Abstract
This paper addresses deficiencies of stochastic Weather Generators (WGs) in terms of reproduction of low-frequency variability and extremes, as well as the unanticipated effects of changes to precipitation occurrence under climate change scenarios on secondary variables. A new weather generator (named IWG) is developed in order to resolve such deficiencies and improve WGs performance. The proposed WG is composed of three major components, including a stochastic rainfall model able to reproduce realistic rainfall series containing extremes and inter-annual monthly variability, a multivariate daily temperature model conditioned to the rainfall occurrence, and a suitable multi-variate monthly generator to fit the low-frequency variability of daily maximum and minimum temperature series. The performance of IWG was tested by comparing statistical characteristics of the simulated and observed weather data, and by comparing statistical characteristics of the simulated runoff outputs by a daily rainfall-runoff model fed by the generated and observed weather data. Furthermore, IWG outputs are compared with those of the well-known LARS-WG weather generator. The tested characteristics are a variety of different daily statistics, low-frequency variability, and distribution of extremes. It is concluded that the performance of the IWG is acceptable, better than LARS-WG in the majority of tests, especially in reproduction of extremes and low-frequency variability of weather and runoff series.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdulla FA, Lettenmaier DP, Liang X (1999) Estimation of the ARNO model baseflow parameters using daily streamflow data. J Hydrol 222:37–54
Boughton W (2006) Calibrations of a daily rainfall-runoff model with poor quality data. Environ Model Softw 21:1114–1128. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.05.011
Burton A, Kilsby CG, Fowler HJ, Cowpertwait PSP, O’Connell PE (2008) RainSim: a spatial-temporal stochastic rainfall modeling system. Environ Model Softw 23:1356–1369. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.003
Caron A, Leconte R, Brissette F (2008) An improved stochastic weather generator for hydrological impact studies. Can Water Resour J 33:233–255
Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2010) A daily stochastic weather generator for preserving low-frequency of climate variability. J Hydrol 388:480–490
Cowpertwait PSP (1991) Further developments of the neyman-scott clustered point process for modeling rainfall. Water Resour Res 27:1431–1438
Cowpertwait PSP, Kilsby CG, O’Connell PE (2002) A space-time Neyman-Scott model of rainfall: Empirical analysis of extremes. Water Resour Res 38(8):1131. doi:10.1029/2001WR000709
Cox DR, Isham V (1994) Stochastic models of precipitation. Statistics for the environment 2, Water issues. Wiley, New York
Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2005) Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. J Hydrol 307:145–163. doi:10.1016/j.hydrol.2004.10.012
Dubrovsky M (1997) Creating daily weather series with use of the weather generator. Environmetrics 8:409–424
Dubrovsky M, Buchtele J, Zalud Z (2004) High-frequency and low-frequency variability in stochastic daily weather generator and its effect on agricultural and hydrologic modelling. Clim Chang 63:145–179
Favre A-C, Musy A, Morgenthaler S (2004) Unbiased parameter estimation of the Neyman–Scott model for rainfall simulation with related confidence interval. J Hydrol 286:168–178
Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578. doi:10.1002/Joc.1556
Hansen JW, Mavromatis T (2001) Correcting low-frequency variability bias in stochastic weather generators. Agric For Meteorol 109:297–310
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 1032
Jones PG, Thornton PK (1993) A rainfall generator for agricultural applications in the tropics. Agric For Meteorol 63:1–19
Kamali M, Ponnambalam K, Soulis ED (2007) Computationally efficient calibration of WATCLASS Hydrologic models using surrogate optimization. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 4:2307–2321
Khazaei MR, Zahabiyoun B, Saghafian B (2012) Assessment of climate change impact on floods using weather generator and continuous rainfall-runoff model. Int J Climatol 32:1997–2006
Kilsby CG, Jones PD, Burton A, Ford AC, Fowler HJ, Harpham C, James P, Smith A, Wilby RL (2007) A daily weather generator for use in climate change studies. Environ Model Softw 22:1705–1719. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.005
Mavromatis T, Hansen JW (2001) Interannual variability characteristics and simulated crop response of four stochastic weather generators. Agric For Meteorol 109:283–296
Nicks AD, Gander GA (1994) CLIGEN: A weather generator for climate inputs to water resource and other models. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computers in Agriculture. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, pp 3–94
Olsson J, Burlando P (2002) Reproduction of temporal scaling by a rectangular pulses rainfall model. Hydrol Process 16:611–630
Onof C, Chandler RE, Kakou A, Northrop P, Wheater HS, Isham V (2000) Rainfall modelling using Poisson-cluster processes: a review of developments. Stoch Env Res Risk A 14:384–411
Richardson CW (1981) Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resour Res 17(1):182–190
Richardson C, Wright D (1984) WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-8. USDA, Washington, DC, p 86
Sanso B, Guenni L (1999) A stochastic model for tropical rainfall at a single location. J Hydrol 214:64–73
Semenov M, Stratonovitch P (2010) Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Clim Res 41:1–14. doi:10.3354/cr00836
Semenov MA, Brooks RJ, Barrow EM, Richardson CW (1998) Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Clim Res 10:95–107
Srikanthan R, McMahon TA (2001) Stochastic generation of annual, monthly and Daily climate data: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5:653–670
Todini E (1988) Il modello afllussi deflussi del fiume Amo. Relazione Generale dello studio per conto della Regione Toscana, Tech. Report, Bologna
Todini E (1996) The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrol 175:339–382
Wang QJ, Nathan RJ (2007) A method for coupling daily and monthly time scales in stochastic generation of rainfall series. J Hydrol 346:122–130
Wilby RL, Christian WD (2007) SDSM 4.1- a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts, User Manual. http://co-public.lboro.ac.uk/cocwd/SDSM/SDSMManual.pdf
Wilks DS, Wilby RL (1999) The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models. Prog Phys Geogr 23:329–357
Zhang GP, Savenije HHG (2005) Rainfall-runoff modelling in a catchment with a complex groundwater flow system: application of the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:243–261
Acknowledgments
The NSRP model used in this paper is taken from RainSim V3 Model (Burton et al. 2008). We are grateful to A. Burton, C.G. Kilsby, H.J. Fowler, P.S.P. Cowpertwait, and P.E. O’Connell for providing the RainSim V3 Model.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 367 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khazaei, M.R., Ahmadi, S., Saghafian, B. et al. A new daily weather generator to preserve extremes and low-frequency variability. Climatic Change 119, 631–645 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0740-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0740-5