Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Early Childhood Creativity: Challenging Educators in Their Role to Intentionally Develop Creative Thinking in Children

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creativity is a topic of wide global interest, often discussed in fields such as education, psychology and business (Runco, Divergent thinking and creative potential, Hampton Press, New York, 2013; Yoruk and Runco, Journal for Neurocognitive Research 56:1–16, 2014). However, the relationship of pedagogical practices in early childhood education and care (ECEC) as it applies to the development of creative thought processes of young children is a relatively new area for investigation. This paper presents recent research that examines the role of the educator as an intentional teacher within Australian early learning environments and investigates the relationship of this role to children’s developing creativity. Theoretically informed by Vygotsky’s sociocultural constructivist approach (Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1930, 1978) and neo-Vygotskian theories on creativity (John-Steiner and Moran, Educational Psychologist 31:191–206, 2012), this paper explores some of the beliefs and understandings of educators on creativity. Furthermore, this paper exposes some of the misconceptions of educators about children’s creative thinking as they engage in play-based learning activities. The evidence from this Australian study suggests that the role of the educator is pivotal in assisting children in the early development of creative thinking thus challenging their role as educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. V. (1994). Creativity and play: A systematic approach to managing innovation. Business Horizons, 37, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aretoulakis, E. (2016). Forbidden aesthetics, ethical justice, and terror in modern western culture. London: Lexington books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudah, D. J. (2011). Conducting educational research: Guide to completing a major project. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, O., & Jordan, A. (2012). Approaches to creativity. A guide for teachers. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). The domain of creativity. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & H. Gardner (Eds.), Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity (pp. 135–158). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Key issues in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, J. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 228–229). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEEWR. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. ACT: Council of Australian Governments: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, L. (1999). What’s going on in there? How the brain and mind develop in the first five years of life. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDfEE. (2012). Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS). Department for Education and Employment. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/publicationDetail/Page.

  • Feist, G. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In R. Sternberg, E. Grigorenko & J. Singer (Eds.), Creativity from potential to realisation (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J., & Goh, B. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169–186). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2005). An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and the brain. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 143–168). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1993). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. New York: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A., Daubman, K., & Nowicki, G. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Moran, S. (2012). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. Oxford Scholarship Online. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.001.0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladkin, D. (2004). Action research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 536–548). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, N., & Ford, M. (2013). A fine balance: Understanding the roles educators and children play as intentional teachers and intentional learners within the Early Years Learning Framework. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, L. (2007). Asking questions of the Data: Memo writing in the Grounded Theory tradition. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 245–289). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Litjens, I., & Taguma, M. (2010). Revised literature overview for the 7th meeting of the network on early childhood education and care. from OECD EDU/EDPC/ECEC(2010)3/REV1.

  • Lubart, T. (1994). Creativity. In E. C. Carterette, M. P. Friedman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The handbook of perception and cognition (Vol. 12:Thinking and problem solving) (pp. 289–332). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malaguzzi, L. (1998). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children. The Reggio Emilia Approach-Advanced reflections (pp. 49–65). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, M., Mustard, F., & Shanker, S. (2007). Early years study 2: Putting science into action. Toronto, ON: Council for Early Childhood Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, C. (1996). Children’s rights in early education. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. Grigorenko & J. Singer (Eds.), Creativity from potential to realisation (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: process and way of life - Four key issues. In J. C. Kauffman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 189–215). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds. Learning to be creative. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodd, J. (1994). Leadership in early childhood education: The pathway to professionalism. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, M., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2006). Imaginary worldplay in childhood and maturity and its impact on adult creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 16, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (1990). Implicit theories and ideational creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 234–252). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (1999). Tension, adaptability and creativity. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience and psychological adjustment (pp. 165–194). Ann Arbor: Braun-Bumfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. (1999). Play, affect, and creativity: Theory and research. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affective, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (pp. 57–72). Philadelphia: Braun-Brumfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, J. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativty and development (pp. 12–60). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. (2006). Explaining creativity. The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Creativity and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1993). Foresight and insight: A Darwinian answer. In J. Brockman (Ed.), Creativity: The reality club (Vol. 4, pp. 465–494). New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2005). Birth to eight matters! Seeking seamlessness - continuity? Integration? Creativity? Paper presented at the TACTYC Annual conference, Cardiff.

  • Spriggs, M., & Gillam, L. (2008). Consent in paediatric research: An evaluation of the guidance provided in the 2007 NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Medical Journal of Australia, 188(6), 360–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesised. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4-5), 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanborn, P. (2010). Case study research: What, why and how? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K. (2010). Quality in early childhood settings. In K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford, & B. Taggart (Eds.), Early childhood matters: Evidence from the Effective Pre-School and Primary Education project (pp. 149–165). Abington, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Benesville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. (2004). Assessing creativity:The test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). The concept, application, evaluation, and International studies. Psychology Science, 46(3), 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1930, 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wallach, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W. (1968). Creativity in young children. Society for Research in Child Development, 39(3), 737–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (2006). Expertise and reasons in creative thinking. In J. C. Kauffman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 7–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoruk, S., & Runco, M. (2014). The neuroscience of divergent thinking. Activitas Nervosa Superior: Journal for Neurocognitive Research, 56(1–2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Newcastle, PO Box 127, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia

    Nicole Leggett

Authors
  1. Nicole Leggett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Leggett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leggett, N. Early Childhood Creativity: Challenging Educators in Their Role to Intentionally Develop Creative Thinking in Children. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 845–853 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0836-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0836-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation