*Ash, J. (2005). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on middle school mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tennessee State University.
*Berryman, H. (1999). The effects of technology education labs on third grade mathematics scores. University of Sarasota, Sarasota, FL.
*Blanton, W. E., Moorman, G. B., Hayes, B. A., & Warner, M. L. (1997). Effects of participation in the fifth dimension on far transfer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 371–396.
*Carter, C., & Smith, L. (2002). Does the use of learning logic in algebra I make a difference in algebra II? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 157–161.
*Chute, R., & Miksad, J. (1997). Computer assisted instruction and cognitive development in preschoolers. Child Study Journal, 27, 237–253.
*Clariana, R. (1996). Differential achievement gains for mathematics computation, concepts, and applications with an integrated learning system. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science, 15, 203–215.
*Clark, D. (2004). The effects of using computer-assisted instruction of assist high school geometry students achieve higher levels of success on the Florida Competency Achievement Test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union Institute and University, Cincinnati, Ohio.
*Connell, M. L. (1998). Technology in constructivist mathematics classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17, 311–338.
*Feng, S., & Caleo, J. (2000). Playing computer games versus better learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association. Clearwater, FL.
*Fischer, E. (1997). The effects of applied technology instruction on mathematics achievement and career interests of urban seventh-grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University.
*Forde, T. B. (2003). The effects of technology-supported cognitive mathematical instruction on African-American students characterized as at-risk for school failure. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
*Funkhouser, C. (2003). The effects of computer-augmented geometry instruction on student performance and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 163–175.
*Iskander, W., & Curtis, S. (2005). Use of colour and interactive animation in learning 3D vectors. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24, 149–156.
*Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 83–93.
*Lester. (1996). The effects of the geometer's sketchpad software on achievement of geometric knowledge of high school geometry students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco, San Francisco.
*Lewis, S. K. (2004). The relationship of full-time laptop computer access to student achievement and student attitudes in middle school. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
*Ling, S. (2004). Enhancing the learning of conics with technology. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University Dominguez Hills, Dominguez Hills.
*Mac Iver, D. J., Balfanz, R., & Plank, S. B. (1998). The talent development middle school. An elective replacement approach to providing extra help in math—The CATAMA program (computer- and team-assisted mathematics acceleration). Report No. 21. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
*Martindale, T., Pearson, C., Curda, L. K., & Pilcher, J. (2005). Effects of an online instructional application on reading and mathematics standardized test scores. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 349–360.
*McBride, R. O., & Lewis, G. (1993). Sharing the resources: electronic outreach programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 372–386.
*Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 215–248.
*Olkun, S. (2003). Comparing computer versus concrete manipulatives in learning 2D geometry. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22, 43–56.
*Page, M. (2002). Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socioeconomic status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 389–409.
*Phillips, C. K. (2001). The effects of an integrated computer program on mathematics and reading improvement in grades three through five. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
*Quinn, D. W., & Quinn, N. W. (2001a). PLATO evaluation series. Grades 1–8, Apache Junction Unified School District 43, Apache Junction, Arizona. Bloomington, MN: PLATO Learning, Inc.
*Quinn, D. W., & Quinn, N. W. (2001b). PLATO evaluation series. Jobs for Youth-Boston, Madison Park Technical-Vocational H.S. Boston, Massachusetts. Bloomington, MN: PLATO Learning, Inc.
*Schpilberg, B., & Hubschman, B. (2003). Face-to-face and computer mediated tutoring: A comparative exploration on high school students' math achievement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference. Chicago, IL.
*Shyu, H. Y. (2000). Using video-based anchored instruction to enhance learning: Taiwan's experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 57–69.
*Smith, B. (2002). The impact of the utilization of advantage learning systems' technology on students' academic achievement. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Tennessee State University.
*Soeder, K. (2001). The effect of computer-aided instruction on mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Immaculata College.
*Wheeler, J. L., & Regian, J. W. (1999). The use of a cognitive tutoring system in the improvement of the abstract reasoning component of word problem solving. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, 243–254.
*Wittman, T. K., Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Hamodey-Douglas, S. (1998). Computer assisted automatization of multiplication facts reduces mathematics anxiety in elementary school children. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. St. Louis, MO.
*Wodarz, N. (1994). The effects of computer usage on elementary students' attitudes, motivation and achievement in mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
*Ysseldyke, J., Betts, J., Thill, T., & Hannigan, E. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to improve mathematics skills for students in Title 1 programs. Preventing School Failure, 48(4), 10–14.
*Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 163–173.
*Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., Teelucksingh, E., Boys, C., & Lemkuil, A. (2003). Using a curriculum-based instructional management system to enhance math achievement in urban schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 8, 247–265.
*Ysseldyke, J., Tardrew, S., Betts, J., Thill, T., & Hannigan, E. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to enhance math instruction of gifted and talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 293–310
*Zumwalt, D. (2001). The effectiveness of computer aided instruction in eighth grade pre-algebra classrooms 1061Q6 in Idaho. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Idaho State University, Idaho.