Skip to main content
Log in

Smart phones permitted: How teachers use text messaging to collaborate

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of smart phones by teachers in K-12 education has been contentious. Although teachers are often instructed to put their phones away during instruction, teachers and students can benefit in many ways from using smart phones in the classroom. The use of information systems such as a smart phone can support knowledge sharing and collaboration opportunities not otherwise available. For example, teachers may use smart phones to collaborate with other teachers, paraprofessionals, related service providers, and parents when face-to-face time is not available. This exploratory pilot study included semi-structured interviews of five teachers at an inclusive school to investigate how smart phones were used to collaborate. Results suggest that teachers used text messaging on a regular basis to work together to make modifications, communicate about student behavior, share student work, and to review student progress regarding goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In our study we refer to smart phones instead of cell phones because smart phones have features such as video and email that may be important in information sharing. However, some research used as the basis for this study uses the term “cell phone.” Thus, we use “cell phone” when referring to such research.

  2. An Individualized Education Program is a document required for students with disabilities receiving supports and services in schools in the United States. The document outlines parameters of supports and services, as well as academic and social goals for the student.

References

  • Banister, S. (2010). Integrating the iPod Touch in K-12 education: visions and vices. Computersin the Schools, 27(2), 121–131. doi:10.1080/07380561003801590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, C. B., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, K. (2012). Teachers texting students: Should schools ban or encourage. Retrieved on June 12, 2012 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/16/teachers-texting- students_n_1427418.html

  • Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teacher’s adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. (2001). Grounded theory in ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, D. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. H. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 160–174). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Canole, G., Galley, R., & Culver, J. (2011). Frameworks for understanding the nature of interactions, networking, and community in a social networking site for academic practice. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning., 12(3), 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., & Friend, M. (2010). The state of the art of collaboration on behalf of students with disabilities. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, P. (2008). Creativity, wisdom and trusteeship—niches of cultural production. In A. Craft, H. Gardner, & C. Claxton (Eds.), Creativity and wisdom in education (pp. 105–108). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. E. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical framework for the use of technology in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 31(1), 71–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earp, J., Ott, M., & Pozzi, F. (2013). Facilitating educators’ knowledge sharing with dedicated Information Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G., & Pohio, K. (2010). Deliberate acts of virtual communication: cellphones as a toolto enhance student learning and engagement. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 3(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortner, R. (2010). Cell phones are ringing, will educators hear. Academic Leadership, 8(3), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, P., & Rose, S. (2007). The Influence of technocentric collaboration on preservice teachers’ attitudes about technology’s role in powerful learning and teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karami, M., Karami, Z., & Attaran, M. (2013). Integrating problem-based learning with ICT for developing trainee teacher’ content knowledge and teaching skill. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., Orthober, C. & Schultz, N. (2009). Using Text-Messaging in the Secondary Classroom. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 2159–2164). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/30943.

  • Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Australian Educational Computing, 27(1), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtonen, T., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Dillon, P., & Vesisenaho, M. (2011). Facilitating collaboration in lecture-based learning through shared notes using wireless technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 575–586. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00420.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesisenaho, M., & Dillon, P. (2013). Localising and contextualising information and communication technology in education: a cultural ecological framework. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(2), 239–259. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.759130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Creating an inclusive school (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, R., Thousand, J., & Nevin, A. (2008). A guide to co-teaching: Practical tips for facilitating student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, R., & Thousand, J. (2009). Making inclusive education work. In K. Ryan & J. M. Cooper (Eds.), Kaleidoscope: Contemporary and classic readings in education. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D., & Modla, V. (2012). Using wikis with teacher candidates: promoting collaborative practice and contextual analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. K., McPherson, S., & Hsu, H. Y. (2008). Information and communication technologies to develop teachers’ global awareness. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 4(2), 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan Cosier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cosier, M., Gomez, A., McKee, A. et al. Smart phones permitted: How teachers use text messaging to collaborate. Educ Inf Technol 20, 347–358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9288-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9288-2

Keywords

Navigation