Abstract
Unlike many other environmental problems, the terms used to describe the phenomenon of increasing atmospheric concentrations of anthropogenic greenhouse gases are many, with multiple and sometimes conflicting meanings. Whether there are meaningful distinctions in public perceptions of “global warming,” “climate change,” and “global climate change” has been a topic of research over the past decade. This study examines public preferences for these terms based on respondent characteristics, including climate change beliefs, political affiliation, and audience segment status derived from the “Global Warming’s Six Americas” classification. Certainty of belief in global warming, political affiliation and audience segment status were found to be the strongest predictors of preference, although “I have no preference” was the modal response. Global warming appears to be a more polarizing term than climate change, preferred most by people already concerned about the issue, and least by people who don’t believe climate change is occurring. Further research is needed to identify which of these two names promotes the engagement of people across the spectrum of climate change beliefs in constructive dialogue about the issue.
References
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Change 14:125–136
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38(6):1190–1204
Broder JM (2009). Seeking to save the planet, with a thesaurus. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/02/us/politics/02enviro.html?_r=2. Accessed 3 January 2011
Cohen P, Cohen J, West SG, Aiken LS (2002) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed). Erlbaum, Mahwah
Conway E (2008) What’s in a name? Global warming vs climate change. NASA. http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/climate_by_any_other_name.html. Accessed 3 January 2011
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment 50:26–35
EcoAmerica (2009) Climate and energy truths: our common future. http://ecoamerica.net/sites/default/files/press/ecoAm_Climate_Energy_Truths.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2011
Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd ed. Sage, Los Angeles
Gore A (2007) An inconvenient truth [Documentary transcript]. http://www.admc.hct.ac.ae/hd1/blog/gw/An%20Inconvient%20Truth%20Transcript.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2011
Holdren JP (2007) Global climate disruption: what do we know? What should we do? John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/17661/global_climate_disruption.html. Accessed 3 January 2011
Holdren JP (2010) Climate-change science and policy: what do we know? What should we do. In: Kavli Prize Symposium, International Cooperation in Science, Oslo, Norway. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/jph-kavli-9–2010.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2011
Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York
IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jones JM (2010) Conservatives’ doubts about global warming grow. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/126563/Conservatives-Doubts-Global-Warming-Grow.aspx. Accessed 3 January 2011
Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14(2):147–174
Lee J (2003, March 2) A call for softer, greener language. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/us/a-call-for-softer-greener-language.html. Accessed 3 January 2011
Leiserowitz A (2003) Global warming in the American mind: the roles of affect, imagery and worldviews in risk perception, policy preferences and behavior. Dissertation, University of Oregon
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1–2):45–72
Leiserowitz A, Smith N (2010) Knowledge of climate change across Global Warming’s Six Americas. Yale University, New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010a) Climate change in the American Mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in June 2010. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010b) Global Warming’s Six Americas, June 2010. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change
Luntz F (2002) The environment: a cleaner, safer, healthier America. Luntz Research, Alexandria
Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK (2011) Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: an audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE 6(3):e17571
Nisbet MC, Myers T (2007) Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Pub Opin Q 71(3):444–470
Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N (2011) “Global warming” or “climate change”? Public Opin Q 75(1):115–124
Villar A, Krosnick JA (2010) Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs prices: does word choice matter? Clim Change 105:1–12
Whitmarsh L (2009) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming.” Public Underst Sci 18:401–420
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akerlof, K., Maibach, E.W. A rose by any other name ...?: What members of the general public prefer to call “climate change”. Climatic Change 106, 699–710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0070-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0070-4