Adams, S. M., Baldwin, J., Comingore, J. L., & Smith, D. J. (2006). Emergent curriculum? Standards-based? Project Approach? Authentic assessment?: Making all the pieces fit for a developmentally appropriate approach to curriculum and assessment. Dayton’s Young Child,
Anderson, K. L., Martin, D. M., & Faszewski, E. E. (2006). Unlocking the power of observations. Science and Children,
Bagnato, S. J. (2005). The authentic alternative for assessment in early intervention: An emerging evidence-based practice. Journal of Early Intervention,
(1), 17–22. doi:10.1177/105381510502800102
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Clifford, R. M., Barbarin, O., Chang, F., Early, D., Bryant, D., Howes, C., et al. (2005). What is pre-kindergarten? Characteristics of public pre-kindergarten programs. Applied Developmental Science,
(3), 126–143. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0903_1
Dueschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Epstein, A. S., Schweinhart, L. J., & McAdoo, L. (1996). Models of early childhood education. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Espinosa, L. (2002). High quality preschool: Why we need it and what it looks like. NIEER Policy Briefs 1
Freeman, N., & Brown, M. (2008). An authentic approach to assessing pre-kindergarten programs. Childhood Education,
Hatch, J. A., & Grieshaber, S. (2002). Child observation and accountability in early childhood education: Perspectives from Australia and the United States. Early Childhood Education Journal,
(4), 227–231. doi:10.1023/A:1015177406713
Katz, L., & Chard, S. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.
NAEYC & NAECS/SDE. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8 [Joint position statement]. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). Practitioner review: The role of direct observation in the assessment of young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
(7), 861–869. doi:10.1017/S002196300100765X
Peterson, S. M., & French, L. (2008). Supporting young children’s explanations through inquiry science in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,
(3), 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.01.003
Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., Clifford, R. M., Early, D., et al. (2005). Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child–teacher interactions? Applied Developmental Science,
(3), 144–159. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0903_2
Raspa, M. J., McWilliam, R. A., & Ridley, S. M. (2001). Child care quality and children’s engagement. Early Education and Development,
, 209–224. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1202_3
Ravanis, K., & Pantidos, P. (2008). Science activities in preschool education: Effective and ineffective activities in a Piagetian theoretical framework for research and development. International Journal of Learning,
Ryan, S. (2008). Action or reaction: Reflecting on Sally Lubeck’s wisdom to reinvent the field of early education. Journal of Early Childhood Research,
, 69–74. doi:10.1177/1476718X07086602
Winter, S. M., & Kelley, M. F. (2008). Forty years of school readiness research: What have we learned? Childhood Education,
Zales, C. R., & Unger, C. S. (2008). The science and literacy framework. Science and Children,