Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A rose by any other name ...?: What members of the general public prefer to call “climate change”

A letter

  • Letter
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike many other environmental problems, the terms used to describe the phenomenon of increasing atmospheric concentrations of anthropogenic greenhouse gases are many, with multiple and sometimes conflicting meanings. Whether there are meaningful distinctions in public perceptions of “global warming,” “climate change,” and “global climate change” has been a topic of research over the past decade. This study examines public preferences for these terms based on respondent characteristics, including climate change beliefs, political affiliation, and audience segment status derived from the “Global Warming’s Six Americas” classification. Certainty of belief in global warming, political affiliation and audience segment status were found to be the strongest predictors of preference, although “I have no preference” was the modal response. Global warming appears to be a more polarizing term than climate change, preferred most by people already concerned about the issue, and least by people who don’t believe climate change is occurring. Further research is needed to identify which of these two names promotes the engagement of people across the spectrum of climate change beliefs in constructive dialogue about the issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Change 14:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38(6):1190–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broder JM (2009). Seeking to save the planet, with a thesaurus. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/02/us/politics/02enviro.html?_r=2. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Cohen P, Cohen J, West SG, Aiken LS (2002) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed). Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway E (2008) What’s in a name? Global warming vs climate change. NASA. http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/climate_by_any_other_name.html. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment 50:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • EcoAmerica (2009) Climate and energy truths: our common future. http://ecoamerica.net/sites/default/files/press/ecoAm_Climate_Energy_Truths.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd ed. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore A (2007) An inconvenient truth [Documentary transcript]. http://www.admc.hct.ac.ae/hd1/blog/gw/An%20Inconvient%20Truth%20Transcript.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Holdren JP (2007) Global climate disruption: what do we know? What should we do? John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/17661/global_climate_disruption.html. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Holdren JP (2010) Climate-change science and policy: what do we know? What should we do. In: Kavli Prize Symposium, International Cooperation in Science, Oslo, Norway. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/jph-kavli-9–2010.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JM (2010) Conservatives’ doubts about global warming grow. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/126563/Conservatives-Doubts-Global-Warming-Grow.aspx. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14(2):147–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2003, March 2) A call for softer, greener language. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/us/a-call-for-softer-greener-language.html. Accessed 3 January 2011

  • Leiserowitz A (2003) Global warming in the American mind: the roles of affect, imagery and worldviews in risk perception, policy preferences and behavior. Dissertation, University of Oregon

  • Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1–2):45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Smith N (2010) Knowledge of climate change across Global Warming’s Six Americas. Yale University, New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010a) Climate change in the American Mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in June 2010. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010b) Global Warming’s Six Americas, June 2010. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change

  • Luntz F (2002) The environment: a cleaner, safer, healthier America. Luntz Research, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK (2011) Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: an audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE 6(3):e17571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet MC, Myers T (2007) Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Pub Opin Q 71(3):444–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N (2011) “Global warming” or “climate change”? Public Opin Q 75(1):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar A, Krosnick JA (2010) Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs prices: does word choice matter? Clim Change 105:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L (2009) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming.” Public Underst Sci 18:401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Akerlof.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 145 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akerlof, K., Maibach, E.W. A rose by any other name ...?: What members of the general public prefer to call “climate change”. Climatic Change 106, 699–710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0070-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0070-4

Keywords

Navigation