Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge Management in Locating the Patient in an Emergency Medical Service in Italy

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines an Emergency Medical Service in order to analyze the composite set of activities and instruments directed at locating the patient. The good management of information about the location of the emergency is highly relevant for a reliable rescue service, but this information depends on knowledge of the territory that is socially distributed between EMS operators and callers. Accordingly, the decision-making process often has to go beyond the emergency service protocols, engaging the operator in undertaking an open negotiation in order to transform the caller’s role from layman to “co-worker”. The patient’s location turns out to be an emerging phenomenon, collaborative work based on knowledge management involving two communities—the callers and the EMS operators—that overlap partially. Drawing examples from emergency calls, the study analyzes the practice of locating a patient as a complex and multi-layered process, highlighting the role played by new and old technologies (the information system and the paper maps) in this activity. We argue that CSCW technologies enable the blended use of different kinds of instruments and support an original interconnection between the professional localization systems and the public’s way of defining a position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This definition echoes a similar distinction proposed by the environmental psychology between “survey” (abstract understanding of the spatial relationships between locations) and “route” (the personal knowledge of places or landmarks and the routes that connect them). See Münzer et al. 2006; Tversky 1993.

References

  • Artman, H., & Waern, Y. (1999). Distributed cognition in an emergency co-ordination center. Cognition, Technology and Work, vol.1.

  • Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1970). L’empire des signes. Paris: Skira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R., Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Shapiro, D., et al. (1992). Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control. In J. Turner, & R. Kraut (eds), CSCW ’92. Proceedings of the conference on computer supported cooperative work, Toronto, Canada, October 31 to November 4, 1992. New York: ACM Press, pp. 123–129.

  • Bernini, G. (1994). La banca dati del ‘progetto di Pavia’ sull’italiano lingua seconda. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 23(2), 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (1999). Human error and information system failure: the case of the London Ambulance service computer-aided despatch system project. Interacting with Computers, 11, 699–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M. (2001). The ethnography of healt and medicine. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, & S. Delamont (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D. H. (Eds.). (1991). Talk and social studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. M., Martin, D. (1999). Informing collaborative information visualization through an ethnography of ambulance control. In Bødker S., M. Kyng, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW’99 Proceedings of the sixth conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 12–16, 1999. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 309–330.

  • Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1), 19–24. Springer-Verlag.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovigo, F. (2004). Abitare la salute. Franco Angeli: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovigo, F., & Redaelli, I. (2007). Ordinarie emergenze. Milano, Guerini Scientifica.

  • Duranti, A. (1992). Etnografia del parlare quotidiano. Carocci: Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information System, 18(1), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (Eds.). (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A., Dowell, J. (1996). A comedy of errors: the London ambulance service case study. In Proc. 8th International Workshop on Software Specifications & Design IWSSD-8, Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 2–4.

  • Fitch, K. L., & Sanders, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G., & Russo, N. L. (2005). The turnaround of the London ambulance service computer-aided despatch system (Lascad). European Journal of Information System, 14(3), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, G. (2003). Emergent expertise sharing in a new community. In M. Ackermann, V. Pipek, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Sharing expertise: beyond knowledge management (pp. 81–106). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1998). Eterotopie. In A. Pandolfi (Ed.), Archivio Foucault. Interventi, colloqui, interviste, vol. 3, 1978–85, Estetica dell’esistenza, etica, politica. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in etnomethodology. Prentice-Hall: Englewoods Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodied within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, K. (2004). Knowing who knows—an alternative approach to knowledge management, PhD Thesis, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

  • Groth, K., & Bowers, J. (2001). On finding things out: situating organizational knowledge, ECSCW’01, Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 16–20 September 2001, Bonn, Germany. Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 259–278.

  • Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Tecnology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landgren, J. (2005). Supporting fire crew sensemaking enroute to incidents. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2(3), 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luff, P., Gilbert, N., & Frohlich, D. (1990). Computer and conversation. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Workplace studies. Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Bowers, J., & Wastell, D. (1997). The interactional affordances of technology: an ethnography of human-computer interaction in an ambulance control centre. In People and Computers XII, Proceedings of HCI'97 (Cambridge).

  • Martin, D., O’Neill, J., Randall, D., & Rouncefield, M. (2007). How can I help you? Call centres, classification work and coordination. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., Wright, P., & Cooke, M. (2004). From information processing to dialogical meaning making. Cognition, Technology and Work, 6, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münzer, S., Zimmer, H. D., Schwalm, M., Baus, J., & Aslan, I. (2006). Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normark, M., & Randall, D. (2005). Local expertise at an emergency call center, ECSCW’05 Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Paris, France, 18–22 September 2005, Netherlands, Springer, pp. 247–366.

  • Paoletti, I. (2009). Communication and diagnostic work in medical emergency calls in Italy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 229–250. doi:10.1007/s10606-009-9091-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, M., Randall, D., & Helgeson, B. (2004). Ambiguities, awareness and economy: a study of emergency service work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13, 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D., O’Brien, J., Rouncefield, M., & J. A. Hughes (1996). Organzational memory and CSCW, conference on HCI (OzCHI ’96), Supporting the ‘Mavis’ Phenomenon. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 2427 November 1996, Hamilton, New Zealand, Los Alamitos, California, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 26–34.

  • Suchman, L. (1997). Centers of coordination: a case and some themes. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: essays on situated cognition. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjora, A. H. (2001). The tecnological mediation of the nursing-medical boundary. Sociology of Healt & Illness, 22(69), 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency services request: a problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol.30(4), pp.315–343. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3.

  • Turner, B., & Pidgeon, N. (1997). Man-made disasters. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: A. U. Frank, & I. Campari (Eds.), COSIT'93, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 716, 14–24. Springer, Berlin.

  • Wakin, M. A., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1999). Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 409–437. doi:10.1207/S15327973rls3204_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, Meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and learning systems. Organizations, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psycology Quaterly, 50(2), 172–185. doi:10.2307/2786750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2005). Working a call. Multiparty management and interactional infrastructure. In C. D. Baker, M. Emmison, & A. Firth (Eds.), Calling for help. Language and social interaction in telephone helplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1992a). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 418–469). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1992b). Achieving context. Openings in emergency calls. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context (pp. 35–51). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Dovigo.

Appendix

Appendix

Transcription of calls n.1 and 2 of case n.15. (original language). The transcriptional convention derives from “La banca dati del “Progetto di Pavia” sull’italiano lingua seconda” (Bernini 1994)

Call n. 1 (1’20”): C\ chiamante; I\ infermiere di centrale operativa; V\ volontario del soccorso sul territorio

1.

\I\ centodiciotto

2.

\C\ senta telefono da- O. C’è_ qui_ mio_ cugino_ A._ di_ cinquant’_anni che si è/sta male. Si è sdraiato &sul divano&

3.

\I\ &O.& in che via signora?&

4.

\C\ O. noi siamo in basso. Avete presente l’ombrellificio=

5.

\I\ no mi deve dare la via

6.

\C\ sì se voi venite all’ombrellificio B._sapete_ dov’è_ l’_ombrellificio_ B.?

7.

\I\ !no! non arrivo io da L. signora

8.

\C\ a ecco

9.

\I\ le mando l’ambulanza della zona

10.

\C\ !sì appunto! Dica lì, sopra il cortile. Io mi faccio trovare/ quando prende la strada no, per venire=

11.

\I\ = signora ascolti una cosa, ci sarà una via no?

12.

\C\ !via B.!

13.

\I\ ok

14.

\C\ ma non è conosciuta

15.

\I\ !fa niente! Lei mi dia la via &perché&

16.

\C\ &via B.&

17.

\I\ è inutile che lo spiega a me

18.

\C\ numero ventuno però se dice adesso all’ambulanza

19.

\I\ sì

20.

\C\ che ci facciamo trovare !sulla strada!, all’imbocco della strada che sale per O.

21.

\I\ sì

22.

\C\ noi_ ci_ facciamo_ trovare_ e_ lo_ accompagnamo_ perché_ è_ una_ via_ un_ po’_ fuori

23.

\I\ sì, va bene, quello va bene però

24.

\C\ sì

25.

\I\ almeno_ per_ avere_ un_ punto_ di_ riferimento

26.

\C\ sì_ sì, via B.

27.

\I\ la via/ il_ il nome della famiglia

28.

\C\ B.E.

29.

\I\ B. E’ uno che soffre già di qualcosa?

30.

\C\ no_ no_ no_ no_ no.

31.

\I\ e’ sano

32.

\C\ sano_ sì

33.

\I\ adesso si è sentito male?

34.

\C\ si sta sentendo male

35.

\I\ &è sveglio però^&

36.

\C\ &no_ no_no (XX)& sta sudando

37.

\I\ va bene glielo mando subito, grazie_buongiorno

38.

\C\ salve. Allora ha capito bene? O.

49.

\I\ sì, al limite ho il numero di telefono_ signora_ se_ rimane_ qualcuno-

40.

\C\ sì

41.

\I\ a casa

42.

\C\ sì, io

43.

\I\ va bene, grazie

44.

\C\ un po’ in fretta eh^

Call n. 2 (40”)

1.

\V\ C. ?[risponde dicendo il nome del paese in cui ha sede l’associazione del soccorso]

2.

\I\ sì_ ciao_ mi_ vai_ per_ cortesia a [+] O. m’ha detto che la via si chiama via B.

3.

\V\ via B.

4.

\I\ ha detto che è una via difficile da raggiungere nel senso che O. giù in basso dove c’è l’ombrellificio B., &qualcosa del genere&

5.

\V\ &ah in fondo, si ho capito&=

6.

\I\ = ecco. Arriva anche il medico un uomo di cinquant’anni, nulla in anamnesi adesso malore improvviso, svenimento, pallido, sudatissimo

7.

\V\ &giallo?&

8.

\I\ &ti mando anche il medico&

9.

\V\ va bene

10.

\I\ è un giallo_rosso

11.

\V\ giallo_rosso?

12.

\I\ sì, ciao

Call n.1:; C\ caller; O\ Operator (registered nurse); V\Volunteer

1.

O\ 118

2.

C\ I’m calling from O. [the village name]. My cousin A., fifty years old, doesn’t feel very well. He is lying down on the sofa

3.

O\ Oh, what is the name of the street?

4.

C\ Oh, we are in the lower part [of the village]. Do you know the umbrella factory?

5.

O\ No, you have to tell me the street name

6.

C\ Yes, if you come to the umbrella factory. Do you know where B.’ s factory is?

7.

O\ No, I’m not coming to you from Lecco madam

8.

C\ I know

9.

O\ I’m sending you a local ambulance

10.

C\ Yes, ok. Tell them above the courtyard. I will be there. When you take the road to come

11.

O\ Madam, listen to me. There is a name for that street, isn’t there?

12.

C\ B. street!

13.

O\ Ok

14.

C\ But no-one knows it

15.

O\ It doesn’t matter. You have to tell me the name because

16.

C\ B. street

17.

O\ you don’t have to explain to me

18.

C\ Number twenty-one but call for the ambulance now, please

19.

O\ Yes

20.

C\ We’ll be on the road, at the entrance of the road that ascent to O.

21.

O\ Ok

22.

C\ We’ll meet on the road and I’ll go with you because it’s a out of the way

23.

O\ Ok, good, all right but

24.

C\ Yes

25.

O\ Is there at least a reference point

26.

C\ Yes, Yes, street B.

27.

O\ The street, the family name

28.

C\ B.E.

29.

O\ B.E. does he already have some illness?

30.

C\ No, no, no, no

31.

O\ He’s healthy

32.

C\ Yes, he is healthy

33.

O\ And now he feels ill?

34.

C\ He is ill now

35.

O\ Is he awake?

36.

C\ No, no, no he is sweating

37.

O\ Ok, I send you someone immediately. Thank you, good morning

38.

C\ Hi. So have you understand? O.

39.

O\ Yes, at least I have your telephone number too if someone stays

40.

C\ Yes

41.

O\ At home

42.

C\ Yes, I’ll stay

43.

O\ Ok, thank you

44.

C\ Quikly

Call n. 2

1.

V\ C.? [The volunteer responded by saying the village name of the assistance association headquarters]

2.

O\ Hello, please go to O. The caller told me that the street name is B.

3.

V\ B. street

4.

O\ She told me that is an unknown street. In O., in the southern part, where there is the B.’s umbrellas factory, something like that

5.

V\ Yes, at the end...I’ve understood

6.

O\ The doctor is arriving too, a man fifty years old, with nothing in particular in his case history now he suddenly feels ill, he fainted, he is pale and is sweating

7.

V\ Yellow?

8.

O\ I’m sending a doctor too

9.

V\ All right

10.

O\ It’s a yellow red

11.

V\ Yellow red?

12.

O\ yes, Bye

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dovigo, F., Redaelli, I. Knowledge Management in Locating the Patient in an Emergency Medical Service in Italy. Comput Supported Coop Work 19, 457–481 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9118-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9118-7

Key words

Navigation