Abstract
Computationally efficient updating of reservoir models with new production data has received considerable attention recently. In this paper however, we focus on the challenges of updating reservoir models prior to production, in particular when new exploration wells are drilled. At this stage, uncertainty in the depositional model is highly impactful in terms of risk and decision making. Mathematically, such uncertainty is often decomposed into uncertainty of lithological trends in facies proportions which is typically informed by seismic data, and sub-seismic variability often modeled geostatistically by means of training images. While uncertainty in the training image has received considerable attention, uncertainty in the trend/facies proportion receives little to no consideration. In many practical applications, with either poor geophysical data or little well information, the trend is often as uncertain as the training image, yet is often fixed, leading to unrealistic uncertainty models. The problem is addressed through a hierarchical model of probability. Total model uncertainty is divided into first uncertainty in the training image, then uncertainty in the trend given the uncertain training image. Our methodology relies on an efficient Bayesian updating of these model parameters (trend and training image) by modeling forward-simulated well facies profiles in low-dimensional metric space. We apply this methodology to a real field case study involving wells drilled sequentially in the subsurface, where as more data becomes available, uncertainty in both training image and trend require updating to improve characterization of the facies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aanonsen, S.I., Nævdal, G., Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Vallès, B.: Ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering—a review. SPE J. 14(3), 393–412 (2009)
Boisvert, J.B., Pyrcz, M.J., Deutsh, K.V.: Multiple-point statistics for training image selection. Nat. Resour. Res. 16(4), 313–321 (2007)
Borg, I., Groenen, P.: Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York (1997)
Caumon, G., Strebelle, S., Caers, J., Journel, A.: Assessment of Global Uncertainty for Early Appraisal of Hydrocarbon Fields. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE Paper 89943, Houston, TX (2004)
Chugunova, T., Hu, L. Y.: Multiple-point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Math. Geosci. 40(2), 133–146 (2008)
Cwik, J., Mielniczuk, J.: Data-dependent bandwidth choice for a grade density kernel estimate. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 16(5), 397–405 (1993)
Deutsch, C., Gringarten, E.: Accounting for multiple-point continuity in geostatistical modeling. In: 6th International Geostatistics Congress of Southern Africa, pp 156–165. Geostatistics Association, Cape Town (2000)
Deutsch, C.V., Wang, L.: Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs. Math. Geol. 28(7), 857–880 (1996)
Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn. 53(4), 343–367 (2003)
Khodabakhshi, M., Jafarpour, B.: A Bayesian mixture-modeling approach for flow-conditioned multiple-point statistical facies simulation from uncertain training images. Water Resour. Res. 49(1), 328–342 (2013)
Lange, K., Frydendall, J, Cordua, K S, Hansen, T M, Melnikova, Y., Mosegaard, K.: A frequency matching method: solving inverse problems by use of geologically realistic prior information. Math. Geosci. 44, 783–803 (2012)
Lantuéjoul, C.: Geostatistical Simulation; Models and Algorithms. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Maharaja, A, Journel, A G, Caumon, G, Strebelle, S.: Assessment of net-to-gross uncertainty at reservoir appraisal stage: application to a turbidite reservoir offshore West Africa. In: Ortiz, J., Emery, X. (eds.) Proc Eighth Geostatistics Congress, vol. 2, pp 707–716. Gecamin, Santiago (2008)
Mariethoz, G., Caers, J.: Multiple-point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images. Wiley (2014)
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., Teller, E.: Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092 (1953)
Park, H., Scheidt, C., Fenwick, D H, Boucher, A., Caers, J.: History matching and uncertainty quantification of facies models with multiple geological interpretations. Comput. Geosci. 17(4), 609–621 (2013)
Rousseeuw, P J: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)
Scheidt, C, Caers, J.: Representing spatial uncertainty using distances and kernels. Math. Geosci. 41(4), 397–419 (2009a)
Scheidt, C., Caers, J.: Uncertainty quantification in reservoir performance using distances and kernel methods—application to a West-Africa deepwater turbidite reservoir. SPE J. 14(4), 680–692 (2009b)
Scheidt, C., Jeong, C., Caers, J., Mukerji, T.: Updating uncertainty in geological scenario based on geophysical data. In: 2014 AGU Fall Meeting (2014)
Silverman, B.W.: Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London (1986)
Strebelle, S., Payrazyan, K., Caers, J.: Modeling of a deepwater turbidite reservoir conditional to seismic data using principal component analysis and multiple-point geostatistics. SPE J. 8(3), 227–235 (2003)
Strebelle, S., Levy, M.: Using multiple-point statistics to build geologically realistic reservoir models: the MPS/FDM workflow. In: Robinson, A., Griffithd, P., Price, S., Hegre, J., Muggeridge, A. (eds.) The Future of Geological Modelling in Hydrocarbon Development. Geological Society London Special Publication, 309(1), 67–74 (2008)
Tahmasebi, P., Sahimi, M., Caers, J.: MS-CCSIM: Accelerating pattern-based geostatistical simulation of categorical variables using a multi-scale search in Fourier space. Comput. Geosci. 67, 75–88 (2014)
Tahmasebi, P., Hezarkhani, A., Sahimi, M.: Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions. Comput. Geosci. 16(3), 779–797 (2012)
Tan, X., Tahmasebi, P., Caers, J.: Comparing training-image based algorithms using an analysis of distance. Math. Geosci. 46, 149–169 (2014)
Tjelmeland, H., More, H.: Semi-Markov random fields. In: Soares, A. (ed.) Geostatistics Troia 1992, vol. 2, pp 493–504. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)
Tyler, K., Henriquez, A., Svanes, T.: Modeling heterogeneities in fluvial domains: a review on the influence on production profile. In: Yarus, J.M., Chambers, R.L. (eds.) Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistics: Principles, Methods, and Case Studies AAPG Computer Applications in Geology, vol. 3, pp 77–89 (1995)
Wand, M.P., Jones, M.C.: Kernel Smoothing. Chapman and Hall, London (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scheidt, C., Tahmasebi, P., Pontiggia, M. et al. Updating joint uncertainty in trend and depositional scenario for reservoir exploration and early appraisal. Comput Geosci 19, 805–820 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9491-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9491-x