Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy: Are We Achieving Polyp Clearance?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Study Aim

Currently colonoscopy quality indicators emphasize our ability to improve polyp detection (e.g., preparation quality, withdrawal times of ≥6 min). The completeness of a polyp resection may also be an important determinant of quality and efficient colonoscopy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incidence of an incomplete polyp resection despite a perceived complete polypectomy.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective quality assurance project conducted at the San Diego Veterans Affair Medical Center and University of California San Diego Medical Center from July 2007 to April 2008. The patients recruited to this study were undergoing surveillance and screening colonoscopy. The resection quality was evaluated in 65 polyps of 47 patients. Twenty-two polyps were removed with standard biopsy forceps, jumbo forceps (18), hot snare (18), and cold snare (7). Biopsies were taken from the post-polypectomy site base and perimeter for histologic examination in order to confirm histologic absence of all polypoid appearing mucosa.

Results

The post-polypectomy sites of ten polyps (15 %) were found to have residual polypoid tissue. Six were removed by standard biopsy forceps, jumbo forceps (2), hot snare (1), and cold snare (1). When compared to other polypectomy devices, standard biopsy forceps were more likely to result in an incomplete resection (27 vs. 9 %; P = 0.076).

Conclusions

The endoscopist may not be visually accurate in determining when a polyp is completely resected, and alternative devices and techniques for polyp resection should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caputi BO, Ugenti I, Martines G, et al. Endoscopic management of large colorectal polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:749–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:33–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:873–885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sung HY, Cheung DY, Cho SH, et al. Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps and resected specimens. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:190–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:414–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kimmey MB, Silverstein FE, Saunders DR, Haggitt RC. Endoscopic bipolar forceps: a potential treatment for the diminutive polyp. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:38–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanagunas A, Jacob P, Vakil N. Adequacy of “hot biopsy” for the treatment of diminutive polyps: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84:383–385.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Efthymiou M, Taylor ACF, Desmond PV, et al. Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2011;43:312–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woods A, Sanowski RA, Wadas DD, et al. Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35:536–540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Binmoeller KF, Bohnacker S, Seifert H, et al. Endoscopic snare excision of “giant” colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:183–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monkemuller K, Neumann H, Malfertheiner P, Fry LC. Advanced colon polypectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:641–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McAfee JH, Katon RM. Tiny snares prove safe and effective for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:301–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rex DK. Colonoscopic polypectomy. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2005;5:115–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tappero G, Gaia E, De Giuli P, et al. Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:310–313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1259–1264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:385–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deenadayalu VP, Rex DK. Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:253–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dana Riley and Rohit Loomba, MD for the assistance in the preparation and review of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Mary Lee Krinsky has received an unrestricted educational grant from Spectrascience at the time of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Lee Krinsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, S., Ho, S.B. & Krinsky, M.L. Quality of Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy: Are We Achieving Polyp Clearance?. Dig Dis Sci 57, 1786–1791 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2115-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2115-6

Keywords

Navigation