Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exposure of pollinators to plant protection products

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a general rule, environmental risk for chemicals is characterised by comparing an expected exposure level (e.g. PEC) with an ecotoxicological endpoint. The same approach is generally used for plant protection products (PPPs). However, in some cases, suitable procedures for a precise quantification of exposure are not available. The common risk assessment procedure for pollinators based on the hazard quotient, where the agronomic application rate is assumed as an exposure indicator, is an example. In this work, a semi-quantitative index to assess exposure to PPPs for organisms with a large forage area is presented. The proposed index was already applied in a previous work on risk assessment for pollinators, for this reason the validation steps (sampling area, collected samples, samples distribution) were planned bearing in mind the characteristic and the behaviour of these organisms and using Apis mellifera as representative of pollinators. The starting point for the development of the index is the assumption that exposure depends not only on environmental fate of pesticides but also on the feeding behaviour of the target organisms (in this context meant as target of the assessment). The developed index was applied and validated in different experimental areas of 4 × 4 km located in North-East Italy (Veneto region) characterised by a different level of impact. A sensitivity analysis of the index was performed evaluating the influence of the dataset resolution on the predictive efficiency. The obtained results indicate a good agreement between predicted and measured concentrations, supporting the suitability of the index to improve exposure assessment for pollinators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barmaz S (2009) Plant protection products risk assessment: distribution and experimental validation in terrestrial ecosystems. PhD Thesis, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano. http://boa.unimib.it/handle/10281/7503

  • Barmaz S, Potts SG, Vighi M (2010) A novel method for assessing risks to pollinators from plant protection products using honeybees as a model species. Ecotoxicology 19:1347–1359. doi:10.1007/s10646-010-0521-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calliera M, Balderacchi M, Capri E, Trevisan M (2008) Prediction of agrochemical residues data on fruit using an informatic system (PARDIS model). Pest Manag Sci 64(10):981–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cen Y-P, Bornman J (1990) The response of bean plants to UV-B radiation under different irradiances of background visible light. J Exp Bot 41(11):1489–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen J (1993) Growth, yeald and composition of 4 winter cereals: biomass, grain-yield and yield formation. Neth J Agric Sci 41(2):153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (1996) Using ArcView GIS. ESRI Inc., Redlands, p 340

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Technical guidance document in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances and commission regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and commission directive (EC) 98/8 on biocides, part 1, 2 and 3, 2nd edn. European Commission, Luxembourg, p 760

  • Ganzelmeier H, Rautmann D, Spangenberg R, Streloke M, Herrmann M, Wenzelburger HJ, Water HF (1995) Studies on the spray drift of plant protection products. In: Mitteilungen aus der biologischen bundenstanstalt für land-und fortwirtschaft, heft 305. Blackwell, Berlin. ISSN 0067-5849, ISBN 3-8263-3077-3

  • Gauvrit C (1988) La volatilité des esters d’herbicides hormonaux. Phytoma 395:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M (2002) SPAD readings and associated leaf traits in durum wheat, barley and triticale cultivars. Euphitica 125:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halm M, Rortais A, Arnold G, Taséi JN, Rault S (2006) New risk assessment approach for systemic insecticides: the case of honeybees and imidacloprid (Gaucho). Environ Sci Technol 40:2448–2454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammen VC, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, Budrys E, Christensen TR, Fronzek S, Grabaum R, Jaksic P, Klotz S, Kramarz P, Kroel-Dulay G, Kühn I, Mirtl M, Moora M, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Rortais A, Schulze CH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Stout J, Szentgyörgyi H, Vighi M, Vilà M, Vujic A, Wolf T, Zavala G, Settele J, Kunin WE (2010) Establishment of a cross-European field site network in the ALARM project for assessing large-scale changes in biodiversity. Environ Monit Assess 164:337–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzaro L, Otto S, Zanin G (2008) Role of hedgerows in intercepting spray drift: evaluation and modelling of the effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123(4):317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leistra M (2005) Estimating input data for computations on the volatilisation of pesticides from plant canopies and competing processes. Alterra-rapport 1256. Alterra, Wageningen. ISSN 1566-7197

  • OEPP/EPPO (2003) Environmental risk assessment scheme for plant protection products. Chap 10. Bull OEPP/EPPO 33:141–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto S, Lazzaro L, Finizio A, Zanin G (2009) Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on non target arthropods in field hedgerows. Environ Toxicol Chem 28(4):853–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SANCO/10329/2002 rev 2 final. Guidance document on terrestrial ecotoxicology under council directive 91/414/EEC

  • Settele J, Hammen VC, Hulme P, Karlson U, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kunin W, Marion G, O’Connor M, Petanidou T, Peterson K, Potts SG, Pritchard H, Pyšek P, Rounsevell M, Spangenberg J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes M, Vighi M, Zobel M, Kühn I (2005) ALARM: assessing LArge-scale environmental risks for biodiversity with tested methods—the concept, objectives, structure and management of a large integrated project within the 6th framework programme of the european commission. GAIA 14:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton PJ, Peterson CM, Boote KJ, White JW (1997) Early-season growth in relation to region of domestication, seed size, and leaf traits in common bean. Field Crops Res 52:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PN, Cobb GP, Godard-Codding C, Hoff D, McMurry ST, Rainwater T, Reynolds KD (2007) Contaminant exposure in terrestrial vertebrates. Environ Pollut 150:41–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storkey J (2005) Modelling assimilation rates of 14 temperate arable weed species as a function of the environment and leaf traits. Eur Weed Res Soc Weed Res 45:361–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarazona JV, Vega MM (2002) Hazard and risk assessment of chemicals for terrestrial ecosystems. Toxicology 181–182:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin CDS (ed) (2009) The pesticide manual: a world compendium,15th edn. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaj C (2011) Ecotoxicological effect on structure and function of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. PhD Thesis, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan. http://boa.unimib.it/handle/10281/19729

  • Vicari A, Otto S, Zanin G (2001) Dinamica ambientale degli erbicidi. In: Zanin G, Catizone P (eds) Malerbologia. Pàtron Editore, Bologna, pp 523–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Vile D et al (2005) Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Ann Bot 96:1129–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa S, Vighi M, Finizio A, Bolchi Serini G (2000) Risk assessment for honeybees from pesticides exposed pollen. Ecotoxicology 9:287–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visser AJ, Tosserams M, Groen MW, Kalis G, Kwant R, Magendans GWH, Rozema J (1997) The combined effects of CO2 concentration and enhanced UV-B radiation on faba bean. 3. Leaf optical properties, pigments, stomatal index and epidermal cell density. Plant Ecol 128(1–2):209–222. doi:10.1023/A:1009727410971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B-Z, Nishiyama S, Kang Y (2003) Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agric Water Manag 63:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research supported by the European Commission, Contract No. 506675, ALARM. The PhD grant of S. Barmaz was supported by Syngenta Crop Protection. The PhD grant of A. Ippolito is supported by Dow AgroSciences. The authors are grateful to Mr. Oddino Bin for the help in collecting land use and application data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Vighi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barmaz, S., Vaj, C., Ippolito, A. et al. Exposure of pollinators to plant protection products. Ecotoxicology 21, 2177–2185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-012-0971-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-012-0971-7

Keywords

Navigation