Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the potential of teacher-designed technology-based tasks for meaningful learning: Identifying needs for professional development

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With technology increasingly being introduced into classrooms worldwide, stakeholders are asking whether ICT provides educational value. It is not simply having access to technology but how teachers use it that will determine its worth to education. Thirty-three teacher-designed technology-based tasks from eight subject areas were analysed for their effective use of ICT, and their potential to involve students in constructivist learning. Few of the tasks made effective use of ICT for meaningful learning, for reasons associated with teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and missing TPACK components or competencies. These factors provide the basis for a model of areas to target when structuring professional development courses to help teachers better utilize educational ICT to design meaningful learning tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuna, J., & Lareki, A. (2015). Analysis of the use of digital technologies in schools that implement different learning theories. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, L. (2007). Comparison of teacher educators’ instructional methods with the constructivist ideal. The Teacher Educator, 42(3), 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, N. (2016). Technology and teacher education: A brief glimpse of the research and practice that have shaped the field. TechTrends, 60(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39, 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).

  • Bishop, K., & Denley, P. (2007). Learning science teaching: Developing a professional knowledge base. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M., & Elen, J. (2014). Emerging technologies. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 673–674). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F. (2016). Curricular development and ICT: From technological deficit to methodological deficit. In A. Moreira, A. Szucs, & I. Mázár (Eds), Proceedings of the European Distance and E-learning Network annual conference. Re-imaging learning environments (pp. 435–447). Budapest: European Distance and E-learning Network.

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43–62). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, S., Anderson, R., & Becker, H. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2016). Online collaborative mentoring for technology integration in pre-service teacher education. TechTrends, 60(1), 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, R. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Seattle Washington: Collaborative impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, B., & Hashemi, M. (2011). ICT: New wave in English language learning/teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3098–3102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Jones, C., & Thompson, K. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Instructional approaches, group processes and educational designs. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 439–451). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B., Miller, R., Crowson, H., Duke, B., & Akey, K. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greener, S., & Wakefield, C. (2015). Developing confidence in the use of digital tools in teaching. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 260–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamat, A., & Embi, M. (2010). Constructivism in the design of online learning tools. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, T. (2014). Uptake and use of technology: Bridging design for teaching and learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haydn, T., & Barton, R. (2007). Common needs and different agendas: How trainee teachers make progress in their ability to use ICT in subject teaching. Some lessons from the UK. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1018–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 401–412). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K., & Cheung, W. (2013). Use of web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinostroza, J., Ibieta, A., Claro, M., & Labbé, C. (2016). Characterisation of teachers’ use of computers and internet inside and outside the classroom: The need to focus on the quality. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1595–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P.-S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Chiu, P., Liu, T., & Chen, T. (2011). The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2291–2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–811). London: Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, M. (2013). Mapping out the ICT integration terrain in the school context: Identifying the challenges in an innovative project. Irish Educational Studies, 32(3), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1535–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, U., & Goh, D. (2014). Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers’ attitudes toward teaching with web 2.0. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, J., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, G., Cornelius, P., Sachs, J., & Schwab, K. (2002). The global information technology report 2001–2002: Readiness for the networked world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J., & Chai, C. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 102, 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tay, L. (2014a). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tsai, C. (2014b). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1083–1096). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J., & Sharma, P. (2009). One laptop per child: vision vs. reality. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W., & Plomp, T. (Eds.) (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC Studies in Comparative Education 23.

  • Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Education Technology and Research Development, 64, 707–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., & Chai, C. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: The journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers & Education, 71, 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R., & Scrimshaw, P. (2001). Information and communication technology, knowledge and pedagogy. Education, Communication & Information, 1(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Education Technology Plan. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education.

  • Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Y., & Lau, S. (2010). Differential relations of constructivist and didactic instruction to students’ cognition, motivation, and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, M., & McPherson, M. (2007). Why designers cannot be agnostic about pedagogy: The influence of constructivist thinking in design of e-learning for HE. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 62, 7–30.

  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. PISA: OECD Publishing.

  • Öman, A., & Svensson, L. (2015). Similar products different processes: Exploring the orchestration of digital resources in a primary school project. Computers & Education, 81, 247–258.

  • Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab series. Report 6.

  • Paquette, G. (2014). Technology-based instructional design: Evolution and major trends. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 661–671). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peeraer, J., & van Petegem, P. (2012). Measuring integration of information and communication technology in education: An item response modeling approach. Computers & Education, 58, 1247–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58, 1351–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (trans: Cook, M.). New York: Basic books.

  • Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M., & George, A. (2017). Viewing the changing world of educational technology from a different perspective: Present realities, past lessons, and future possibilities. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9604-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C., Bolliger, D., Dousay, T., & Persichitte, K. (2016). Preparing teachers for online instruction with a graduate certificate program. TechTrends, 60(1), 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 5(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallvid, M. (2016). Understanding teachers’ reluctance to the pedagogical use of ICT in the 1:1 classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, (34)18, 2875-2905.

  • Ward, L., & Parr, J. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S., Lee, J., & Najmi, A. (2014). The impact of technology and theory of instructional design since 2000. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 89–99). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Rethinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. (2005). Has ICT come of age? Recurring debates on the role of ICT in education, 1982–2004. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, M., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, J., Dickerson, J., Weaver, C., & Josey, F. (2016). Iterative and event-based frameworks for university and school district technology professional development partnerships. TechTrends, 60(1), 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zint, M. (2002). Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers’ intentions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 819–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann George.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

George, A., Sanders, M. Evaluating the potential of teacher-designed technology-based tasks for meaningful learning: Identifying needs for professional development. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2871–2895 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9609-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9609-y

Keywords

Navigation