Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Theory Meets Practice: The Localization of Wraparound Services for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance

Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study identified statewide variation in implementation of wraparound for children on the severe emotional disturbance (SED) Waiver in Kansas. SED Waivers allow Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) to offer an array of community-based services to high risk youth. Qualitative methods, including interviews, reviews of charts and billing records, and a survey, were employed. Stratified random sampling was used to select seven CMHCs, and random sampling was used to select individual cases for interviews. Although CMHCs shared similar wraparound philosophy and service initiation processes, each developed their own localized wraparound model within the confines of Medicaid eligibility and documentation rules. Eight models for wraparound team composition were identified. Findings demonstrate implementation of wraparound with fidelity to a central model is difficult on a large scale. The balance of standardized wraparound practices, localized innovations, and agency compliance with Medicaid is essential for optimizing children’s mental health services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. A., Wright, E. R., Kooreman, H. E., Mohr, W. K., & Russell, L. A. (2003). The Dawn project: A model for responding to the needs of children with emotional and behavioral challenges and their families. Community Mental Health Journal, 39, 63–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J. (2008). The evidence base and wraparound. In E. J. Bruns & J. S. Walker (Eds.), The resource guide to wraparound. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center for Family Support and Children’s Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2008). State implementation of evidence-based practice for youths, Part 1: Responses to the state of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 369–373. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816485f4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Suter, J. C., & Leverentz-Brady, K. M. (2006). Relations between program and system variables and fidelity to the wraparound process for children and families. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1586–1593. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Walker, J. S., Zabel, M., Matarese, M., Estep, K., Harburger, D., et al. (2010). Intervening in the lives of youth with complex behavioral health challenges and their families: The role of the wraparound process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 314–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Walrath, C. M., & Sheehan, A. K. (2007). Who administers wraparound? An examination of the training, beliefs, and implementation supports for wraparound providers. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(3), 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J. D., Bruns, E. J., & Burchard, S. N. (2002). The wraparound approach. In B. J. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based Interventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 69–90). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. K. (2002). Reasons for hope for children and families: A perspective and overview. In B. J. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based treatment for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. E., Armstrong, M. I., Kuppinger, A. D., Huz, S., & McNulty, T. L. (1998). Preliminary outcomes of an experimental study comparing treatment foster care and family-centered intensive case management. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 543–580). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

  • Faw, L. (1999). The state wraparound survey. In B. J. Burns, & S. K. Goldman (Eds.), Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 1998 series, (Vol. IV, pp. 61–66). Retrieved from National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability website: http://www.ncwd-youth.info/foundations/010.

  • Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2010). America’s children in brief: Key national indicators of well-being, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, D., Schutte, K., & Walker, J. S. (2001). Strategies for increasing the effectiveness of ISP (wraparound) teams. Retrieved from Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland State University, Pathways website: http://www.pathwaysrtc.pdx.edu/pdf/cp0212.pdf.

  • ICF Macro. (2011). Children’s Mental Health Initiative (CMHI): National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and their Families Program, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA), Center for Mental health Services (CMHS). Retrieved from http://www.macrointernational.com/projects/cmhi/default.aspx.

  • McGinty, K., McCammon, S. L., & Koeppen, V. P. (2001). The complexities of implementing the wraparound approach to service provision: A view from the field. Journal of Family Social Work, 5, 95–110. doi:10.1300/j039v05n03_07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, S. L., Yaffe, J., & Harris, N. J. (2009). Evaluation of wraparound services for severely emotionally disturbed youths. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 678–685. doi:10.1177/1049731508329385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Resource Network for Child and Family Mental Health Services at the Washington Business Group on Health. (Ed.). (1999). A compilation of lessons learned from the 22 grantees of the 1997 Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program. In Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 1998 series, Volume VII. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

  • Salend, S. J. (1984). Therapy outcome research: Threats to treatment integrity. Behavior Modification, 8, 211–222. doi:10.1177/01454455840082004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suter, J. C., & Bruns, E. J. (2009). Effectiveness of the wraparound process for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12, 336–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon generalexecutive summary. Retrieved from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/summary.html.

  • VanDenBerg, J. (1993). Integration of individualized mental health services into the system of care for children and adolescents. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 20, 247–257. doi:10.1007/bf00709735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J., Bruns, E., & Burchard, J. (2003). History of the wraparound process. Retrieved from National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center for Family Support and Children’s Mental Health website: http://www.nwi.pdx.edu/NWI-book/Chapters/VanDenBerg-1.3-(history-of-wraparound).pdf.

  • Walker, J. S., & Bruns, E. J. (2007). Wraparoundkey information, evidence, and endorsements. Retrieved from Parents Anonymous website: https://panetwork.parentsanonymous.org/aspx5/docs/Wraparound20100427_Key%20information.pdf.

  • Walker, J. S., & Bruns, E. J. (2008). Phases and activities of the wraparound process: Building agreement about a practice model. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University.

  • Walker, J. S., Bruns, E. J., VanDenBerg, J. D., Rast, J., Osher, T. W., Miles, P. et al. (2004). Phases and activities of the wraparound process. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training. Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University.

  • Walker, J. S., & Koroloff, N. (2007). Grounded theory and backward mapping: Exploring the implementation context for wraparound. The Journal of Behavioral Health Sciences and Research, 34, 443–458. doi:10.1007/s11414-007-9054-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., Koroloff, N., & Schutte, K. (2003). Implementing high quality collaborative individualized service/support planning: Necessary conditions. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K. (2005). Quality and individualization in wraparound team planning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 251–267. doi:10.1007/s10826-005-5052-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, U. M. (2008). Best practices in wraparound: A review of the national literature. Retrieved from University of Kansas, School of Social Welfare website: http://www.socwel.ku.edu/occ/index.htm.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported through a research contract with the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy N. Mendenhall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendenhall, A.N., Kapp, S.A., Rand, A. et al. Theory Meets Practice: The Localization of Wraparound Services for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance. Community Ment Health J 49, 793–804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-013-9646-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-013-9646-y

Keywords

Navigation