Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How the News was Made: The Anti-Social Behaviour Day Count, Newsmaking Criminology and the Construction of Anti-Social Behaviour

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Newsmaking criminology’ is an approach to criminological research characterised by critical engagement with topics being covered by the news media, offering greater engagement with public debate and reflexive critique of the objects of criminological knowledge. Two examples of Brisith criminological researchers taking an identifiable ‘newsmaking’ approach are discussed in this paper: the Anti-Social Behaviour One Day Count, a 24-h comprehensive survey of reports of anti-social behaviour carried out in 2003, and the 24-h Domestic Violence Audit, carried out in 2000. This paper analyses the construction of knowledge of anti-social behaviour through the Day Count, identifying continuities and discontinuities between the Day Count and the Domestic Violence Audit. This leads to a discussion of the strengths and limitations of the ‘newsmaking’ approach, suggesting that it may serve conservative as well as progressive ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barak, G. (1988). Newsmaking criminology: Reflections of the media, intellectuals, and crime. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (1994/1995). A response to the editors’ call for dialogue: Time for an integrated critical criminology. The Critical Criminologist, 6&7, 3–6.

  • Barak, G. (2007). Doing newsmaking criminology from within the academy. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burney, E. (2004). Talking tough, acting coy: What happened to the anti-social behaviour order? Howard Journal, 41(5), 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1988). Two visions of community crime prevention. In T. Hope & M. Shaw (Eds.), Communities and crime reduction (pp. 280–286). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (2011). Broken Windows, broken promises: from the CSO to the ASBO. Given at York Deviancy Conference, 1 July.

  • Garland, D., & Sparks, R. (2000). Criminology, social theory and the challenge of our times. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2003). The one day count of anti-social behaviour. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2004). Defining and measuring anti-social behaviour, HODPR 26. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2011). Anti-Social Behaviour Order Statistics-England and Wales 2010. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons. (2007). Tackling Anti-Social Behaviour, HC246. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B. (2003). Developing locally-led responses to anti-social behaviour. Speech to New Local Government Network, June 10.

  • Labour Party. (1995). A quiet life: Tough action on criminal neighbours. London: Labour Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, L. (2000). Shock toll of women victims. Mail Online, 25 October. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5255/Shock-toll-women-victims.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2012.

  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S. (2006). A suicidal woman, roaming pigs and a noisy trampolinist: Refining the ASBO’s definition of ‘Anti-social Behaviour’. Modern Law Review, 69(2), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2006). Tackling Anti-social Behaviour, HC 99 2006–2007. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (1999). Criticism and criminology: In search of legitimacy. Theoretical Criminology, 3(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, P. (2004). What is anti-social behaviour? Criminal Law Review, 908–25.

  • Smart, C. (1992). Feminist approaches to criminology or Postmodern Woman meets Atavistic Man. In L. Gelsthorpe & A. Morris (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in criminology (pp. 70–84). Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. (2001). The Day to Count: Reflections on a methodology to raise awareness about the impact of domestic violence in the UK. Criminal Justice, 1(2), 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & O’Maolchatha, A. (1989). Reassessing the critical metaphor: An optimistic revisionist view. Justice Quarterly, 6(2), 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C., Stockdale, J., & Razzu, G. (2003). The economic and social costs of anti-social behaviour: A review. London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 127, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (2004) Perceptions and experience of antisocial behaviour: Findings from the 2003/4 British Crime Survey, Home Office Online Report 49/04. London: The Stationery Office.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phil Edwards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, P. How the News was Made: The Anti-Social Behaviour Day Count, Newsmaking Criminology and the Construction of Anti-Social Behaviour. Crit Crim 21, 211–225 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9167-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9167-y

Keywords

Navigation