Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychosocial Impact of Lynch Syndrome on Affected Individuals and Families

  • Review
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, conferring a heightened risk not only of colon cancer but also of various extracolonic tumors. Studies in hereditary breast cancer have shown a negative psychological impact for patients testing positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, but there is a paucity of literature looking at psychosocial impact of LS testing for probands and families.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed English-language articles was performed using the keywords “Lynch syndrome” combined with “psychological impact,” “depression,” and “anxiety.”

Results

Lynch syndrome mutation carriers, whether or not they have had cancer, suffer a transient increase in depression and anxiety scores post-disclosure, which seem to normalize by 6–12 months. Younger patients with higher colorectal cancer risk perception, higher education level, married, and employed are more likely to accept genetic testing. Major motivators for testing are predicting one’s own risk of cancer and risk to offspring. Carrier status influences family planning, and there is growing interest for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Conclusions

Psychosocial ramifications of LS mutation positivity need to be explored further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwan EL, Chung DC. Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: an overview. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2007;6:340–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A. Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:919–932.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch HT, Lemon SJ, Durham C, Tinley ST, et al. A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results. Cancer. 1997;79:2219–2228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet. 2001;98:15–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lynch HT, Snyder C, Lynch JF, Karatoprakli P, et al. Patient responses to the disclosure of BRCA mutation tests in hereditary breast–ovarian cancer families. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;165:91–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Codori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL, Larkin EK, et al. Attitudes towards colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:345–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerman C, Hughes C, Trock BJ, Myers RE, et al. Genetic testing in families with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. JAMA. 1999;281:1618–1622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aktan-Collan K, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Nystrom-Lahti M, et al. Predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: uptake and long-term satisfaction. Int J Cancer. 2000;89:44–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aktan-Collan K, Haukkala A, Mecklin JP, Uutela A, Kaariainen H. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a perspective follow-up study. Int J Cancer. 2001;93:608–611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aktan-Collan K, Kaariainen H, Jarvinen H, Peltomaki P, et al. Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study. Fam Cancer. 2013;12:639–646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gritz ER, Peterson SK, Vernon SW, Marani SK, et al. Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1902–1910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meiser B, Collins V, Warren R, Gaff C, et al. Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Clin Genet. 2004;66:502–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins VR, Meiser B, Ukoumunne OC, Gaff C, et al. The impact of predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: three years after testing. Genet Med. 2007;9:290–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Claes E, Denayer L, Evers-Kiebooms G, Boogaerts A, et al. Predictive testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: subjective perception regarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress, and health-related behavior a one year post-test. Genet Test. 2005;9:54–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, Yoshida T, et al. Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101:395–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carlsson C, Nilbert M. Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: experiences from and impact of genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2007;16:811–820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Esplen MJ, Wong J, Aronson M, Butler K, et al. Long-term psychosocial and behavioral adjustment in individuals receiving genetic test results in Lynch syndrome. Clin Genet. 2014. doi:10.1111/cge.12509.

  18. Esplen MJ, Madlensky L, Aronson M, Rothenmund H, et al. Colorectal cancer survivors undergoing testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivational factors and psychosocial functioning. Clin Genet. 2007;72:394–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brodersen NH, Sutton S, Goff S, Hodgson SV, Thomas HJW. Anticipated reactions to genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet. 2004;66:437–444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Esplen MJ, Madlensky L, Butler K, McKinnon W, et al. Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. Am J Med Genet. 2001;103:9–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Balmana J, Stoffel EM, Emmons KM, Garber JE, Syngal S. Comparison of motivations and concerns for genetic testing in hereditary colorectal and breast cancer syndromes. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartuma K, Nilbert M, Carlsson C. Family perspectives in Lynch syndrome becoming a family risk, patterns of communication and influence on relations. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2012;10:6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen SA, Leininger A. The genetic basis of Lynch syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management. Appl Clin Genet. 2014;22:147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dewanwala A, Chittenden A, Rosenblatt M, Mercado R, et al. Attitudes towards childbearing and prenatal testing in individuals undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer. 2011;10:549–556.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rich TA, Liu M, Etzel CJ, Bannon SA, et al. Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Fam Cancer. 2014;13:291–299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seppen J, Bruzzone L. Lynch syndrome: the patient’s perspective. Fam Cancer. 2013;12:341–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Green RC, Lautenbach D, McGuire AL. GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:397–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Keller M, Jost R, Haunstetter CM, Sattel H, et al. Psychosocial outcome following genetic risk counselling for familial colorectal cancer: a comparison of affected patients and family members. Clin Genet. 2008;74:414–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Heidi Rothenmund was supported by funds from the Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consortium (Terry Fox Research Institute).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Polymnia Galiatsatos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galiatsatos, P., Rothenmund, H., Aubin, S. et al. Psychosocial Impact of Lynch Syndrome on Affected Individuals and Families. Dig Dis Sci 60, 2246–2250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3626-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3626-8

Keywords

Navigation