Skip to main content
Log in

A local and universal criminology of modernity: a response to comments on America’s Safest City

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cullen, F. T. (1984). Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory: The Emergence of a Structuring Tradition. New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld Totowa.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagan, J. (1989). Structural criminology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zara, G., & Farrington, D. P. (2015). Criminal recidivism : explanation, prediction and prevention. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cullen, F. T. (2017). The sociological imagination revisited: lessons from America’s Safest City. Crime, Law and Social Change. doi:10.1007/s10611-017-9685-3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon I. Singer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singer, S.I. A local and universal criminology of modernity: a response to comments on America’s Safest City. Crime Law Soc Change 67, 517–523 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9688-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9688-0

Keywords

Navigation