Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Pollution Taxation and Abatement When Leisure and Environmental Quality are Complements

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study optimal environmental policy in a world featuring multiple stable economic-ecological equilibria. There is a two-way interaction between the macro-economy and the environment. We assume that the society under consideration finds itself in a high pollution equilibrium and show that a benevolent social planner is in principle able to engineer substantial welfare gains by choosing the appropriate mix of Pigouvian (capital) taxation and abatement activities. During the initial phase of the policy, abatement is used to reduce the inflow of dirt to zero whereas the tax is employed to bring down the stock of the polluting capital input in an optimal fashion. In the long run abatement is no longer needed and the capital tax settles down at its externality-correcting Pigouvian level. For a plausible parameterization optimal abatement takes place for up to twenty-five years whilst the long-run pollution tax never exceeds seven percent of gross operating surplus. In order to escape out of the pollution trap the full force of the available environmental instruments is only needed temporarily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The details of the ecological SLD system are spelled out in Heijdra and Heijnen (2013, pp. 50–52). For overviews of the SLD literature, see Muradian (2001), Mäler et al. (2003), Brock and Starrett (2003), and Wagener (2009). Economic applications of SLD include Heijnen and Wagener (2013), Ranjan and Shortle (2007), and Wirl (2004). A related nonlinear approach is used by Prieur (2009).

  2. Brock (1977), John and Pecchenino (1994), Michel and Rotillon (1995), Fullerton and Kim (2008), and Quaas et al. (2013) assume that labour supply is exogenous and preferences are nonseparable in consumption and environmental quality.

  3. If lump-sum taxes are not available then \(\theta \) serves the dual role of corrective tax and revenue raising instrument. See Sandmo (1975) for an overview of environmental Ramsey taxation in a static setting.

  4. Brock (1977) models the gross flow of environmental waste, \(D^{g}(\tau )\), as a joint product and writes the macroeconomic production function (using our notation) as \(F(\Phi \left[ K(\tau ),D^{g}(\tau )\right] ,L(\tau ))\) where \(\Phi \left[ \cdot \right] \) is some aggregator function. This captures the idea that the production of one unit of output requires less capital if a more polluting technique is used (1977, p. 443). Our approach is consistent with his provided the aggregator function is of the Leontief type, i.e. \(\Phi \left[ \cdot \right] \equiv \min \left\{ K(\tau ),D^{g}(\tau )/\kappa \right\} \).

  5. In Sect. 4.2 below we postulate an alternative functional form for \(\Pi \left( P\right) \) consistent with Logistic Dynamics (LOG) and multiple environmental equilibria. We also compare the LOG and SLD cases there.

  6. An alternative mechanism by which pollution could affect labour supply operates via the health nexus. In that approach pollution leads to health problems and loss of labour productivity resulting in lower labour supply. In our model this health-based mechanism has been abstracted from.

  7. In terms of the graphical aparatus developed below, this condition implies that the CKE curve must be steeper than the PE locus at stable equilibrium points—see Fig. 1d.

  8. This \(\mu \)-value implies strong complementarity between leisure and environmental quality. In Subsect. 4.1 below we conduct a robustness analysis of the model by considering alternative values for \(\mu \).

  9. Reichling and Whalen (2010) survey the empirical literature and argue that studies based on micro-data typically find estimates for the Frisch elasticity in the range of 0.1 to more than 1. In contrast, the macro-based estimates usually fall in the range from 2 to 4. Interestingly, in the clean equilibrium of the unmanaged economy we find \(1/\xi _{L}=2.910\).

  10. Heijdra and Heijnen (2014) study optimal environmental policy in a model with exogenous labour supply. Their model is a special case of the model employed here—it is obtained by setting \(\varepsilon _{e}=1\), \(L(t)=1\), and dropping equation (T1.2). With exogenous labour supply the steady-state reduction of the capital stock is quite small.

References

  • Bovenberg, A. L., & Heijdra, B. J. (1998). Environmental tax policy and intergenerational distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 67, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. L., & Heijdra, B. J. (2002). Environmental abatement and intergenerational distribution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, 45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A. (1977). A polluted golden age. In V. L. Smith (Ed.), Economics of natural and environmental resources (pp. 441–461). New York: Gordon & Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A., & Starrett, D. (2003). Managing systems with non-convex positive feedback. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26, 575–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W., & Munro, G. R. (1975). The economics of fishing and modern capital theory: A simplified approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., & Kim, S. (2008). Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijdra, B. J., & Heijnen, P. (2013). Environmental abatement policy and the macroeconomy in the presence of ecological thresholds. Environmental and Resource Economics, 55, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijdra, B. J., & Heijnen, P. (2014). Optimal environmental policy in the presence of multiple equilibria and reversible hysteresis. In E. Moser, W. Semmler, G. Tragler, & V. M. Veliov (Eds.), Dynamic Optimization in Environmental Economics (pp. 61–85). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heijdra, B. J., Heijnen, P., & Kindermann, F. (2014). Optimal pollution taxation and abatement when leisure and environmental quality are complements: Mathematical appendix. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, November, http://www.heijdra.org/PimFab4MA.

  • Heijnen, P., & Wagener, F. O. O. (2013). Avoiding an ecological regime shift is sound economic policy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37, 1322–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, A., & Pecchenino, R. A. (1994). An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. Economic Journal, 104, 1393–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G., Xepapadeas, A., & de Zeeuw, A. (2003). The economics of shallow lakes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26, 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, P., & Rotillon, G. (1995). Disutility of pollution and endogenous growth. Environmental and Resource Economics, 6, 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R. (2001). Ecological thresholds: A survey. Ecological Economics, 38, 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (2008). A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieur, F. (2009). The environmental Kuznets curve in a world of irreversibility. Economic Theory, 40, 57–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaas, M. F., van Soest, D., & Baumgärtner, S. (2013). Complementarity, impatience, and the resilience of natural-resource-dependent economies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, R., & Shortle, J. (2007). The environmental Kutnets curve when the environment exhibits hysteresis. Ecological Economics, 64, 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichling, F., & Whalen, C. (2012). Review of estimates of the Frisch elasticity of labor supply. In Working paper 2012–13, Congressional Budget Office, Washington DC.

  • Sandmo, A. (1975). Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 77, 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J., & Repetto, R. (2000). Nonseparable utility and the double dividend debate: Reconsidering the tax-interaction effect. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M., & Starrett, D. (1975). Most rapid approach paths in accumulation problems. International Economic Review, 16, 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, F. (2009). Shallow lake economics run deep. In Discussion Paper TI 2009–033/1, Tinbergen Institute.

  • Wirl, F. (2004). Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution: Thresholds and cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28, 1149–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben J. Heijdra.

Additional information

A very preliminary draft of this paper was presented at the 12th Viennese Workshop on Optimal Control, Dynamic Games and Nonlinear Dynamics, held at the Vienna University of Technology in May-June 2012. We thank Jan van Ours, Laurie Reijnders as well as various conference and seminar participants for their useful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heijdra, B.J., Heijnen, P. & Kindermann, F. Optimal Pollution Taxation and Abatement When Leisure and Environmental Quality are Complements. De Economist 163, 95–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-014-9246-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-014-9246-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation