Climate Policy under Technology Spillovers Article Accepted: 11 January 2004 DOI:
Cite this article as: Golombek, R. & Hoel, M. Environ Resource Econ (2005) 31: 201. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-1771-9 Abstract
We study climate policy when there are technology spillovers between countries, as there is no instrument that (directly) corrects for these externalities. Without an international climate agreement, the (non-cooperative) equilibrium depends on whether countries use tradable quotas or carbon taxes as their environmental policy instruments. All countries are better-off in the tax case than in the quota case. Two types of international climate agreements are then studied: One is a Kyoto type of agreement where each country is assigned a specific number of internationally tradable quotas. In the second type of agreement, a common carbon tax is used domestically in all countries. None of the cases satisfy the conditions for the social optimum. Even if the quota price is equal to the Pigovian level, R&D investments will be lower than what is socially optimal in the quota case. It is also argued that the quota agreement gives higher R&D expenditures and more abatement than the tax agreement.
Keywords climate policy international environmental agreements R&D technology spillovers JEL classifications O30 H23 Q20 Q28 Q48 References Buonanno, B., Carraro, C., Castelnuovo, E., Galeotti, M. 2000 ‘Efficiency and Equity of Emission Trading with Endogenous Environmental Technical Change’ Carraro, C. eds. Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht Google Scholar Buonanno, B., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M. 2003 ‘Endogenous Induced Technical Change and the Costs of Kyoto’ Resource and Energy Economics 25 11 34 CrossRef Google Scholar Carraro, C. 1998 ‘Climate Modelling and Policy Strategies. The Role of Technological Change and Uncertainty’ Energy Economics 20 463 471 CrossRef Google Scholar
Fischer, C. (2000), ‘Climate Change Policy Choices and Technological Innovation’, Resources for the Future,
Climate Issue Brief 20
Golombek, R. and M. Hoel (2003), ‘Climate Policy under Technology Spillovers’, Memorandum from Department of Economics, University of Oslo, 22/2003.
Goulder, L. H., Mathai, K. 2000 ‘Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 1 38 CrossRef Google Scholar Goulder, L. H., Schneider, S. 1999 ‘Induced Technological Change, Crowding out, and the Attractiveness of CO 2 Emissions Abatement’ Resource and Environmental Economics 21 211 253 CrossRef Google Scholar Hoel, M. 1992 ‘Carbon Taxes: An International Tax or Harmonized Domestic Taxes?’ European Economic Review 36 400 406 CrossRef Google Scholar Hoel, M. 1993 ‘Harmonization of Carbon Taxes in International Climate Agreements’ Environmental and Resource Economics 3 221 232 CrossRef Google Scholar
Jaffe, B., G.Newell, and R. Stavins (2002), ‘Environmental Policy and Technological Change’.
Environmental and Resource Economics
22 (special issue), 41–69 Katsoulacos, Y. 1997 ‘R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Subsidies and International Agreements’ Carraro, C. eds. International Environmental Negotiations. Strategic Policy Issues Edward Elgar Cheltenham Google Scholar Keller, W. 2002 ‘Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion’ American Economic Review 92 120 142 CrossRef Google Scholar Löschel, A. 2002 ‘Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey’ Ecological Economics 43 105 126 CrossRef Google Scholar Millock, K. 2002 ‘Technology Transfers in the Clean Development Mechanism: An Incentive Issue’ Environment and Development Economics 7 449 466 CrossRef Google Scholar Nordhaus, W. D. 2000‘Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy’ Yale University Mimeo Google Scholar Ploeg, F., Zeeuw, A. 1994 ‘Investment in Clean Technology and Transboundary Pollution Control’ Carraro, C. eds. Trade, Innovation, Environment Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht Google Scholar Rasmussen, T. N. 2001 ‘CO 2 Abatement Policy with Learning-by-doing in Renewable Energy’ Resource and Energy Economics 23 297 325 CrossRef Google Scholar Rivera-Batiz, L., Romer, P. 1991 ‘Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 531 555 CrossRef Google Scholar
Rosendahl, K. E. (2002), ‘Cost-effective Environmental Policy: Implications of Induced Technological Change’, Statistics Norway, Discussion Paper No. 314.
Westskog, H. 1996 ‘Market Power in a System of Tradable CO quotas’ The Energy Journal 17 85 103 Google Scholar Xepapadeas, A. 1995 ‘Induced Technical Change and International Agreements under Greenhouse Warming’ Resource and Energy Economics 17 1 23 CrossRef Google Scholar