Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an accepted treatment modality in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with pulmonary tumor spread. Positive intrathoracic lymph nodes at the time of PM are associated with a poor prognosis and 5-year survival rates of <20 %. Increased lymphangiogenesis in pulmonary metastases might represent an initial step for a subsequent lymphangiogenic spreading. We aimed to evaluate the presence of lymphangiogenesis in clinically lymph node negative patients undergoing PM and its impact on outcome parameters. 71 patients who underwent PM for CRC metastases were included in this dual-center study. Tissue specimens of pulmonary metastases and available corresponding primary tumors were assessed by immunohistochemistry for lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Results were correlated with clinical outcome parameters. LMVD was 13.9 ± 8.1 and 13.3 ± 8.5 microvessels/field (mean ± SD) in metastases and corresponding primary CRC; LVI was evident in 46.5 and 58.6 % of metastases and corresponding primary CRC, respectively. Samples with high LMVD had a higher likelihood of LVI. LVI was associated with early tumor recurrence in intrathoracic lymph nodes and a decreased overall survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.029). Herein, we present first evidence in a well-defined patient collective that increased lymphangiogenesis is already present in a subtype of pulmonary metastases of patients staged as N0 at the time of PM. This lymphangiogenic phenotype has a strong impact on patients’ prognosis. Our findings may have impact on the post-surgical therapeutic management of CRC patients with pulmonary spreading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United States Cancer Statistics (2014) 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group
Mitry E et al (2010) Epidemiology, management and prognosis of colorectal cancer with lung metastases: a 30-year population-based study. Gut 59(10):1383–1388
Kruger M et al (2014) Optimal timing of pulmonary metastasectomy-is a delayed operation beneficial or counterproductive? Eur J Surg Oncol 40(9):1049–1055
Treasure T et al (2009) Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: time for a trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(7):686–689
Pfannschmidt J, Hoffmann H, Dienemann H (2010) Reported outcome factors for pulmonary resection in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Thorac Oncol 5(6):S172–S178
Schweiger T et al (2014) Prognostic factors in pulmonary metastasectomy: spotlight on molecular and radiological markers. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 45(3):408–416
Garcia-Yuste M, Cassivi S, Paleru C (2010) Thoracic lymphatic involvement in patients having pulmonary metastasectomy: incidence and the effect on prognosis. J Thorac Oncol 5(6):S166–S169
Zabaleta J et al (2011) Survival after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: importance of previous liver metastasis as a prognostic factor. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(9):786–790
Hamaji M et al (2012) Is lymph node dissection required in pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal adenocarcinoma? Ann Thorac Surg 94(6):1796–1800
He Y et al (2004) Preexisting lymphatic endothelium but not endothelial progenitor cells are essential for tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Res 64(11):3737–3740
Beasley NJ et al (2002) Intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 62(5):1315–1320
Choi WW et al (2005) Angiogenic and lymphangiogenic microvessel density in breast carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathologic parameters and VEGF-family gene expression. Mod Pathol 18(1):143–152
Nishida T et al (2014) Predictors of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal carcinoma: an immunophenotypic analysis of 265 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 57(8):905–915
Gertler R et al (2009) Defining a high-risk subgroup with colon cancer stages I and II for possible adjuvant therapy. Eur J Cancer 45(17):2992–2999
Matsumoto K et al (2007) Lymphatic microvessel density is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50(3):308–314
Ishii M et al (2009) Lymphatic vessel invasion detected by monoclonal antibody D2-40 as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(9):1069–1074
Weidner N et al (1992) Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(24):1875–1887
Schoppmann A et al (2011) Comparison of lymphangiogenesis between primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastases. Anticancer Res 31(12):4605–4611
Schweiger T et al (2014) EGFR, BRAF and KRAS status in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy from primary colorectal carcinoma: a prospective follow-up study. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):946–954
Pfannschmidt J, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H (2007) Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published series. Ann Thorac Surg 84(1):324–338
Okumura S et al (1996) Pulmonary resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: experiences with 159 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112(4):867–874
Hwang MR et al (2010) Early intrapulmonary recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy related to colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 90(2):398–404
Zampino MG et al (2014) Lung metastases from colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in a single institution study. Ann Thorac Surg 98(4):1238–1245
Internullo E et al (2008) Pulmonary metastasectomy: a survey of current practice amongst members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Oncol 3(11):1257–1266
Renaud S et al (2014) Does nodal status influence survival? Results of a 19-year systematic lymphadenectomy experience during lung metastasectomy of colorectal cancer. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 18(4):482–487
Loehe F et al (2001) Value of systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 72(1):225–229
Zhang Z et al (2015) Can lymph node evaluation be performed well by video-assisted thoracic surgery? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141(1):143–151
Seebacher G et al (2014) Unexpected Lymph Node Disease in Resections for Pulmonary Metastases. Ann Thorac Surg 99:231–236
Bolukbas S et al (2014) Risk factors for lymph node metastases and prognosticators of survival in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 97(6):1926–1932
Shiono S et al (2005) Histopathologic prognostic factors in resected colorectal lung metastases. Ann Thorac Surg 79(1):278–282
Wang H et al (2010) Patterns of lymph node metastasis are different in colon and rectal carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol 16(42):5375–5379
Li M et al (2007) Colorectal cancer or colon and rectal cancer? Clinicopathological comparison between colonic and rectal carcinomas. Oncology 73(1–2):52–57
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by Christian Doppler Laboratory for Cardiac and Thoracic Diagnosis and Regeneration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10585_2015_9763_MOESM1_ESM.jpg
Supplementary Fig. 1 Schematic description of the total study cohort (n = 71) and studied sub-groups (n = 56/n = 15). Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 415 kb)
10585_2015_9763_MOESM2_ESM.jpg
Supplementary Fig. 2 Pulmonary metastases (A) and corresponding primary CRC. (B) samples with evidence of LVI exhibited significantly higher values of LMVD. Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 236 kb)
10585_2015_9763_MOESM3_ESM.jpg
Supplementary Fig. 3 LMVD (A) and LVI (B) of primary CRC and paired pulmonary metastases dependent on the primary tumor site (colon vs rectum). Supplementary material 3 (JPEG 322 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schweiger, T., Nikolowsky, C., Graeter, T. et al. Increased lymphangiogenesis in lung metastases from colorectal cancer is associated with early lymph node recurrence and decreased overall survival. Clin Exp Metastasis 33, 133–141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-015-9763-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-015-9763-9