Abstract
We adapt the standard random utility model to take account of the heterogeneity of recreational preferences by using what we call a “skilled-based conditional logit framework”. By separating out our sample of whitewater kayakers into two exogenously identifiable groups (based on their skill level) and running separate conditional logits for each group we are able to take account of the fact that kayakers of different skill levels are looking for different characteristics from the whitewater site they choose to visit. We find that not taking into account the differences in the skill of the kayakers and the grade of the river will result in an overestimation of the welfare estimates associated with improvements to lower grade whitewater sites (which are frequented by basic/intermediated proficiency level kayakers) and underestimating welfare estimates associated with changes in the attributes of higher grade whitewater sites (which are frequented by advanced proficiency level kayakers).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowicz W. (1994) Habit Formation and Variety Seeking in a Discrete Choice Model of Recreation Demand. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(1):19–31
Adamowicz W., Swait J., Boxall P., Louviere J., Williams M. (1997) Perceptions Versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32:65–84
Becker G., Murphy K. (1988) A Theory of Rational Addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96(4):675–700
Davidson P., Adams F., Seneca J. (1966) The Social Value of Water Recreational Facilities Resulting from an Improvement in Water Quality: The Delaware Estuary. In: Kneese A, Smith S. (eds). Water Research. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Hanemann, W. (1984), ‚Welfare Analysis with Discrete Choice Models’, Working Paper, Dep. of Agricultural and Resource Economics. University of California, Berkeley
Hanley N., Koop G., Alvarez-Farizo B., Wright R., Nevin C. (2001) Go Climb a Mountain: an Application of Recreation Demand Modelling to Rock Climbing in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics 52:36–52
Hanley N., Alvarez-Farizo B., Shaw D. (2002) Rationing an Open-access Resource: Mountaineering in Scotland. Land Use Policy 19:167–176
Hanley N, Bell D., Alvarez-Farizo B (2003) Valuing the Benefits of Coastal Water Quality Improvements Using Contingent and Real Behaviour. Environmental and Resource Economics 24(3):273–285
Hynes, S., N. Hanley and C. O’ Donoghue (2004), ‚Measuring the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Modelling: an Application to a Random Utility Model Of Whitewater Kayaking in Ireland’, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 87, National University of Ireland, Galway
MacGearailt, S. (1996), Irish Whitewater – A Guide to Irish Whitewater Rivers and Surf, Dublin: Fontwork Graphics Publishers
McConnell K., I. Strand N. Bockstael, (1990), Habit Formation and the Demand for Recreation: Issues and a Case Study, in A. N. Link, V. Kerry Smith, eds, Advances in Applied Micro Economics, vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
McConnell, K. and I. Strand (1994), ‚The Economic Value of Mid and South Atlantic Sportfishing’, University of Maryland, Report to the USEPA and NOAA
McFadden D., (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. In: Zarembka P. (ed) Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York
Morey E. (1981) The Demand for Site-specific Recreational Activities: a Characteristics Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:345–371
Morey, E., W. Breffle, R. Rowe and D. Waldman (2003), ‚Estimating Recreational Trout Fishing Damages in Montana’s Clarke River Basin: Summary of a Natural Resource Damage Assessment’, in N. Hanley, D. Shaw and R. Wright, eds., The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd
Munley V., Smith V. (1976) Learning-by-Doing and Experience: the Case of Whitewater Recreation. Land Economics 52(4):545–553
Parsons, G. and M. Massey (2003), ‚A RUM Model of Beach Recreation’ in N. Hanley, D. Shaw and R. Wright, eds., The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd
Provencher B., Bishop R. (2004) Does Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity Improve the Forecasting of a Random Utility Model? A Case Study Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48:793–810
Siderelis C., Brothers G., Rea P. (1995) A Boating Choice Model for the Valuation of Lake Access. Journal of Leisure Research 27(3):264–282
Shaw, D. and P. Jakus (1996), ‚Travel Cost Models of the Demand for Rock Climbing’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25, 133–142
Smith, K. (1997), ‚Time and the Valuation of Environmental Resources’, Duke Economics Working Paper No: 97–36
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to participants at the Environmental, Energy and Natural Resource Economics Policy Symposium, Galway for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper; and to two referees and the editor for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hynes, S., Hanley, N. & Garvey, E. Up the Proverbial Creek without a Paddle: Accounting for Variable Participant Skill Levels in Recreational Demand Modelling. Environ Resource Econ 36, 413–426 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9035-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9035-x