Abstract
There has been much concern with the ideas of interactive and dialogic teaching during recent years in the UK, ideas which have emerged from international comparisons. This paper concerns a research project in Wales which sought to explore how the interactive features of information and communication technology (ICT) support interactivity in teaching. The project found that much use of ICT by good teachers was at a relatively superficial level of interaction, yet when teachers used a deeper, more dialogic, level of interactivity in teaching, they achieved improvements in learning whether they used ICT or not. The potential of ICT to support more dialogic teaching was not being fully exploited. The paper reports the findings of the classroom observation dimension of the project, and examines the implications for pedagogical practices and the development/dissemination of ICT resources which can support more dialogic interactivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. (2004). Dialogic teaching. York: Dialogos.
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools—towards an effective transition framework. Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 327–348. doi:10.1080/14759390400200186.
Beauchamp, G. (2006). New technologies and ‘new teaching’: a process of evolution. In R. Webb (Ed.), Changing teaching and learning in the primary school. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Becta (2003). Primary schools—ICT and standards. An analysis of national data from ofsted and QCA. Coventry: Becta.
Birnbaum, I. (1990). The assessment of IT capability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 6, 88–97. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1990.tb00352.x.
Cox, M. J. (1997). The effects of information technology on students’ motivation. Coventry: Council for Educational Technology.
Cox, M. J., & Abbott, C. (Eds.). (2004). A review of the research literature relating to ICT and attainment. Coventry: Becta/London: DfES.
Cox, M. J., & Webb, M. (Eds.). (2004). A review of the research literature relating to ICT and pedagogy. Coventry: Becta/London: DfES.
DfES (TTA) (1998). The use of ICT in subject teaching. Expected outcomes for teachers in England, Northern Ireland and Wales. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257–278.
Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H., et al. (2005). Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies: Final Report. Newcastle: Newcastle University.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2003). The influence of a technology-rich classroom environment on elementary teachers’ pedagogy and children’s learning. In J. Wright, A. McDougall, J. Murnane, & J. Lowe (Eds.), Young children and learning technologies pp. 65–70. Sydney: Australian Computer Society.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227–241.
Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61–73.
Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Beauchamp, G., Parkinson, J., Jones, S., Norman, N., et al. (2007). The use of ICT to improve learning and attainment through interactive teaching: Final Report to the ESRC. Swansea: Swansea Metropolitan University.
Mercer, N., Littleton, K., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational activities. Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 193–209. doi:10.1080/14759390400200180.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaãiç, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) project: London challenge DfES research report 816. London: DfES.
Moyles, J., Hargreaves, L., Merry, R., Paterson, F., & Esartes-Sarries, V. (2003). Interactive teaching in the primary school: Digging deeper into meaning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Plowman, L. (2005). Getting the story straight: the role of narrative in teaching and learning with interactive media. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education and communication technology (pp. 55–76).
Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: a fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605–631. doi:10.1002/sce.20131.
Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x.
Somekh, B., et al. (2007). Evaluation of the primary schools whiteboard expansion project: Report to the department for education and skills. Manchester: MMU.
Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2007). Using video-stimulated reflective dialogue to learn from children about their learning with and without ICT technology. Pedagogy and Education, 16(3), 321–335. doi:10.1080/14759390701614454.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of other project team members—Howard Tanner, Sonia Jones, Lynne Meiring, Nigel Norman, John Parkinson and Gerran Thomas—who carried out much of the analysis reported here. The project was carried out with funding from the Economic and Social Research Council, grant number RES-139-25-0167
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beauchamp, G., Kennewell, S. The influence of ICT on the interactivity of teaching. Educ Inf Technol 13, 305–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9071-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9071-y