Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climate change, theory of planned behavior and values: a structural equation model with mediation analysis

A letter

  • Letter
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An online survey about climate change was conducted 2008/2009 among all university members (N = 3541). Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Cultural Theory within a structural equation modeling approach, one main goal was to explain climate-friendly behavioral intentions and the underlying psychological processes comprehensively and to show the interdependencies between both approaches. The model explained 72% of the variance in Intentions to use public transport. Attitude towards public transport (beta = 0.67, p < .001) most strongly influenced Intentions followed by Subjective Norms (beta = 0.23, p < .001). In turn, Attitudes and Norm were explained by the value types Egalitarian, Individualist and Fatalist (24% and 14% respectively). These value types are mediated through Attitudes and Subjective Norms. Recommendations regarding the support of climate friendly behavior are formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen I (1985) Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Open University, Milton Keynes (reprinted)

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (2005) The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP (eds) Handbook of attitudes and attitude change: basic principles. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 173–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Anable J, Lane B, Kelay T (2006) Review of public attitudes to climate change and transport: summary report. The Department for Transport, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle JL (2006) Amos™ 7.0 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40:471–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2003) Multivariate analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 10. Auflage. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S (1996) Habitualisierte pkw-nutzung: integration des konstrukts habit in die theorie des geplanten verhaltens. Z Sozpsychol 27(4):295–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S, Lüdemann C (1996) Eine Überprüfung der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens in zwei Wahlsituationen mit dichotomen Handlungsalternativen: Rad vs. PKW und Container vs. Hausmüll. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, Band 27, Heft 1, pp 32–46

  • Bamberg S, Schmidt P (1997) Theoriegeleitete Evaluation einer umweltpolitischen Maßnahme: Längsschnittliche Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit des Giessener Semestertickets mit Hilfe der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, Band 28, Heft 4, pp 280–297

  • Bamberg S, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2003) Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 25(3):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K (1989) Structural equation models with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne B (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepst, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dake K (1991) Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk. An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. J Cross-Cult Psychol 22(1):61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot J, Steg L (2007) General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: the role of environmental concerns in the TPB. J Appl Soc Psychol 37(8):1817–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland P, Staats H, Wilke HAM (2007) Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 29(4):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath Y, Gifford R (2002) Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:2154–2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmbeck GN (1997) Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Appl Soc Psychol 65:599–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq S, Toulmin C (2006) Three eras of climate change. Sustainable development opinion. International Institute for Environment and Deveplopment (IIED), London

  • Jonas K, Doll J (1996) Eine kritische Bewertung der theorie des überlegten handelns und der theorie des geplanten verhaltens. In: Zeitschrift für sozialpsychologie, Band 27, Heft 1, pp 18–31

  • Kaiser FG, Hübner G, Bogner FX (2005) Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 35(10):2150–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery and values. Clim Change 77:45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A (2007) International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change. Human Development Report Office, Occasional Paper, 2007:31

  • Liverani A (2009) Climate change and individual behavior. Considerations for policy. Policy Research Working Paper 5058, Background Paper to the 2010 World Development Report

  • Loehlin J (2004) Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation models, 4th edn. Hillsdal: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  • O’Brien KL, Wolf J (2010) A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. WIREs Clim Change 1:232–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltedal S, Moen B-E, Klempe H, Rundmo T (2004) Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of cultural theory. Rotunde. 2004: 85. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Psychology, Trondheim, Norway

  • Peters E, Slovic P (1996) The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. J Appl Soc Psychol 26:1427–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root A (1996) Cultural and environmental aspects of transport regulation. Endeavour 20(3):126–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 221–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Peters E (1998) The importance of worldviews in risk perception. Risk, Decision and Policy 3(2):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Sievers I (2000) Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environ Behav 32(2):250–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (1993) A second environmental science: human–environment interactions. Science 260(5116):1897–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L (1993) Value orientations, gender, and environmental concerns. Environ Behav 25:322–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West J, Bailey I, Winter M (2010) Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach. Energy Policy 38(10):5739–5748. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildawsky A (1987) Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation. Am Polit Sci Rev 81(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsch L, Lorenzoni I (2010) Perceptions, behavior and communication of climate change. Editorial commentary. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Clim Change 1(2). doi:10.1002/wcc.7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysel Tikir.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 53.5 kb)

(PDF 199 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tikir, A., Lehmann, B. Climate change, theory of planned behavior and values: a structural equation model with mediation analysis. Climatic Change 104, 389–402 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9937-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9937-z

Keywords

Navigation