evaluation series. Grades 1–8, Apache Junction Unified School District 43, Apache Junction, Arizona. Bloomington, MN: PLATO Learning, Inc.
 *Quinn, D. W., & Quinn, N. W. (2001b). PLATO evaluation series. Jobs for YouthBoston, Madison Park TechnicalVocational H.S. Boston, Massachusetts. Bloomington, MN: PLATO Learning, Inc.
 *Schpilberg, B., & Hubschman, B. (2003). Facetoface and computer mediated tutoring: A comparative exploration on high school students' math achievement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference. Chicago, IL.
 *Shyu, H. Y. (2000). Using videobased anchored instruction to enhance learning: Taiwan's experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 57–69.
 *Smith, B. (2002). The impact of the utilization of advantage learning systems' technology on students' academic achievement. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Tennessee State University.
 *Soeder, K. (2001). The effect of computeraided instruction on mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Immaculata College.
 *Wheeler, J. L., & Regian, J. W. (1999). The use of a cognitive tutoring system in the improvement of the abstract reasoning component of word problem solving. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, 243–254.
 *Wittman, T. K., Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & HamodeyDouglas, S. (1998). Computer assisted automatization of multiplication facts reduces mathematics anxiety in elementary school children. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. St. Louis, MO.
 *Wodarz, N. (1994). The effects of computer usage on elementary students' attitudes, motivation and achievement in mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
 *Ysseldyke, J., Betts, J., Thill, T., & Hannigan, E. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to improve mathematics skills for students in Title 1 programs. Preventing School Failure, 48(4), 10–14.
 *Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 163–173.
 *Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., Teelucksingh, E., Boys, C., & Lemkuil, A. (2003). Using a curriculumbased instructional management system to enhance math achievement in urban schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 8, 247–265.
 *Ysseldyke, J., Tardrew, S., Betts, J., Thill, T., & Hannigan, E. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to enhance math instruction of gifted and talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 293–310
 *Zumwalt, D. (2001). The effectiveness of computer aided instruction in eighth grade prealgebra classrooms 1061Q6 in Idaho. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Idaho State University, Idaho.
 Title
 A Metaanalysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning
 Journal

Educational Psychology Review
Volume 22, Issue 3 , pp 215243
 Cover Date
 20100901
 DOI
 10.1007/s1064801091258
 Print ISSN
 1040726X
 Online ISSN
 1573336X
 Publisher
 Springer US
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Keywords

 Metaanalysis
 Technology
 Mathematics
 Achievement
 Attitude