Abstract
Historically, drug use has been understood as a problem of epidemiology, psychiatry, physiology, and criminality requiring legal and medical governance. Consequently drug research tends to be underpinned by an imperative to better govern, and typically proposes policy interventions to prevent or solve drug problems. We argue that categories of ‘addictive’ and ‘recreational’ drug use are discursive forms of governance that are historically, politically and socially contingent. These constructions of the drug problem shape what drug users believe about themselves and how they enact these beliefs in their drug use practices. Based on qualitative interviews with young illicit drug users in Brisbane, Australia, this paper uses Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality to provide insights into how the governance of illicit drugs intersects with self-governance to create a drug user self. We propose a reconceptualisation of illicit drug use that takes into account the contingencies and subjective factors that shape the drug experience. This allows for an understanding of the relationships between discourses, policies, and practices in constructions of illicit drug users.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agar, M. (1997). Ethnography: An overview. Substance Use and Misuse, 32(9), 1155–1173.
Berridge, V., & Edwards, G. (1987). Opium and the people: Opiate use in nineteenth-century England. London: Yale University Press.
Bourgois, P. (1998). Just another night in a shooting gallery. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(2), 37–66.
Bull, M. (2008). Governing the heroin trade: From treaties to treatment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Carrington, K. (1993). Offending girls: Sex, youth and justice. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Coomber, R., & Sutton, C. (2006). How quick to heroin dependence. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25(5), 463–471.
Cruikshank, B. (1993). Revolutions within: Self-government and self-esteem. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 231–252). London: UCL Press.
Davies, J. (1997). The myth of addiction (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Harwood.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1984). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 340–372). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality: Volume 2: The use of pleasure. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In M. Foucault & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Ethics, subjectivity and truth: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (pp. 281–302). New York: The New Press.
Fraser, S., & Moore, D. (2008). Dazzled by unity? Order and chaos in public discourse on illicit drug use. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 740–752.
Garland, D. (1997). ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 173–214.
Gourley, M. (2004). A subcultural study of recreational ecstasy use. Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 59–73.
Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hammersley, R., Khan, F., & Ditton, J. (2002). Ecstasy and the rise of the chemical generation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(5), 437–438.
Keane, H. (2002). What’s wrong with addiction?. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Kelly, P. (2006). The entrepreneurial self and ‘Youth at risk’: Exploring the horizons of identity in the twenty-first century. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(1), 17–32.
Kendall, G. (2011). Foucaultian approaches to the self. In A. Elliott (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of identity studies (pp. 67–82). London: Routledge.
MacKenzie, R. (2008). Feeling good: The ethopolitics of pleasure; psychoactive substance use and public health and criminal justice governance: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug courts in the USA. Social and Legal Studies, 17(4), 513–533.
MacLean, S. (2005). It might be scummy-arsed but it’s a sick buzz: Chroming and pleasure. Contemporary Drug Problems, 32(2), 295–318.
Manderson, D. (1993). From Mr Sin to Mr Big: A history of Australian drug laws. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Martin, A., & Stenner, P. (2004). Talking about drug use: What are we (and our participants) doing in qualitative research? International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 395–405.
Measham, F., Aldridge, J., & Parker, H. (1998). The teenage transition: From recreational drug use to the dance culture. Journal of Drug Use, 28(1), 9–22.
Measham, F., & Shiner, M. (2009). The legacy of normalisation: The role of classical and contemporary criminological theory in understanding young people’s drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 502–508.
Moore, D. (1992). Deconstructing “dependence”: An ethnographic critique of an influential concept. Contemporary Drug Problems, 19(3), 459–490.
Moore, D. (2002). Opening up the cul-de-sac of youth drug studies: A contribution to the construction of some alternative truths. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29, 13–64.
O’Malley, P. (2004). Risking drug use. In P. O’Malley (Ed.), Risk, uncertainty and government (pp. 155–172). London: GlassHouse Press.
O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2004). Pleasure, freedom and drugs: The uses of ‘pleasure’ in liberal governance on drug and alcohol consumption’. Sociology, 38(1), 25–42.
Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Routledge.
Parssinen, T., & Kerner, K. (1980). Development of the disease model of drug addiction in Britain, 1870–1926. Medical History, 24, 275–296.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). California: Sage.
Paylor, I., Measham, F., & Wilson, A. (2012). Social work and drug use. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Reinarman, C. (2005). Addiction as accomplishment: The discursive construction of disease. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(4), 307–320.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing advanced liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). London: UCL Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). New York: Free Association Books.
Royal Commission into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, South Australia. (1978). The social control of drug use: A discussion paper. Adelaide: South Australian Government.
Seddon, T. (2006). Drugs, crime and social exclusion: Social context and social theory in British drugs-crime research. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 680–703.
Seddon, T. (2010). A history of drugs: Drugs and freedom in the liberal age. Abingdon: Routledge.
Seddon, T. (2011). Court-ordered treatment, neoliberalism and Homo economicus. In S. Fraser & D. Moore (Eds.), The drug effect: Health, crime and society (pp. 155–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, M. (2003). The relationship between drug use and crime: A puzzle inside an enigma. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 307–319.
Stewart, T. (1987). The heroin users. London: HarperCollins.
Szasz, T. (1971). The ethics of addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 128(5), 541–546.
Treichler, P. (1999). How to have theory in an epidemic: Cultural chronicles of AIDS. Durham: Duke University Press.
Valentine, K. (2007). Methadone maintenance treatment and making up people. Sociology, 41(3), 497–514.
Valentine, K., & Fraser, S. (2008). Trauma, damage and pleasure: Rethinking problematic drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 410–416.
Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vrecko, S. (2010). Birth of a brain disease: Science, the state and addiction neuropolitics. History of the Human Sciences, 23(4), 52–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pereira, M., Carrington, K. Irrational Addicts and Responsible Pleasure Seekers: Constructions of the Drug User. Crit Crim 24, 379–389 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-015-9298-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-015-9298-z