Abstract
In an effort to examine how higher education institutions have provided women with resources to handle issues that disproportionately affect them, this study assessed the availability of women’s resource centers on college campuses within the United States, with a particular focus on sexual assault-related resources. A website content analysis was conducted, through which we coded to assess ease of use, clarity, and comprehensiveness of the programs and information made available to women. Although many universities had sexual assault literature, few had women’s resource centers. In addition, the quality of literature and programs varied greatly among the universities. Future research should attempt to explain organizational differences in college responses to the call for resources, as well as examine women’s experiences with resources on campus.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The terms victim and survivor will be used interchangeably throughout the text. Survivor will be most often used as it is considered more appropriate by feminist and advocacy literature.
The University of Texas list is from their website retrieved on January 5th, 2006 and the Thomson-Peterson book is from 2004. There was not a more current version of the book available at the time.
Some of the schools in this sample are specialty but they met the over 1,000 undergraduate criteria so they were included as to not further limit the sampling frame.
These schools generally do not have sexual assault resources or women’s resource centers. Rape is an issue on college campuses for women ages 18–24 and they are underrepresented in these other schools.
There were five universities that did not have search engines, so we consulted their student handbooks and student organizations via the web.
Two coders were used to code the websites. The first coder coded all 60 of the sites. The second coder randomly coded 30 of the sites and only 3 of those 30 coded were different from the original coder. The coders examined the differences and came to agreement but that still leaves the original coding reliability at 90%.
Although the definition of a ‘women’s resource center’ is quite arbitrary, we are looking for any form of center that provides resources to women and this could be within the realm of a diversity center or another such labeled center.
This statement must include: the right of the complainant to know the outcome of the hearing, have others present at the hearing, the right of students to be notified of available counseling, mental health or student services both on campus and in the community, the right to notification and options for available assistance in, changing and living situations after alleged assault, and lastly, the accused has the right to have others present at the hearing.
References
Abbey, A. L., Thomson, L., McDuffie, D., & McAuslan, P. (1996). Alcohol and dating risk factors for sexual assault among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 147–169.
Adams, A., & Abarbanel, G. (1988). Sexual assault on campus: What colleges can do. Santa Monica, CA: Rape Treatment Center Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center.
Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., Baishali, R., & Martin, J. (2003). College student internet use. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20, 182–185.
American College Health Association. (2004). Healthy Campus 2010: Making it happen. Baltimore, MD: American College Health Association.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & Sweeney, B. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483–489.
Bohmer, C., & Parrot, A. (1993). Sexual assault on campus: The problem and the solution. New York: Lexington Books.
Bondurant, B. (2001). University women’s acknowledgement of rape. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 294–314.
Burt, M. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape the hidden crime (pp. 26–40). New York: Wiley.
Byrne, K. Z. (2000). The role of campus-based women’s centers. Feminist Teacher, 13, 48–61.
DeKeseredy, W., & Schwartz, M. (1998). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the canadian national survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DeKeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., & Alvi, S. (2000). The role of profeminist men in dealing with woman abuse on the Canadian college campus. Violence Against Women, 6(9), 918–935.
Escoffery, C., Miner, K. R., Adame, D. D., Butler, S., McCormick, L., & Mendell, E. (2005). Internet use for health information among college students. Journal of American College Health, 53(4), 183–188.
Federal ruling says colleges and universities can’t silence rape victims. (2004). Black Issues in Higher Education, 21(14), 15–16.
Fisher, B., Cullen, F., & Turner, M. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women: Findings from two national-level studies. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Stastics.
Garrett-Gooding, J., & Senter, R. (1987). Attitudes and acts of sexual aggression on a university campus. Sociological Inquiry, 59, 348–371.
Gilbert, N. (1991). The phantom epidemic of sexual assault. Public Interest, 103, 54–64.
Hayes-Smith, R. M., & Levett, L. M. (2007, November). Sexual assault resources on campus: Availability and adequacy. Paper presented at the 59th annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
Karjane, H. M., Fisher, B. S., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Campus sexual assault: How America’s institutions of higher education respond. Final report, NIJ Grant #1999-WA-VX-0008. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.
Kasper, B. (2004). Campus-based women’s centers: A review of problems and practices. Affilia, 19, 185–198.
Koss, M. P., Gidcyz, C. A., & Wisniewski, W. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
Martell, D., & Avitabile, N. E. (1998). Feminist community organizing on a college campus. Affilia, 13, 393–410.
Morse, S. (2000). A license for bias: Sex discrimination, schools, and Title IX. Newton, IA: American Association of University Women.
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs. (1981). Title IX: The half full, half empty glass. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Institute of Justice. (2005). Sexual assault on campus: What colleges and universities are doing about it. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Potter, R. H., Krider, J. E., & McMahon, P. M. (2000). Examining elements of campus sexual violence policies: Is deterrence or health promotion favored? Violence Against Women, 6, 1345–1362.
Roiphe, K. (1993). The morning after: Sex, fear, and feminism on campus. Boston: Little, Brown.
Schwartz, M. D., & Leggett, M. S. (1999). Bad dates or emotional trauma?: The aftermath of campus sexual assault. Violence against Women, 5, 251–271.
Thomson-Peterson’s 4-year Colleges (2004). (34th ed.). Lawrenceville, NJ: Thomson-Petersons.
Ullman, S. E., & Filipas, H. H. (2001). Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(2), 369–389.
U.S. Department of Justice (2008) Uniform crime report. Retrieved from www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm.
U.S. Universities by state (n.d). Retrieved January 5, 2006, from University of Texas, Web site: http://www.utexas.edu/world/univ/state/.
Ward, S., Chapman, K., Cohn, E., White, S., & Williams, K. (1991). Acquaintance rape and the college social scene. Family Relations, 40, 65–71.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Angela Moe and Angela Simon for their invaluable assistance throughout the course of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayes-Smith, R., Hayes-Smith, J. A Website Content Analysis of Women’s Resources and Sexual Assault Literature on College Campuses. Crit Crim 17, 109–123 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9075-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9075-y