Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating effective population size from linkage disequilibrium: severe bias in small samples

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective population size (N e) is a central concept in evolutionary biology and conservation genetics. It predicts rates of loss of neutral genetic variation, fixation of deleterious and favourable alleles, and the increase of inbreeding experienced by a population. A method exists for the estimation of N e from the observed linkage disequilibrium between unlinked loci in a population sample. While an increasing number of studies have applied this method in natural and managed populations, its reliability has not yet been evaluated. We developed a computer program to calculate this estimator of N e using the most widely used linkage disequilibrium algorithm and used simulations to show that this estimator is strongly biased when the sample size is small (<‰100) and below the true N e. This is probably due to the linkage disequilibrium generated by the sampling process itself and the inadequate correction for this phenomenon in the method. Results suggest that N e estimates derived using this method should be regarded with caution in many cases. To improve the method’s reliability and usefulness we propose a way to determine whether a given sample size exceeds the population N e and can therefore be used for the computation of an unbiased estimate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ardren WR, Kapuscinski AR (2003) Demographic and genetic estimates of effective population size (N e) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout. Mol. Ecol. 12: 35–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balloux F (1999) EASYPOP, a software for population genetics simulation. (http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/easypop.html) Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Bartley D, Bagley M, Gall G, Bentley B (1992) Use of linkage disequilibrium data to estimate effective size of hatchery and natural fish populations. Conserv. Biol. 6: 365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier P, Beaumont MA, Cornuet J-M, Luikart G (2002) Likelihood-based estimation of the effective population size using temporal changes in allele frequencies: A genealogical approach. Genetics 160: 741–751

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black CW, Krafsur ES (1985) A FORTRAN program for the calculation and analysis of two-locus linkage disequilibrium coefficients. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 70: 491–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1977) Digenic descent measures for finite populations. Genet. Res. 30: 121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England PR (1998) The conservation genetics of population bottlenecks. Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney

  • Frankham R (1995) Conservation Genetics. Ann. Rev. Genet. 29: 305–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1996) Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: A review. Genet. Res., Camb. 66: 95–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier-Gere P, Dillmann C (1992) A computer program for testing pairwise linkage disequilibria in subdivided populations. J. Hered. 83: 239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RB, Allendorf FW (1989) Genetically effective population size of large mammals: An assessment of estimators. Conserv. Biol. 3: 181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1981) Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res., Camb. 38: 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G, J-M Cornuet, Allendorf FW (1999). Temporal changes in allele frequencies provide estimates of population bottleneck size. Conserv. Biol. 13: 523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GH, Lande R (1991) Assessing extinction threats: Towards an evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv. Biol. 5: 148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlotterer C (2004) The evolution of molecular markers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 63–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunnucks P (2000) Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AC, Sherwin WB, Wayne RK (1994) Genetic variation of microsatellite loci in a bottlenecked species: The northern hairy-nosed wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii. Mol. Ecol. 3: 277–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1991) Genetic methods for estimating effective population size of Cetacean populations. In Genetic Ecology of Whales and Dolphins (ed. Hoelzel AR), pp. 279–300. International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 13, Cambridge

  • Weir B (1979) Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 35: 235–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

PRE was supported by an Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship, a Région Bourgogne Fellowship and the European Union Econogene project. Andrea Taylor kindly provided northern hairy-nosed wombat microsatellite genotypes. PRE, JMC and GL were supported by the Bureau des Ressources Génétiques. GL also received support from the Division of Biological Sciences at University of Montana.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip R. England.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

England, P.R., Cornuet, JM., Berthier, P. et al. Estimating effective population size from linkage disequilibrium: severe bias in small samples. Conserv Genet 7, 303–308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9103-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9103-8

Keywords

Navigation