How Can the Over-Use of Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy Be Modified?
It is evident that colorectal cancer screening programs have contributed to a decrease in mortality [1–3]. Since professional groups, especially gastroenterologists, generally prefer colonoscopy as the most effective tool for colorectal cancer prevention , a considerable proportion of people with adenomatous polyps are discovered at the time of screening. Accordingly, a large number of people require post-polypectomy surveillance, which places a huge burden on medical resources [4, 5]. Recent data showing that 20% of colonoscopies performed in practice were for surveillance after polypectomy  indicate the importance of appropriate allocation of medical resources. Therefore, efficient and safe guidelines on surveillance colonoscopy are needed to decrease the cost, risk and over-use of colonoscopy.
Before the 1990s, because there was no available guidelines, annual follow-up colonoscopy was common practice after polypectomy. The National Polyp Study, showing that it was safe to defe ...
- Levin, B, Lieberman, DA, McFarland, B (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58: pp. 130-160 CrossRef
- Rex, DK, Johnson, DA, Anderson, JC (2009) American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 104: pp. 739-750 CrossRef
- Arditi, C, Peytremann Bridevaux, I, Burnand, B (2009) Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 41: pp. 200-208 CrossRef
- Vijan, S, Inadomi, J, Hayward, RA (2004) Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20: pp. 507-515 CrossRef
- Ladabaum, U, Song, K (2005) Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 129: pp. 1151-1162 CrossRef
- Lieberman, DA, Garmo, PL, Fleischer, DE (2000) Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States. Gastroenterology 118: pp. 619-624 CrossRef
- Winawer, SJ, Zauber, AG, O’Brien, MJ (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328: pp. 901-906 CrossRef
- Winawer, SJ, Fletcher, RH, Miller, L (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112: pp. 594-642 CrossRef
- Byers, T, Levin, B, Rothenberger, D (1997) American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 47: pp. 154-160 CrossRef
- Winawer, S, Fletcher, R, Rex, D (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124: pp. 544-560 CrossRef
- Atkin, WS, Morson, BC, Cuzick, J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326: pp. 658-662 CrossRef
- Winawer, SJ, Zauber, AG, Fletcher, RH (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 130: pp. 1872-1885 CrossRef
- Mysliwiec, PA, Brown, ML, Klabunde, CN (2004) Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141: pp. 264-271
- Boolchand, V, Olds, G, Singh, J (2006) Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med 145: pp. 654-659
- Schoen, RE, Pinsky, PF, Weissfeld, JL (2010) Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology 138: pp. 73-81 CrossRef
- Saini, SD, Nayak, RS, Kuhn, L (2009) Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 43: pp. 554-558 CrossRef
- Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, Gangarosa L. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s10620-011-1791-y.
- Ben-Horin, S, Bar-Meir, S, Avidan, B (2007) The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists’ recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102: pp. 2680-2685 CrossRef
- Lebwohl, B, Kastrinos, F, Glick, M (2011) The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 73: pp. 1207-1214 CrossRef
- How Can the Over-Use of Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy Be Modified?
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume 56, Issue 9 , pp 2514-2516
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors