Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Air quality planning in California’s changing climate

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

California is home to some of the worst air quality in the nation and ninety percent of the state’s population lives in areas that are out of attainment with at least one of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Increasing temperatures associated with climate change will make meeting air quality standards more difficult. Under a changing climate, additional emission reductions will be needed to achieve clean air standards. These additional emission reductions and associated costs are called the “climate penalty.” Air quality planning is the process of assessing the emission reductions needed to meet air quality standards and outlining the programs and policies that will be implemented to achieve these emission reductions. This paper reviews the challenges that a changing climate will pose for air quality planning in California and identifies opportunities for adaptation. While state air quality regulators in California are taking enormous strides to address global warming, less work is happening at the regional, air district level. Air districts are the agencies responsible for developing air quality improvement plans. An important first step for regional air quality regulators will be to quantify the climate penalty and understand their region’s vulnerability to climate change. Limitations in regulatory authority could impede measures to improve preparedness. Regional agencies will likely need to look to state and federal agencies for additional emission reductions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These calculations were completed using data from air quality sites matched with temperature data from the nearest meteorological data collection site. In the San Francisco Bay Area, there were 55 air quality sites and 13 meteorological sites. In the San Joaquin Valley, there were 72 air quality sites and 14 meteorological sites. In the South Coast Air Basin, there were 63 air quality sites and 15 meteorological sites.

  2. This estimate is based on current power plant technology and does not account for any future technology changes.

  3. This estimation is based on the 2005 vehicle fleet and does not take into account any future change in vehicle technology or population. Therefore, it is not a prediction of what will happen in the future, but rather an illustration of the effect that increased temperature can have on vehicle emissions.

  4. A large fire is defined as one that is greater than 200 hectares (494 acres).

  5. The EPA recently revised the federal eight-hour ozone standard to 0.075 ppm (down from 0.08 ppm) to be more protective of human health (USEPA 2008b).

  6. For more information on the Bay Area 2009 Clean Air Plan, see: http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Planning-and-Research/Plans/Clean-Air-Plans.aspx

References

  • American Lung Association (2010) State of the air 2010. American Lung Association, Washington

  • Aw J, Kleeman MJ (2003) Evaluating the first-order effect of intraannual temperature variability on urban air pollution. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108.

  • Bedsworth L (2012) California’s local health agencies and the state’s climate adaptation strategy. Clim Change (this issue)

  • Bell M, Ellis H (2004) Sensitivity analysis of tropospheric ozone to modified biogenic emissions for the Mid-Atlantic region. Atmos Environ 38:1879–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, Goldberg R, Hogrefe C, Kinney PL, Knowlton K, Lynn B, Rosenthal J, Rosenzweig C, Patz JA (2007) Climate change, ambient ozone, and health in 50 US cities. Clim Change 82:61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, Dominici F (2004) Ozone and mortality in 95 U.S. urban communities, 1987 to 2000. J Am Med Ass 292(19):2372–2378

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasseur GP, Roeckner E (2005) Impact of improved air quality on the future evolution of climate. Geophys Res Lett 32.

  • California Air Resources Board (2007) Air resources board’s proposed state strategy for California's 2007 state implementation plan. California Environmental Protection Agency.

  • California Air Resources Board (2008) Climate change scoping plan: a framework for change, pursuant to AB 32 The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Sacramento, California.

  • California Natural Resources Agency (2009) 2009 California climate adaptation strategy. Sacramento: California Natural Resources Agency.

  • California State Legislature (2002) AB 1493 bill text. Available at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/01-02/bill/asm/ab_1451-1500/ab_1493_bill_20020722_chaptered.pdf.

  • California State Legislature (2006) AB 32: California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Bill Text. Available at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_32_bill_20060927_chaptered.pdf.

  • CAPCOA (2008) CEQA and climate change: evaluating and addressing greenhouse gas emissions from projects subject to the Environmental Quality Act. Sacramento.

  • Cayan D, Luers AL, Hanemann M, Franco G, Croes B (2006) Scenarios of climate change in California: an overview. California Climate Change Center, Sacramento.

  • Cifuentes L, Borja-Aburto VH, Gouveia N, Thurston G, Davis DL (2001) Hidden health benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation. Science 293:1257–1259

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominici F, Peng RD, Bell ML, Pham L, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM (2006) Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. J Am Med Ass 295(10):1127–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler D, Motallebi N, Kleeman M, Cayan D, Hayhoe K, Kalkstein LS, Miller N, Sheridan S, Jin J (2006) Public health-related impacts of climate change in California. California Energy Commission and California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebi KL, McGregor G (2008) Climate change, tropospheric ozone and particulate matter, and health impacts. Environ Health Perspect 116(11):1449–1455

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore AM, Jacob DJ, Bey I, Yantosca RM, Field BD, Fusco AC, Wilkinson JG (2002a) Background ozone over the United States in summer: origin, trend, and contribution to pollution episodes. J Geophys Res-Atmos 107.

  • Fiore AM, Jacob DJ, Field BD, Streets DG, Fernandes SD, Jang C (2002b) Linking ozone pollution and climate change: the case for controlling methane. Geophys Res Lett 29.

  • Fiore AM, West JJ, Horowitz LW, Naik V, Schwarzkopf MD (2008) Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission controls and the benefits to climate and air quality. J Geophys Res 113(D08307)

  • Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, Dorland RV (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco G, Sanstad AH (2008) Climate change and electricity demand in California. Clim Change 87:S139–S151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogrefe C, Lynn B, Civerolo K, Ku JY, Rosenthal J, Rosenzweig C, Goldberg R, Gaffin S, Knowlton K, Kinney PL (2004) Simulating changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions. J Geophys Res-Atmos 109.

  • Jacob DJ, Winner DA (2009) Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmos Environ 43:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ (2002) Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming. J Geophys Res 107.

  • Jacobson MZ (2007) Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 41:4150–4157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ (2008) On the causal link between carbon dioxide and air pollution mortality. Geophys Res Lett 35.

  • Kleeman MJ (2008) A preliminary assessment of the sensitivity of air quality in California to global change. Clim Change 87:S273–S292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton K, Rosenthal JE, Hogrefe C, Lynn B, Gaffin S, Goldberg R, Rosenzweig C, Civerolo K, Ku JY, Kinney PL (2004) Assessing ozone-related health impacts under a changing climate. Environ Health Perspect 112:1557–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung LR, Gustafson WI (2005) Potential regional climate change and implications to US air quality. Geophys Res Lett 32.

  • Lin CYC, Jacob DJ, Munger JW, Fiore AM (2000) Increasing background ozone in surface air over the United States. Geophys Res Lett 27:3465–3468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CYC, Jacob DJ, Fiore AM (2001) Trends in exceedances of the ozone air quality standard in the continental United States, 1980–1998. Atmos Environ 35:3217–3228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers AL, Mastrandrea M (2008) Climate change in California: scenarios for adaptation. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, London SJ, Islam T, Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Margolis HG, Peters JM (2002) Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study. Lancet 359:386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickley LJ (2007) A future short of breath? Possible effects of climate change on smog. Environment 49:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickley LJ, Jacob DJ, Field BD, Rind D (2004) Effects of future climate change on regional air pollution episodes in the United States. Geophys Res Lett 31.

  • Miller NL, Hayhoe K, Jin J, Auffhammer M (2008) Climate, extreme heat, and electricity demand in California. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:1834–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millstein DE, Harley RA (2009) Impact of climate change on photochemical air pollution in Southern California (DRAFT Paper). California Climate Change Center, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Motallebi N, Sogutlugil M, McCauley E, Taylor J (2008) Climate change impact on California on-road mobile source emissions. Clim Change 87:S293–S308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murazaki K, Hess P (2006) How does climate change contribute to surface ozone change over the United States? J Geophys Res-Atmos 111.

  • National Research Council (2004) Air quality management in the United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 401

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2006) State and federal standards for mobile source emissions. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 213

    Google Scholar 

  • Samet JM, Dominici F, Curriero FC, Coursac I, Zeger SL (2000) Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987–1994. N Engl J Med 343(24):1742–1749

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenegger A (2005) Executive order S-3-05. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/energy/ExecOrderS-3-05.htm.

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. Wiley-Interscience, New York, p 1326

    Google Scholar 

  • South Coast Air Quality Management District (2007) Final 2007 air quality management plan. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner AL, Tonse S, Cohen RC, Goldstein AH, Harley RA (2006) Influence of future climate and emissions on regional air quality in California. J Geophys Res-Atmos 111.

  • Tagaris E, Manomaiphiboon K, Liao KJ, Leung LR, Woo JH, He S, Amar P, Russell AG (2007) Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States. J Geophys Res-Atmos 112.

  • USEPA (2008a) The green book nonattainment areas for criteria pollutants. United States Environmental Protection Agency.

  • USEPA (2008b) National ambient air quality standard for ozone; final rule. Fed Regist 73:16436–16514

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2009) The green book nonattainment areas for criteria pollutants. United States Environmental Protection Agency.

  • West JJ, Osnaya P, Laguna I, Martinez J, Fernandez A (2004) Co-control of urban air pollutants and greenhouse gases in Mexico City. Environ Sci Technol 38(13):3474–3481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West JJ, Fiore AM, Horowitz LW, Mauzerall DL (2006) Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(11):3988–3993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerling A, Bryant B (2006) Climate change and wildfire in and around California: fire modeling and loss modeling. California Climate Change Center, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise EK (2009) Climate-based sensitivity of air quality to climate change scenarios for the southwestern United States. Int J Climatol 29:87–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported with funding from The Nature Conservancy, Next Ten Foundation, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Excellent research assistance was provided by Sarah Swanbeck.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Bedsworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedsworth, L. Air quality planning in California’s changing climate. Climatic Change 111, 101–118 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0244-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0244-0

Keywords

Navigation