Abstract
This study explores how peer support providers’ roles are defined and integrated in inter-professional mental health care teams, and how these providers relate to other practitioners and clients. Interviews were conducted with peer support providers in two different formal models of peer support employment. Qualitative data analysis was undertaken. The findings indicate that: peer support providers experience ambiguity and that some ambiguity may offer benefits; peer support providers enhance team acceptance of their role through several means and strategies; setting boundaries with clients is a delicate issue that requires several considerations that we discuss.
References
Adame, A. L., & Leitner, L. M. (2008). Breaking out of the mainstream: The evolution of peer support alternatives to the mental health system. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 10(3), 146–162.
Besio, S. W., & Mahler, J. (1993). Benefits and challenges of using consumer staff in supported housing services. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44(5), 490–491.
Campbell, J., & Leaver, J. (2003). Emerging new practices in organized peer support. National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning and National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors.
Carlson, L. S., Rapp, C. A., & McDiarmid, D. (2001). Hiring consumer-providers: Barriers and alternative solutions. Community Mental Health Journal, 37(3), 199–213.
Chinman, M., Lucksted, A., Gresen, R., Davis, M., Losonczy, M., Sussner, B., & Martone, L. (2008). Early experience of employing consumer-providers in the VA. Psychiatric Services, 59(11), 1315–1321.
Chinman, M. J., Weingarten, R., Stayner, D., & Davidson, L. (2001). Chronicity reconsidered. Improving person environment fit through a consumer-run service. Community Mental Health Journal, 37(3), 215–229.
Corrigan, P. W., Sokol, K. A., & Rusch, N. (2013). The impact of self-stigma and mutual help programs on the quality of life of people with serious mental illnesses. Community Mental Health Journal, 49, 1–6.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davidson, L., Bellamy, C., Kimberly, G., & Miller, R. (2012). Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: A review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry, 11, 125–128.
Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D., & Rowe, M. (2006). Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(3), 443–450.
Dixon, L., Hackman, A., & Lehman, A. (1997). Consumers as staff in assertive community treatment programs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 25(2), 199–208.
Dixon, L., Krauss, N., & Lehman, A. (1994). Consumers as service providers: The promise and challenge. Community Mental Health Journal, 30, 615–625.
Gates, L. B., & Akabas, S. H. (2007). Developing strategies to integrate peer providers into staff of mental health agencies. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 34(3), 293–306.
Gillard, S. G., Edwards, C., Gibson, S. L., Owen, K., & Wright, C. (2013). Introducing peer worker roles into UK mental health service teams: A qualitative analysis of the organizational benefits and challenges. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 188.
Jacobson, N., Trojanowski, L., & Dewa, C. (2012). What do peer support workers do? A job description. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 205.
Lammers, J., & Happell, B. (2003). Consumer participation in mental health services: Looking from a consumer perspective. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 385–392.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mead, S., Hilton, D., & Curtis, L. (2001). Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 134–141.
Mead, S., & MacNeil, C. (2006). Peer support: What makes it unique? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10(2), 29–37.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MOHLTC (Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care). (2005). Ontario Program Standards for ACT Teams.
Moll, S., Holmes, J., Geronimo, J., & Sherman, D. (2009). Work transitions for peer support providers in traditional mental health programs: Unique challenges and opportunities. IOS Press, 33, 449–458.
Moran, G. S., Russinova, Z., Gidugu, V., & Gagne, C. (2013). Challenges experienced by paid peer providers in mental health recovery: A qualitative study. Community Mental Health Journal, 49, 281–291.
Mowbray, C. T., Moxley, D. P., & Collins, M. E. (1998). Consumers as mental health providers: First-person accounts of benefits and limitations. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 25(4), 297–411.
O’Hagan, M., Cyr, C., McKee, H., & Priest, R. for the Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2010). Making the case for peer support: Report to the Peer Support Project Committee of the Mental Health Commission of Canada.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Silverstein, S., & Bellack, A. S. (2008). A scientific agenda for the concept of recovery as it applies to schizophrenia. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1108–1124.
Stotland, N., Mattson, M., & Bergeson, S. (2008). The recovery concept: Clinician and consumer perspectives. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 14(suppl 2), 45–54.
Verhaeghe, M., Bracke, P., & Bruynooghe, K. (2008). Stigmatization and self-esteem of persons in recovery from mental illness: The role of peer support. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54, 206–218.
Walker, G., & Bryant, W. (2013). Peer support in adult mental health services: A metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 36(1), 28–34.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Telfer School of Management Research Funds (SMRF Supervision/Research) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asad, S., Chreim, S. Peer Support Providers’ Role Experiences on Interprofessional Mental Health Care Teams: A Qualitative Study. Community Ment Health J 52, 767–774 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9970-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9970-5