Abstract
In recent years, a range of western jurisdictions has introduced reforms designed to restrict and guide judicial discretion at sentencing. The reforms enacted include mandatory sentencing laws and guiding statutes prescribing sentencing purposes and principles as well as important aggravating and mitigating factors. However, formal guidelines are the most promising and well-studied innovation. We may now add China to the growing list of countries that have recognized the utility of guidelines. Over the past decade, China has slowly developed sentencing guidelines for its courts. The new guidelines contain both general directions with respect to the determination of sentence as well as specific numerical guidelines for common offences. The guidelines do not follow the approach taken by the US schemes, many of which employ a two-dimensional sentencing grid. Instead, China has adopted a strategy consisting of “Starting Point” sentences which are then adjusted by the court to reflect relevant mitigating and aggravating factors. This approach is much closer to the guidelines developed in England and Wales and those proposed but not yet implemented in New Zealand and Israel. In this article, we explore the new Chinese guidelines and provide a limited comparative analysis with guidelines in other jurisdictions. England and Wales is selected as the principal comparator since it has developed and implemented a comprehensive system consisting of both offence-specified guidelines as well as generic guidelines.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Professor, University of Oxford , E-mail: julian.roberts@worc.ox.ac.uk.
Respectively, the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford and the Erasmus China Law Centre, Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University of Rotterdam. We thank Gabrielle Watson for her meticulous research assistance.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, J.V., Pei, W. Structuring Judicial Discretion in China: Exploring the 2014 Sentencing Guidelines. Crim Law Forum 27, 3–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-015-9270-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-015-9270-3