Quality of Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy: Are We Achieving Polyp Clearance?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Background and Study Aim
Currently colonoscopy quality indicators emphasize our ability to improve polyp detection (e.g., preparation quality, withdrawal times of ≥6 min). The completeness of a polyp resection may also be an important determinant of quality and efficient colonoscopy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incidence of an incomplete polyp resection despite a perceived complete polypectomy.
Patients and Methods
This was a retrospective quality assurance project conducted at the San Diego Veterans Affair Medical Center and University of California San Diego Medical Center from July 2007 to April 2008. The patients recruited to this study were undergoing surveillance and screening colonoscopy. The resection quality was evaluated in 65 polyps of 47 patients. Twenty-two polyps were removed with standard biopsy forceps, jumbo forceps (18), hot snare (18), and cold snare (7). Biopsies were taken from the post-polypectomy site base and perimeter for histologic examination in order to confirm histologic absence of all polypoid appearing mucosa.
The post-polypectomy sites of ten polyps (15 %) were found to have residual polypoid tissue. Six were removed by standard biopsy forceps, jumbo forceps (2), hot snare (1), and cold snare (1). When compared to other polypectomy devices, standard biopsy forceps were more likely to result in an incomplete resection (27 vs. 9 %; P = 0.076).
The endoscopist may not be visually accurate in determining when a polyp is completely resected, and alternative devices and techniques for polyp resection should be considered.
- Caputi, BO, Ugenti, I, Martines, G (2009) Endoscopic management of large colorectal polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis 24: pp. 749-753 CrossRef
- Levin, B, Lieberman, DA, McFarland, B (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58: pp. 130-160 CrossRef
- Rex, DK (2000) Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51: pp. 33-36 CrossRef
- Harewood, GC, Sharma, VK, Garmo, P (2003) Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58: pp. 76-79 CrossRef
- Rex, DK, Petrini, JL, Baron, TH (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101: pp. 873-885
- Barclay, RL, Vicari, JJ, Doughty, AS (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355: pp. 2533-2541 CrossRef
- Lai, EJ, Calderwood, AH, Doros, G (2009) The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 69: pp. 620-625 CrossRef
- Sung, HY, Cheung, DY, Cho, SH (2009) Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps and resected specimens. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21: pp. 190-195 CrossRef
- Singh, N, Harrison, M, Rex, DK (2004) A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 60: pp. 414-418 CrossRef
- Kimmey, MB, Silverstein, FE, Saunders, DR, Haggitt, RC (1988) Endoscopic bipolar forceps: a potential treatment for the diminutive polyp. Gastrointest Endosc 34: pp. 38-41 CrossRef
- Vanagunas, A, Jacob, P, Vakil, N (1989) Adequacy of “hot biopsy” for the treatment of diminutive polyps: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol 84: pp. 383-385
- Efthymiou, M, Taylor, ACF, Desmond, PV (2011) Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy 43: pp. 312-316 CrossRef
- Woods, A, Sanowski, RA, Wadas, DD (1989) Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal. Gastrointest Endosc 35: pp. 536-540 CrossRef
- Binmoeller, KF, Bohnacker, S, Seifert, H (1996) Endoscopic snare excision of “giant” colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 43: pp. 183-188 CrossRef
- Rijn, JC, Reitsma, JB, Stoker, J (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101: pp. 343-350 CrossRef
- Rex, DK, Cutler, CS, Lemmel, GT (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112: pp. 24-28 CrossRef
- Monkemuller, K, Neumann, H, Malfertheiner, P, Fry, LC (2009) Advanced colon polypectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: pp. 641-652 CrossRef
- McAfee, JH, Katon, RM (1994) Tiny snares prove safe and effective for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 40: pp. 301-303 CrossRef
- Rex, DK (2005) Colonoscopic polypectomy. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 5: pp. 115-125
- Tappero, G, Gaia, E, Giuli, P (1992) Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 38: pp. 310-313 CrossRef
- Farrar, WD, Sawhney, MS, Nelson, DB (2006) Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4: pp. 1259-1264 CrossRef
- Robertson, DJ, Greenberg, ER, Beach, M (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129: pp. 34-41 CrossRef
- Pabby, A, Schoen, RE, Weissfeld, JL (2005) Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 61: pp. 385-391 CrossRef
- Deenadayalu, VP, Rex, DK (2005) Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc 62: pp. 253-256 CrossRef
- Quality of Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy: Are We Achieving Polyp Clearance?
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume 57, Issue 7 , pp 1786-1791
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Colorectal neoplasia
- Colon cancer screening
- Biopsy forcep
- Industry Sectors